Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0079
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/30/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/07/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | June 7, 2012 DP12-0079, T12OT00814 Che's Lounge Patio The project cannot be approved as submitted. Identify the floodplain status for the project location. Include water surface elevation contours. (DS 2-01.3.8.I) Since the proposed project is within a FEMA floodplain, additional information is required. Provide existing and proposed spot grades throughout the courtyard area. (DS 2-01.3.8.E, DS 2-01.3.8.N.4) Provide details of the fence and gates as well. Provide sufficient detail to demonstrate that the proposed improvements will not obstruct drainage patterns and will avoid ponding of rainwater. (DS 10.2.12.5) The building on the property south of the proposed project is very close to the property line. Show whether any drainage from that site is directed toward the proposed project. Show how any offsite drainage will be conducted through the project site.(DS 2-01.3.8.H) Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 06/13/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Please verify locations of panic hardware, and indicate on plans. 2) Please provide an exiting plan, with numbers of occupants. 3) There is a rectangle on east side of the lounge which appears to impinge on egress circulation path. Define. |
| 06/14/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Insure all exit gates have panic hardware as required by the 2006 IBC, Section 1008.1.9. 2. Provide an exiting plan showing the number of occupants out of each exit. 3. Provide a total occupant count for each business: a. Provide a new toilet fixture tabulation as per Table 2902.1. b. Show the existing toilet room layouts and existing toilet fixtures. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/15/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Che's Lounge Patio Expansion Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0079 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 18, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Based on the last approved plan it appears that the cumulative expansion equals 18.7% therefore the following comments are based on full code compliance for the area of expansion only. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: D.S. 2-01.2.2 All mapped data shall be drawn at an engineering scale having no more than fifty (50) feet to the inch. That said the site plan should be drawn at an engineering scale not an architectural scale. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.2.D Zoning acknowledges that D.S. 2-01.3.2.D states that an administrative street address is to be provided in the title block. After discussion with Pima County Addressing the administrative street address is to be provided adjacent to the title block. That said remove the administrative address from the title block and provide it adjacent to the title block. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development package number, DP12-0079 adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.4.C Label the section corners on the location map. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.2 Add the acreage to the "LOT AREA" shown under "GENERAL INFORMATION". 6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Clarify what LUC use the "CAFÉ MARCEL" is, Food Service or Alcoholic Beverage Service. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. That said the existing and proposed uses should be listed as "Alcoholic Beverage Service "33", subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.19.C", "General Merchandise Sales "34", subject to: Sec. 3.5.9.2.A", "Administrative and Professional Office "34" and Food Service "33", subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.6.C". 8. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c The expansion calculation does not appear to be correct. It appears that the total existing square footage should be 8,161 square feet. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Per COT Memo dated June 3, 2009 from Craig Gross "Any new buildings or additions to the existing buildings, such as a patio for serving food or beverages, or uses that require more intensive parking that provided above will require a new Board of Adjustment variance before a permit can be approved. That said a Board of Adjustment variance is required prior to approval of this plan. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a As the proposed expansion requires a new Board of Adjustment variance provide a vehicle parking space calculation for the entire site that includes the total number required and the total number provided. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide a bicycle parking calculation on the plan. 12. Provide the new "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE" approval stamp on all sheets. This stamp can be found in "jpg, dwg, pdf" format at http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0079 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 06/20/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/20/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/20/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09/20/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |