Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0070
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/17/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/04/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 11, 2012 SUBJECT: Plaza Palomino Development Plan Package- Engineering Review TO: Metro Tucson Expediting & Development Attn: Lisa Bowers LOCATION: 2900 N Swan Rd; T13S R14E 35; Ward 2 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP12-0070 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement (Cypress Civil Development, 11MAY12). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Site Plan and Grading Plan. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) It is acknowledged that the overall offsite flow has been reduced from the existing conditions however TDOT does not accept designs that concentrate excess flows into the public right-of-way. The proposed driveway location along the far East side of Fort Lowell has an increase in flow into the right-of-way from existing conditions, revise to help alleviate this flow prior to it entering the right-of-way. Also revise the concentration of flow in the public right-of-way at the proposed storm drain pipe locations. All pipe outlets should drain into a 6-inch deep water harvesting area to alleviate all offsite flows into the right-of-way to match as close to existing conditions as possible. SITE PLAN: 2) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The relevant Development Plan Package number (DP12-0070) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets where referenced by "DP12-XXXX." 3) DS Sec.2-01.3.7: Provide the following note on the development plan document; "Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a PDSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Planning Development Services Department, or contact PDSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html" 4) DS Sec.2-01.3.7: Provide the following note on the development plan document to including a grading/drainage note specifying "conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements)." 5) DS Sec.2-01.3.7: Provide the following note on the development plan document stating; "All retaining walls, proposed fencing and other walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Planning Development Services Departments." 6) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Revise the development plan document to label Swan Road as a "Public and Arterial MS&R." 7) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.G: Revise the development plan documents to label the existing carport structures located onsite over the existing vehicular parking areas. Verify that all carports have been permitted through Planning & Development Services Department. 8) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: Revise the development plan documents to verify curb return termination and/or connectivity to existing roadway curbing. New curb to existing curb within the right-of-way needs to provide a transition detail and new curb ending must provide a 1:1 end transition. 9) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: Revise the development plan documents to label the required 25-foot radii for the concrete curb returns for the proposed driveway location at Swan Rd per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards. 10) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.J: Revise the development plan document to label all dimensions for the MS&R Route, Swan Road. Since the project site is adjacent to a Major Street & Route clearly label and dimension the MS&R right-of-way, future sidewalk, curb, and sight visibility triangles. 11) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.2: Revise the development plan document to label and dimension (provide a detail if necessary) the proposed (2) 4-foot curb openings per the proposed Drainage Statement. Label the location in plan view and provide a Keynote with detail for construction purposes. 12) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.2: Revise the development plan document to containing all outlet flows from the proposed storm drains into a 6-inch deep water harvesting area. Per TDOT the proposed concentration of flow into the public right-of-way is not acceptable unless it drains into a landscape area to help alleviate the increase flow rates into the public right-of-way. 13) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.2: Revise the development plan document to verify if the area under the proposed "existing Wood Deck to be Removed" is proposed to be a 6-inch deep water harvesting area to help contain the out flow discharge of the proposed storm drain. 14) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise the development plan document to verify minimum 4-foot width for all pedestrian access points adjacent to the proposed handicap sign locations. 15) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 16) Prior approval from TDOT Permits and Codes will be required for all improvements within the public right-of-way. A right-of-way use permit application will be required prior to construction. Contact TDOT Permits and Codes for all right-of-way requirements and permit applications. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 06/11/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/11/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | An unpaved planting area, which is a minimum of thirty-four (34) square feet in area and four (4) feet in width, must be provided for each canopy tree planter. This applies to new planters only. LUC 3.7.2.3 Show and identify, by species, existing (protected native) plants to remain in place on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e |
| 06/11/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | PAGE 2 OF 6 1. Transition curbs as referenced to on page 6 are not compliant for accessibility. At all marked crossings, please provide a curb ramp as per ICC A117.1, Serction 406. 2. Insure that all accessible route slopes comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% man running slope and 2% max cross slopes. SHEET 6 OF 6 3. For all details showing a handrail, please provide a large scale detail elevation of all the different types of handrails showing all accessiblity requirements. 4. At detail 4, what are the two cross lines from the curb to the dashed line fence? 5. Provide a large scale details of all the different types of accessible parking layouts showing all accerssible requirements; i.e. dimensions, slopes, signage and aisles. 6. Please identify the "Van Accessible" spaces required by Sections 1106.5 (IBC) and ICC A117.1, Section 502. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/14/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | Circular entrance to site does not appear to meet requirements for fire department access. Fire Department needs 53'-6" outside radius and a 36' inside radius for ladder trucks. |
| 06/14/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Revise the landscape plan to locate and identify preserved protected native plants. |
| 06/14/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: DP12-0070 2900 N. Swan Rd. Development Package TRANSMITTAL DATE: 06/14/12 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-01.3.2.E The title block shall include the following: E. The page number and number of sheets shall include all sheets of the development package including the landscape plans. 2. Ds 2-01.3.3 This project has been assigned case number DP12-0070. Place this number near the lower right corner of all sheets. 3. DS 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing uses of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. 4. DS 2-01.3.7.A.6.b List the overlay zones that are applicable to this project such as: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R). 5. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5 Clearly indicate the width of all PAALs. Missing east of the circular drive. 6. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Remove the underlying lines indicating existing parking spaces and curbing to be removed for clarity purposes. Provide vehicle parking calculations clearly indicating how this site meets the requirements of a shopping center. See LUC Sec. 6.2.19 Shopping Center. A multiple use development composed of an integrated group of establishments (stores), planned, constructed, and managed as a unit, utilizing common or shared facilities, such as buildings, parking, and vehicular and pedestrian access, where no more than (50) percent of the floor area is dedicated to uses with a parking formula of one (1) space per one hundred (100) square feet of gross floor area or a more intense formula. The individual establishments may be owned by a single entity or by separate entities. Remember to include any outdoor eating areas in the parking calculations. There is a note #6 near the northeast corner of building #2910 indicating a light to remain in the middle of a parking space. Clarify. 7. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.c The indicated 12 x 35 loading zone appears to reduce the required 24' width of the PAAL. Clarify. Remove note near the southern most property line indicating 2 - 12 x 35 loading zones. 8. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The calculations for the long term and short term bicycle parking are not correct. See LUC Sec. 3.3.8 and comply. The locations of the short term bicycle parking does not meet LUC Sec. 3.3.9.3. Review and comply. Provide the location of the required long term bicycle parking spaces per LUC Sec. 3.3.9.4. Provide a detail of the short term and long term bicycle parking spaces indicating spacing. dimensions, access aisle. etc. Review LUC Sec. 3.3.9.3, 3.3.9.4, & 3.3.9.5 for required criteria. 9. DS 2-01.3.9.J Clearly indicate the location of the future right of way, future curb locations, sidewalks etc. along all streets. 10. DS 2-01.3.9.R Clearly indicate the minimum width (4') of all pedestrian circulation paths. At the head of all handicap ramps, any areas that vehicles may overhang, etc. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\DP12-0070.doc 06/14/2012 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved site plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped site, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved and stamped site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/22/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |