Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP12-0053
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/20/2012 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 06/22/2012 | JWILLIA4 | WWM | REVIEW | Approved | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 June 21, 2012 To: ERIN HARRIS, PE STAR CONSULTING OF ARIZONA, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: 3rd Street Development - 3830 E. 3rd Street Development Plan - 2nd submittal DP12-0053 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 06/25/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 3rd Street Development - 3830 E. 3rd Street. Development Package (2nd Review) DP12-0053 TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 25, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 As the proposed back-up spur shown at the west end of the southern parking area is adjacent to the west property line a minimum distance of three (3) feet is required to the property line. A PARKING DESIGN MODIFICATION REQUEST (PDMR) is required to reduce the thr33 (3) feet to two (2) feet. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The provided Short-Term Bicycle parking detail provides no detail. Provide a fully dimensioned detail see LUC Sections 3.3.9.2.B.6 & 8. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O The proposed porches shown on the plan do not appear to meet the minimum setback of 10'-0". A Design Development Option (DDO) will need to be approved prior to approval of the Development Package. Until the height of the porch and the proposed setback is provided DDO comments cannot be provided. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R The proposed sidewalk/pedestrian refuge shown running behind the vehicle parking space located at the north end of the project cannot run between the parking space and the PAAL that provides access to it. See D.S. 2-08.4.1.F. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0053 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 06/25/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD Zoning Review Transmittal TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: DP12-0053 3830 E. 3rd Street TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 15, 2012 Proposed project - Multi-Family - 14 units - With Porches COMMENTS: Site Plan OK D.D.O. required for: Perimeter yard setbacks from the proposed porches to the east and west perimeter yard. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.4 development designator "P", perimeter yard indicator "CC" the required perimeter yard is ten (10) feet or three quarters (3/4) the height of the proposed exterior wall (H), whichever is greater: Based on the exterior wall height of 9'-2" the required perimeter yard for all porches is 10'-0". See the following for the proposed perimeter yard setbacks for each proposed porch; 1. Building #1 - Units 1, 2 & 3 - Proposed perimeter yard setback to the east property line = 4'-2" 2. Building #2 - Units 4, 5, 6 & 7 - Proposed perimeter yard setback to the east property line = 4'-2" 3. Building #3 - Units 8, 9 & 10 - Proposed perimeter yard setback to the east property line = 4'-2" 4. Building #4 - Units 11, 12, 13 & 4 - Proposed perimeter yard setback to the east property line = 4'-2" For Building #1 - Units 1, 2 & 3 The three (3) proposed porches are currently located within a 10' Electrical Easement. This easement will need to be abandoned or provide a letter from TEP stating that they have no objection to the proposed structures within the easement prior to approval of the development package. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please contact me at Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.gov or (520) 837-4956 |
| 07/05/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: July 5, 2012 SUBJECT: 3rd Street Development- Development Plan Package- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Star Consulting; Attn: Erin Harris, PE LOCATION: 3830 E 3rd Street, T14S R14E 09 Ward 6 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP12-0053 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement (Star Consulting, 01JUN12). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Site Plan and Grading Plan. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) Completed. 2) Completed. 3) Completed. 4) Completed. 5) Completed. SITE PLAN: It is recommended that Development Standard 2-01 "Development Package" be reviewed prior to resubmittal. DS Sec.2-02 and 2-05 no longer exists and all reviews fall under DS Sec.2-01 for Development Package. The standard has changes that must be incorporated into the plan sheets for review and approval. 6) Completed. 7) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: Prior to approval of the development plan package the existing electrical easement needs to be vacated and the recordation information provided. 8) Completed. 9) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan documents and Detail to provide the minimum dimensions for the proposed back-up spur per LUC 3.3.6.D. A minimum 3 feet shall be provided between the back of spur and obstruction over 6-inchs in heights and the spur shall be minimum 3-feet in depth. 10) Completed. 11) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan, Section B/9, to provide the minimum 24-foot dimension for the proposed PAAL per Table 3.3.6.4.A-III of the LUC. The site sheets dimension the correct 24-foot width, but the Section still only shows 20-feet. The Section must also label the sidewalk location along both sides of the PAAL. 12) Completed. 13) Completed. 14) Completed. 15) Completed. 16) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise Section B/9 to clearly label and dimension the sidewalk along the east side of the PAAL. Per DS Sec.2-08.4.1.F the proposed sidewalk that connects the east side of the development to the right-of-way can not be located between the parking space and the PAAL area that provides access to that space, revise. On Sheet 5 add all Keynotes with descriptions to the Keynote Legend (specifically Keynotes #4 and 5). 17) Acknowledged. 18) Completed. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comment provided above. For expedite purposes the development plan package can be reviewed over the counter (PDSD Engineering Division comment only) for stamp approval once all items have been addressed. Please call to schedule an appointment when ready, 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 07/06/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. |
| 07/18/2012 | RONALD BROWN | HC SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. At sheet 6 of 9, please show identify the ramp and show slope and spot grades. END OF REVIEW |
| 07/18/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 07/19/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | RAPID ENTRY CAPABILITIES WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE GATE. KNOX KEY SWITCH OR EQUIVALENT WILL BE REQUIRED. THE PROPOSED OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION IS R-2. THIS IS THE REASON FOR THE REQUIRED AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. |
| 07/24/2012 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES July 19, 2012 Erin STAR Consulting 5405 E. Placita Hayuco Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: DP12-0053 3rd STREET DEVELOPMENT Plan Dear Erin: Your submittal of the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 2 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 2 Rolled Copies of the Revised Development Plan (PDSD2) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via Email: ERIN@STARCONSULTINGAZ.COM |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/24/2012 | GERARDO BONILLA | REJECT SHELF | Completed |
| 07/24/2012 | GERARDO BONILLA | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 07/19/2012 | JWILLIA4 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |