Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP12-0088
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/01/2012 | GBONILL1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/02/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/03/2012 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP12-0088 Salpointe High School - Softball Field and Sidewalk improvements Development Package TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 3, 2012 DUE DATE: July 6, 2012 COMMENTS: Zoning has denied the plan on this review because it is clear that the sidewalk issue has not been completely resolved and may require additional dialogue between the consultant and John Beall and other PDSD staff. See comments below, address and revise the plans as requested. Zoning will review the changes when resubmitted for stamps to assure that the changes requested have been made. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is June 6, 2013. 2. The material listed for the pedestrian path on sheet 6 of the DP is not an approved material for accessible routes. Per discussion with John Beall and as indicated to the consultant DG is not an approved material for accessible routes. The pedestrian path must be constructed of concrete cement or similar material with smoothness, hardness and durability. Several emails between PDSD staff and the consultant have been exchanged with regards to what would be acceptable for an accessible route. It is acknowledged that a concrete sidewalk was added to the plan but only to the new facilities of the softball field. The new DG path to the baseball field is still proposed and is indicated as a pedestrian path. A 4' wide concrete sidewalk adjacent to the path that leads to the baseball field facilities must be added. Previous Comment no. 4: DS 2-01.3.8.R - DG is not an approved material for pedestrian sidewalks. Per the PAD, page 65 pedestrian facilities are to be accessible. DG is not approved as a material that provides for accessible routes. The PAD is silent on material to be used for pedestrian facilities and therefore defaults back to the Land Use code or Development Standards. DS 2-08 requires that all sidewalks must be constructed of concrete or similar materials in hardness and durability. Revise the type of material to be used for the new pedestrian facilities proposed on this plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\DP12-088dp3.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan |
| 08/08/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 08/09/2012 | MPADILL1 | URBAN PLANNING | REVIEW | Approved | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP12-0088 Salpointe Catholic High School (Softball Field) () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: Salpointe Catholic High School PAD -17 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Salpointe Catholic High School PAD -17 GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: August 29, 2012 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies () See Additional Comments Attached (X) No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: 07/09/12 () Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat () Development Plan () Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER:msp 791-5505 DATE: 08/09/12 |
| 08/09/2012 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | Review has been completed. Resubmitted required documents when changes have been made to plans. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/09/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |