Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP12-0064
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/02/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/03/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/03/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I have no objections to this proposal/request. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 05/09/2012 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Passed | |
| 05/23/2012 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 05/29/2012, SUBJECT: Rillito Crossing Market Place - LA Fitness Expansion DP12-0064, T13S, R14E, SECTION 19 RECEIVED: Development Package on May 02, 2012 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the Development Package where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: The full site drainage was addressed in the "Rillito Crossing Market Place" Drainage Report, which was prepared by Arroyo Engineering and approved by the City in the year 2005. Therefore, the submitted drainage statement, which is in compliance with the previously approved report, is acceptable and hereby approved. Cover Sheet: 1. Provide the drawings legend as required by D.S. 2-01.2.9. 2. Verify compliance with Rezoning Conditions #2 through 10 for Case Number C9-04-11 and Rezoning Conditions #2, #3, #4 and #7 for Case Number C9-05-26. Demonstrate compliance on the plan when applicable. EVERY SHEET OF PACKAGE: 1. Since the submittal is a development package, replace the words "Tentative Plat/Development Plan" with the words "Development Package". 2. Remove the "Preliminary Not For Construction" Block. 3. Provide a standard title block in accordance with the requirements of D.S. 2-01.2.4. and D.S. 2-01.3.2. 4. Provide the DP12-0004 case number as required by D.S. 2-01.3.3. BASE LAYER SHEET COMMENTS: 1. Provide the tie between the basis of bearing and one of the corners of the parcel (D.S. 2-01.3.8.A). 2. All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided (D.S. 2-01.3.8.B) and (D.S. 2-01.3.9.L). 3. Clarify if the easements described in Keynotes #2 and #10 have already been removed or released General/Grading Notes: 1. Add the following general grading notes: a. The approved Development Package Plan is the only acceptable construction plan onsite. b. The contractor shall remove the fine materials from the bottom of the drainage related basins and scarify their bottoms once the construction activities are completed, in order to remove any fine material build up caused by construction and to restore soil percolation. BMP's may be installed at the basin inlet(s) to prevent the fines from entering the basin c. Any proposed engineering work to be done below grade (i.e. toe-downs, cutoff walls, drainage pipes/structures, etc.) shall not be back filled until Development Services Inspector inspects the work and approves it. d. The contractor is not permitted to make an autonomous decision to carry out construction field changes without prior written approval from the Engineer of Record and the City of Tucson Development Services Department. e. "CALL FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETINGS. FOR A PDSD ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS, CALL IVR (740-6970), OR SCHEDULE WITH A CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE AT THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, OR CONTACT DSD ENGINEERING AT 791-5550 EXTENSION 2101, OR SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ONLINE AT: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/inspections". f. The project will be in compliance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (Excavation and Grading). g. A copy of the approved Grading Plan, Grading Permit, and any Geotechnical Reports shall be kept at the site at all times, until final grading approval. h. Any revision to the Grading Plan MAY require a re-submittal of a revised grading plan for review. Contact PDSD Engineering at 791-5550 to discuss changes in grading design. i. If grading construction is expected to last longer than the expiration date of the grading permit, contact PDSD to renew/extend the Grading Permit. If Final Grading Inspection has not been completed before the Grading Permit expires, and the permit has not been renewed, additional fees and reviews may be required. j. Contact Permits and Codes at 791-5100 for any questions regarding any right-of-way permit requirements. k. As-builts and letters of completion for basin and overall project are required. l. The Engineer of Record shall submit a statement of conformance to as-built plan and the specifications. m. The permitee shall notify the PDSD when the grading operation is ready for final grading inspection. Final grading approval shall not be given until all work, including installation of all drainage facilities and their permanent protective devices, and all erosion control measures have been completed in accordance with the approved grading plan and grading permit, and any required reports have been submitted. n. Depress all landscaped areas a maximum of 6" for waterharvesting" Site/Grading Plan: 1. Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown (D.S. 2-01.3.8.F). 2. Provide the 100-year flood water surface elevation for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more as required by (D.S. 2-01.3.8.I)and (D.S. 2-01.3.9.N.6). 3. It appears that some of the proposed work will be within the regulatory floodplain. Add a note to the site plan to indicate the floodplain situation and to state the need for a floodplain use permit. Additionally, submit a floodplain use permit application with the next submittal. 4. Clarify the note shown on Sheet 3 of 5 that states "Existing to Remain, Typ.". What is existing? 5. Provide the proposed building roof drainage (D.S. 2-01.3.9.N.2). 6. Verify if sidewalk scuppers are required are the proper locations around the structure for the proposed structure roof drainage (D.S. 2-01.3.9.N.3). 7. All proposed work in the public right of way will require a right of way excavation permit or a Private Improvement Agreement. Contact Richard Leigh of Transportation Department Permit and Codes at 791-5100 for additional information. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/24/2012 | JWILLIA4 | WWM | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 May 16, 2012 To: RYAN J. LANCOUR, P.E. R.A. SMITH NATIONAL BEYOND SURVEYING AND ENGINEERING Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: LA FITNESS EXPANSION Development Plan – 1st submittal DP12-0064 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan. Include the following General Note: THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 05/29/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/29/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/30/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/31/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: DP12-0064 4240 N. 1st Ave. Development Package TRANSMITTAL: 06/01/2012 DUE DATE: 06/1/2012 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development package is 05/01/2013. 2. This plan is required to be reviewed as a Development Package and must meet the requirements of DS 2-01 for layout and content. Please review and comply. This plan is not a tentative / development plan. Remove all references to a t / dp. This plan is a Development Package. Remove all notes regarding "Preliminary not for construction." 3. DS 2-01.2.5 A three (3) inch by five (5) inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for a county approval stamp. 4. DS 2-01.3.2 The title block shall include the following information. B. A brief legal description. D. The administrative street address is to be placed near the title block E. Page number and number of pages. ( 1 of 6, 2 of 6, etc.) 5. DS 2-01.3.3 This project has been assigned case number DP12-0064. Place this number near the lower right corner of all sheets. Place the case number S05-207 near the lower right corner of all sheets. 6. DS 2-01.3.7.A.4 The proposed use for this project listed in general note #4 should read as "Recreation "28" 7. DS 2-01.3.8.A On sheet #3 key note number 2 indicates a property line that has been removed by final plat. If this has been completed then remove from the plans the indicated property line. 8. DS 2-01.3.8.B Provide recording docket and page information for all indicated easements. (By final plat not correct, provide recording information) 9. DS 2-01.3.9.Q The proposed max. height (30') of the addition does not meet the criteria of rezoning condition (C9-04-10) # 22. Maximum allowed height for the building in the southeast corner is twenty six (26) feet. Revise notes. 10. DS 2-01.3.9.R Per the 2010 aerial photos the pedestrian circulation path that is required to connect to the sidewalk located in the right of way for Limberlost Dr. has not been completed. It is required to be completed or provide documentation that this requirement has been waived. Per the 2010 aerial photos the undeveloped area south of the existing building must be physically separated from the vehicle use area and must be provided with some type of dust prevention. It is required to be completed or provide documentation that this requirement has been waived. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\DP12-0064dp.doc Grading notes for permits plus. With DEVELOPMENT PLAN 06/01/2012 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 06/01/2012 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 1, 2012 Lisa Bowers MetroTED 2940 N. Swan Road Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: DP12-0064 LA FITNESS EXPANSION Development Package Dear Lisa: Your submittal of the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 2 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE ROLLED 2 Rolled Copies of Revised Development Package (PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via : Delivered OTC |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |