Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP12-0075
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/22/2012 | CAGUILA1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/22/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/24/2012 | JWILLIA4 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Based on the overall site plan I cant determine how solid waste and recycle service will be performed. Drawing 1 of 14, Item 22 lists: Two 3 yard containers inside of the building for solid waste and recycle. Containers located inside building. Access at this point. 1) Is this drive in service, roll out service, roll out by onsite maint, roll out by driver? I need more detail to approve. I am available by phone if Willam wants to call . 837-3713. Jeff |
| 05/29/2012 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/01/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 4, 2012 SUBJECT: 1 E Broadway Development Plan Package- Engineering Review TO: Caylor Construction Company; Attn: Rob Caylor LOCATION: 1 E Broadway Blvd, T14S R13E 12/13 Ward 6 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP12-0075 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Statement (Cypress Civil Development, 18MAY12) and Traffic Impact Statement (Cypress Civil Development, 07MAY12). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Site Plan and Grading Plan. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The relevant Development Plan Package number (DP12-0075) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets where referenced by "DP12-XXXX." 2) DS Sec.2-01.3.4: Revise the development plan document and the project-location map to label the Section, Township, and Range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. Per DS Sec.2-01.2.6 the location map must be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet, revise. 3) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: It is acknowledged that a discussion over the proposed SVT's has been provided with the applicant and Laith Alshami, PE PDSD, however in order to modify a development standard a Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR) is required to use the smaller dimensions for the proposed SVT's as shown on the development plan document. Provide a DSMR application for review and approval through PDSD. The development plan document must include a note listing the DSMR Case #, date of approval and any associated conditions if applicable. 4) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 06/01/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 06/05/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: DP12-0075 1 E. Broadway Blvd. Development Package TRANSMITTAL: 06/05/2012 DUE DATE: 06/06/2012 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development package is 05/21/2013. 2. DS 2-01.2.5 A three (3) inch by five (5) inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for a county approval stamp. 3. DS 2-01.2.6 A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. 4. DS 2-01.2.7 The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 5. DS 2-01.3.3 This project has been assigned case number DP12-0075. Place this number near the lower right corner of all sheets. This project will require a RND review or a DRB review. Place the case number near the lower right corner of all sheets. As a general note provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved and any conditions of approval on the plan. Contact Russlyn Wells with PDSD. This project will require a special application submittal and approval for the Infill Incentive District - Core. As a general note provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved and any conditions of approval on the plan. Contact Adam Smith with PDSD. This project will require a submittal and approval for a temporary revocable easement (TRE) for the sunshade (keynote #7) and the canopy (keynote #8) which are encroaching into the right of way. Provide documentation of approval. Contact Jim Rossi with City of Tucson Real Estate Division. 6. DS 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List the development designator and all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. Administrative and Professional Office "36" Parking "36" General Merchandise Sales "36", subject to: Sec. 3.5.9.2.A Family Dwelling "X" 7. DS 2-01.3.7.A.6.b List as a general note: This project meets the overlay zone criteria for: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone; Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone; 8. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.b The Family Dwelling Use with a "X" development designator requires a maximum lot coverage of 80%. Provide allowed and proposed lot coverage calculations. 9. DS 2-01.3.8 If applicable, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. 10. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a There appears to be 39 vehicle parking spaces being removed from this parcel. These parking spaces appear to be related to the property to the north and east. Clearly indicate how these parking spaces are going to be provided. Provide a copy of the cross access and cross parking agreement with the northern property. Clearly indicate in the parking calculations the number of parking spaces allotted for this use. In the parking calculations provide the GFA of the Office use. Provide in the parking calculations the total number of provided vehicle parking spaces including those for the adjacent property. 11. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide in the bicycle parking calculations the number of provided long term and short term bicycle parking spaces. Provide a layout detail of the both types of bicycle parking spaces clearly indicating access aisle, spacing between racks, etc. Provide a detail of the types of rack used for the short term and long term bicycle parking. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentpackage\DP12-0075dp.doc |
| 06/06/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/07/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Address the requirements of LUC 2.8.1.2.6.A.2 "Shade. Except as provided herein, shade shall be provided for at least fifty (50%) percent of all sidewalks and pedestrian access paths as measured at 2:00 p.m. on June 21 when the sun is eighty-two degrees (82°) above the horizon. Shade may be provided by trees, arcades, canopies, or shade structures. The use of plantings and shade structures in the City right-of-way is permitted to meet this standard. The shade provided by a building may serve to meet this guideline. Exception. The Director may approve an IID Plan providing less than fifty (50) percent shade where compliance is not feasible due to a project site's location and/or building orientation and the applicant has made a reasonable attempt to comply with this criterion." 2) Landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements. 3) Revise the landscape plans to include the following standard notes for landscaping in the public right-of-way: All planting and irrigation that is proposed within the ROW must receive a permit prior to construction. Plans should be submitted to the City of Tucson Permits and Code section at 201 N. Stone, 4th floor. Once the permit has been approved, the applicant must call for a "Blue Stake " prior to the required pre-construction meeting with the City Landscape Architect, and prior to starting any work. It is the property owner's responsibility to keep the Sight Visibility Triangles (SVT), and the pedestrian access area clear of vegetation at all times, per Land Use Code (LUC) section 3.7.2.9. Final plant locations must be in compliance with all utility setback requirements. The owner understands that if the City of Tucson Transportation Department or any utility company needs to work within the ROW in the landscaped area, plants and irrigation may be destroyed without replacement or repair. The property owner assumes full liability for this landscape and irrigation, and any damage to roadway, sidewalk and utilities within the public right-of-way. The only private irrigation equipment that is allowed within the ROW is polyethylene type tubing and emitters that are not under constant pressure. All other equipment except for the water meter must be on site. |
| 06/07/2012 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approv-Cond | THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION FOR THIS BUILDING SHALL BE LOCATED SO THE NEAREST FIRE HYDRANT IS WITHIN 100 FEET OR AS CLOSE TO 100 FEET AS POSSIBLE. |
| 06/11/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Denied | Landscape Review 1. Please be aware that if the travel lane is next to the curb then the tree canopy will be growing into that lane. The height requirement for a clearance is 15'. I suggest that you call out standard trees (I hate that for naturally multi-growing plants) but may save both damage to the tree and to someone's truck. 2. I suggest that you us Sch 40 pipe in the ROW. There is a lot of traffic and utility work that can cause damage. Nice job. Love the scupper idea. We all need to do what we can to harvest water. Gary Wittwer |
| 06/11/2012 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES *** CORRECTED *** June 11, 2012 Rob Caylor Caylor Construction Company 6422 E. Speedway Blvd. # 130 Tucson, Arizona 85710 Subject: DP12-0075 1 E BROADWAY Development Package Dear Rob: Your submittal of the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 3 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE ROLLED 3 Rolled Copies Revised Development Package (PDSD) 1 CD of Development Package and other documents (PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via Email: ROB@CAYLOR.NET |