Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0056
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/29/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 06/07/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Sky Bar Patio Expansion Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0056 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 14, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Based on the last approved plan it appears that the cumulative expansion equals 18.6% therefore the following comments are based on full code compliance for the area of expansion only. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 2. D.S. 2-01.3.2.D Zoning acknowledges that D.S. 2-01.3.2.D states that an administrative street address is to be provided in the title block. After discussion with Pima County Addressing the administrative street address is to be provided adjacent to the title block. That said remove the administrative address from the title block and provide it adjacent to the title block. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E Provide the number of pages with in the title block. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development package number, DP12-0056 adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. That said the existing and proposed use should be listed as "Alcoholic Beverage Service "33", subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.19.C". 6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation on the plan that meets the requirements of LUC Section 3.2.11 on the plan. This calculation should include the allowed Floor Area (FA) and the proposed Floor Area (FA). 7. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c Provide a use area expansion calculation on the plan. This calculation is cumulative and should include the last patio expansion. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.8.A As this site is made up of two (2) parcels, 117-04-3000 & 117-04-301A. Show all property lines along with bearing in degrees, minutes and seconds. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, 10. type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 The proposed parking area access lane shown north of the proposed patio expansion does not meet the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.6.4.A, twenty-four (24) feet, a PARKING DESIGN MODIFICATION REQUEST (PDMR) is required. If a PDMR is approved provide the PDMR number, date of approval, what was modified and any conditions on the plan. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Per LUC Section 3.3.6.6.B.2 Access lanes and PAALs shall be setback at least two (2) feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction. The additional area is necessary to provide clearance for fire, sanitation, and delivery vehicles. That said show the required two (2) foot setback from the proposed fence shown along the north side of the proposed patio expansion to the PAAL. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The "COMPACT DELIVERY VEHICLE ONLY" parking spaces may not be counted as provided vehicle parking spaces as they do not meet the minimum standards. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. Based on comment ?? above the provided number should be 31. A Board of Adjustment for Variance or Modification of Development Regulations (MDR) will need to be approved prior to approval of the development package. If either process is approved provide the following information on the plan; number, date of approval, what was approved, any conditions of approval. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide a bicycle parking calculation on the plan. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Under "SITE PLAN CALCULATIONS 3." there is a "1560 S.F. PROPOSED SALES OFFICE" listed, this building is not shown on the site plan, clarify. 18. Provide the new "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE" approval stamp on all sheets. This stamp can be found in "jpg, dwg, pdf" format at http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0056 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 06/14/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Insure the new gate has a panic bar. 2. Provide a large scale detail of the accessible parking sign shown with a "Van Accessible" sign. END OF REVIEW |
| 06/15/2012 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: June 15, 2012 ENGINEER: Matthew Hamilton, R.A. PROJECT: Sky Bar Patio Expansion Development Package (1st Review) CASE: DP12-0056 ADDRESS: 536 N 4TH AV LOCATION: Ward 6 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, P.E. SUMMARY: Two sets of the As-built grading plans were submitted for review of the proposed expansion for the Skybar. Engineering does not recommend approval until the modification request is approved. See comments below. GRADING PERMIT COMMENTS: 1) LUC Section 3.3.6.4.A: A modification request is needed to for reduced PAAL width less than 24-ft since proposed patio expansion encroaches in the area needed for vehicular maneuvering to back up and enter the proposed compact parking spaces. 2) LUC Section 3.3.6.6.B.2: Address the following comments on planview: A) Show 2-ft dimension from wall to PAAL on planview. B) Provide note that compact stalls will have signs/signage provided indicating that the stalls are for compact vehicles only. C) Provide radii dimensions on planview for the maneuverability of the proposed back-up vehicular movements for the proposed compact parking spaces. 3) Please provide blank approval stamp for the Development Package on all sheets, using the following link: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp Provide resubmittal with revised plans, modification approval documentation, and response letter. If you have questions or would like to set up a meeting, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E. Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 06/19/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/19/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide previous approved site plans for reference. 2. Note: Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B 3. Ensure that all zoning comments and concerns are addressed 4. Additional comments may apply |
| 06/20/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/20/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/30/2012 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |