Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP12-0087
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/07/2012 | CAGUILA1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/08/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/08/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/11/2012 | JWILLIA4 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Review denied. Minimum clearance for double waste enclosure is 24'8''. Current drawings (6 of 12) show 23' 3". Access to enclosure is good. Jeff Drumm, P.E. Environmental Manager City of Tucson Environmental Services 520-837-3713 |
| 06/13/2012 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | The Arizona Department of Transportation (ADOT) has no comments regarding the proposed Development Plan for a parcel of land located west of the northwest corner of Glenn Street and Fairview Avenue (Herman Ventures Development Plan DP12-0087). We appreciate the opportunity to review the Development Plan. Maria Deal Southern Regional Traffic Engineering ADOT 1221 S. 2nd Ave. Tucson, AZ 85713 Phone No.: 520-388-4235 office ________________________________ Confidentiality and Nondisclosure Notice: This email transmission and any attachments are intended for use by the person(s)/entity(ies) named above and may contain confidential/privileged information. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by email, and delete or destroy all copies plus attachments. . |
| 06/19/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 9, 2012 Erin Harris Star Consulting 5405 E. Placita Hayuco Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: DP12-0087 Development Package Dear Erin: Your submittal of the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 3 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE ROLLED 3 Rolled Copies of Revised Development Package (PDSD2, Wastewater) 1 CD of all plans and documents (PDSD) 1 Check made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $50.00 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via email: erin@starconsultingaz.com |
| 06/19/2012 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/20/2012 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP12-0087 HERMAN VENTURES/ DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE DATE: June 20, 2012 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1. Include "A portion of" with all the tax codes that are a part of this project in the notes. 2. Will these parcels be combined and split by the Assessor? If so, please include the Lot Combo Form and the recorded deed(s) that will split the property on the next submittal. 3. Change Glenn Road to Street on the Location Map. 4. Fill in the Book and Page or Sequence number for the Record of Survey on sheet 2. |
| 06/20/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Herman Ventures @ 2803 N. Fairview Avenue Development Package/Rezoning (1st Review) DP12-0087 & C9-12-08 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 20, 20012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This development package was reviewed for full code compliance with the City of Tucson Development Standards (D.S.) and Land Use Code (LUC) for the entire site. 2. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is June 06, 2013 The following comments are based on the "LAYOUT TO BE USED WITH A DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE SUBMITTAL (DS 2-01) dated 12-2009, located at http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/dsd/DevPackageSubmittalLayout.pdf. 3. The sheet order is not correct. The detail sheet should follow the grading plan and the utility plan should follow the site/grading details. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 4. D.S. 2-01.3.2.D Based on the proposed lot splits shown on the plan, see comment 12 below, the address shown on the plan will not work as the proposed development does not have street frontage along Fairview Avenue. Contact Pima County Addressing and provide an administrative address adjacent to the title block. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E Depending on how comment 3 above is addressed the sheet number and page numbers will need to be revised. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the following relevant case numbers on the plan adjacent to the title block on all sheets, DP12-0087 & C9-12-08. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.5 Depending on which set of drawings that I look at the current "SHEET INDEX" shown on sheet 1 does not match the existing order of drawings. This index will need to be revised once comment 3 above is addressed. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.3 Once available list the rezoning conditions on the plan. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Please clarify what "INDUSTRIAL STORAGE" is it is not a use listed within the LUC. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 "ZONING AND LAND USE NOTES" #6 clarify what 1-1 is. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B If applicable all existing easements shall be shown on the plan along with the recordation information. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E It appears that a lot split/combination is proposed. This lot split/combination must be approved prior to approval of the development package. Provide the lot split number adjacent to the title block. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. That said provide the zoning for the parcels located East of Fairview Avenue. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.2 As this project is affected by Major Streets and Routes intersection widening show the future sight visibility triangles based on the future intersection widening. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 The proposed vehicle gates shown at the entrance gate will need to be approved by COT Traffic Engineering prior to approval of the development package. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 As the proposed "STORAGE AREA STABLIZED SURFACE" is proposed for a vehicle use area demonstrate on the plan how the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.6.9 are met. 17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 the proposed "STORAGE AREA STABLIZED SURFACE" is proposed for a vehicle use area demonstrate how a refuse vehicle will gain access across the vertical curbing as shown on the plan. 18. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The Short term bicycle parking shown on the "PARKING SPACE DETAIL" sheet 6 does not meet the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.6 which requires four (4) feet between racks. For your information per LUC Section 3.9.2.B.4 A single rack is designed and located to accommodate two bicycles. 19. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Per LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.4 A single rack is designed and located to accommodate two bicycles. That said based on two racks provided the provided Short-Term should be 4. 20. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Show how the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.4 are met on the plan. 21. D.S. 2-01.3.9.I Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. 22. D.S. 2-01.3.9.J Show the future intersection widening right-of-way lines, curbs and sidewalks on the plan. 23. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Until the future curbs are shown the required building setbacks cannot be verified. It does not appear that the proposed 10' wall and overhang will meet the street setback. 24. D.S. 2-01.3.9.U Once the rezoning conditions are available indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0087 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 06/20/2012 | BECKY NOELL | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no issues with this request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 06/21/2012 | JWILLIA4 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | No objections/ adverse comments. See attached. ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler PAG_logotype 177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 792-1093 x506 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagnet.org <mailto:ekramer@pagnet.org> ekramer@pagnet.org |
| 06/27/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET 3 AND 6 1. Typically, flared sides are used at a curb ramp for pedestrian cross traffic. In this design, a return curb ramp such as is shown at the dumpster is more than adequate. Detectable warnings are not required. SHEET 3 2. The dumpsters are not required to have an accessible route. The ramp and detectable warning strip may be removed and a continous curb be installed in it's place. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/28/2012 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 June 22, 2012 To: ERIN HARRIS STAR CONSULTING Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: HERMAN VENTURES Development Plan - 1st submittal DP12-0087 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD's Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. 2. Sheet 1: Include in the legend a symbol for the proposed private BCS line. 3. Sheet 1: Include the following General Note: THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ______ EXISTING AND______ PROPOSED WASTEWATER FIXTURE UNIT EQUIVALENTS PER TABLE 13.20.045(E)(1) IN PIMA COUNTY CODE 13.20.045(E). And fill in the blanks with the appropriate values. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder Ref. A. Development Plan Checklist Requirements - Chapter 18.71 of the Pima County Code - Section J http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf Ref. C - Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapters 5 & 9 (R18-5-205) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-05.htm and (R-18-9-E301) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-09.htm Ref. D - PCRWRD Procedures, Preliminary Sewer Layout Requirements, 1984 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/procedures.pdf Ref. E - PCRWRD Design Standards for Public Sewerage Facilities, 1983 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/design_standards.pdf Ref. F - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/all_det.pdf Ref. G - Pima County Code of Ordinances, Title 13 - Public Services, Division II - Sewers http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=16119&stateID=3&statename=Arizona Ref. H - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, 2003 Edition http://dot.pima.gov/transeng/stdspecsdet/standardspecs2003.pdf Ref. I - PCRWRD Engineering Directives http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/directives/ |
| 06/29/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | July 3, 2012 DP12-0087 1. The development package cannot be approved until the rezoning is finalized and the appeal periods have expired. List the conditions of rezoning on the DP and provide a letter describing how each has been met. 2. Clarify the treatment of the edge of pavement where the solid waste vehicle maneuvering area crosses. 3. Show extent of intersection widening and taper to show whether it affects the project site. 4. Show details of any fence within the SVT to show that it doesn't interfere with visibility. 5. The water surface elevations for the flow within Glenn Street appear to be higher than the curb. Delineate the area of inundation and address the effects on the project site. Provide curb elevations and proposed driveway elevations. A floodplain use permit will be required for any work within the area of inundation. 6. Detail B on Sheet 6 doesn't seem to match the plan view. Please revise as necessary. 7. Check the title blocks on all sheets to ensure they describe this project. 8. Show the SVTs on the landscape plans to demonstrate the vegetation won't block required visibility. 9. Additional comments may be forthcoming once the rezoning conditions have been adopted. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 07/02/2012 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP12-0087 Herman Ventures _ Glenn Street () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-12-08 Herman Ventures - W. Glenn St. NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: General Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: July 7, 2012 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER:msp 791-5505 DATE: 06/28/12 Planning and Development Services Department Community Planning Section DP12 0087 - Herman Ventures - Glenn Street June 28, 2012 Based on the applicant's request; both Development Plan 12-0087, which is to construct industrial uses and Rezoning Case C9-12-08, which is to change the site's land use zone from MH-1 to I-1 to allow industrial land uses, are under a concurrent review. Prior to the approval of the proposed development plan; rezoning case C9-12-08 must be approved by Mayor and Council. Development plan DP12-0087 shall be required to be in full compliance with all of C9-12-07 rezoning conditions. Staff offers the following comments: 1. Prior to development plan resubmittal, the proposed development plan shall be in full compliance with rezoning case C9-12-07, as approved by Mayor and Council. 2. Prior to development plan approval, add to the general notes all rezoning conditions, verbatim, as approved by Mayor and Council. |
| 07/03/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Include the site water budget with the RWH Plan. DS 10-03 Exhibit 1. 2) Include information for rain shut-off device location/installation on the irrigation plan or details. DS 10-03.5.2.A 3) Revise the plans as necessary to comply with any conditions of rezoning. C9-12-08 4) Section B on sheet 6 does not correspond with the landscape plan or other sheets. The detail appears to indicate a wall in a drainage channel. 5) The landscape plan indicates a stabilized surface for the storage area, while no reference could be verified on the site/grading plans. Clarify the proposed paving. 6) Revise the landscape plan to show any basins or water harvesting areas. DS 2-07.2.2.B: 7) Provide a 6' high screen for any visible outdoor storage areas within 100 feet of Glenn St. LUC Table 3.7.2-I |
| 07/05/2012 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#251042 July 5, 2012 Star Consulting Attn: Erin Harris 5405 E Placita Hayuco Tucson, Arizona 85718 Dear Erin : SUBJECT: Herman Ventures DP12-0087 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted June 8, 2012. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Erik Reed at (520) 917-8706. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) E. Reed, Tucson Electric Power |
| 07/09/2012 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 07/09/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/09/2012 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 07/09/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 07/09/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 07/09/2012 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/16/2013 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |