Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP12-0053
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/19/2012 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/19/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/23/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 3rd Street Development - 3830 E. 3rd Street. Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0053 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 23, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. D.S. 2-01.3.2.D Zoning acknowledges that D.S. 2-01.3.2.D states that an administrative street address is to be provided in the title block. After discussion with Pima County Addressing the administrative street address is to be provided adjacent to the title block. That said remove the administrative address from the title block and provide it adjacent to the title block. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development package number, DP12-0053 adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.a Under "ZONING AND LAND USE NOTES" #9 there are references to "158 SF OVERHANG" clarify what this overhang is as it typically does not count for square footage. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide a lot coverage calculation that meets the requirements of LUC Section 3.2.9. As this is a multi-family project the lot coverage includes building square footage and vehicle use are. Per development designator "P" and LUC Section 3.2.3.1.D the maximum lot coverage is 70%. Based on the provided lot coverage calculation, which does not appear to include vehicle use area, 76% lot coverage is proposed, a Board of Adjustment for Variance is required. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B The "EXISTING 10' ELECTRIC EASEMENT PER DIT 1294 AT PG 68 TO BE VACATED" will need to be vacated prior to approval of this development package. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Provide dimensions for the proposed back-up spur shown at the west end of the southern parking area. See LUC Section 3.3.6.6.D.2 & .3. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 As the proposed 20' PAAL located between the proposed buildings provided direct access to vehicle parking spaces it is required to be 24' wide. See LUC Table 3.3.6.4.A-III and LUC definitions for Access Land and Parking Area Access Lane. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 As the parking area access lane located between the proposed buildings provides access for refuse pick up demonstrate on the plan how either LUC Section 3.3.6.5.B or LUC Sections 3.3.6.6.B.2 is met for the overhangs show on buildings 4, 5, 6 & 7. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. As this is a multi-family project, 14 units on a single parcel, the parking space calculation is based on LUC Section 3.3.4, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Multifamily Dwellings - 0-70 units/acre, and the number of bedrooms per unit. Provide a vehicle parking space calculation that provides the number of bedrooms in each unit and the number of spaces required and provided. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Sheet 6, "PARKING SPACE DETAIL", the dimension for the location of the wheel stop does not meet the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.6.8.C. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The bicycle parking space calculation is not correct. As this is a multi-family project, 14 units on a single parcel, the parking space calculation is based on LUC Section 3.3.8.2.B, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP, Multifamily Dwellings and Group Dwelling, and number of bedrooms proposed. 12. Provide details for the required Long and Short Term bicycle parking. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 a sidewalk must connect all buildings on site. Per D.S. 2-08.4.B a sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located. That said provide a sidewalk that connects all building located on the east side of the proposed PAAL and connects to the buildings located on the west side of the PAAL. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q There are dashed lines on the plan that appear to be porches or slabs. Clarify what the dashed lines are. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R The striped area shown running east from the proposed accessible access aisle to the curb area is required to be a sidewalk. 17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.V If applicable for gang mailboxes indicate location to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements, such as pedestrian accessibility, utilities, and landscaping. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0053 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 04/26/2012 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#248743 April 26, 2012 Star Consulting 5405 E Placita Hayuco Tucson, Arizona 85718 Dear Star Consulting: SUBJECT: 3rd Street Development DP12-0053 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted April 19, 2012. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. If customer wants overhead facilities removed it will be billable. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 04/27/2012 | JWILLIA4 | WWM | REVIEW | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 April 27, 2012 To: ERIN HARRIS, PE STAR CONSULTING OF ARIZONA, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: 3rd Street Development - 3830 E. 3rd Street Development Plan – 1st submittal DP12-0053 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD’s Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Ref. A 2. Sheet 4: Revise plan to replace CO# 8875-09 with a new public manhole. From the new manhole run a private 8” line directly south into the site and then east to the private street to serve the buildings on site. 3. Sheet 1: Replace Wastewater Note # 22 to reflect the changes in proposed sewer: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. 4. Sheet 1: Remove Wastewater Notes 23, 26 and 27. Ref. A This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder Ref. A. Development Plan Checklist Requirements – Chapter 18.71 of the Pima County Code - Section J http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf Ref. C - Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapters 5 & 9 (R18-5-205) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-05.htm and (R-18-9-E301) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-09.htm Ref. D - PCRWRD Procedures, Preliminary Sewer Layout Requirements, 1984 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/procedures.pdf Ref. E - PCRWRD Design Standards for Public Sewerage Facilities, 1983 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/design_standards.pdf Ref. F - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/all_det.pdf Ref. G - Pima County Code of Ordinances, Title 13 - Public Services, Division II - Sewers http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=16119&stateID=3&statename=Arizona Ref. H - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, 2003 Edition http://dot.pima.gov/transeng/stdspecsdet/standardspecs2003.pdf Ref. I - PCRWRD Engineering Directives http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/directives/ |
| 05/02/2012 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 05/08/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2498.94') is higher than the first floor elevations for each of the fourteen buildings. Provide a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson to serve any plumbing fixtures located on the first floor. Fixtures located on floor levels above the first floor elevation of the building shall not drain through the backwater valve. |
| 05/08/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 10, 2012 SUBJECT: 3rd Street Development- Development Plan Package- Engineering Review TO: Starr Consulting; Attn: Erin Harris, PE LOCATION: 3830 E 3rd Street, T14S R14E 09 Ward 6 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP12-0053 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement (APEX DevCon, PC, 09APR12). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Site Plan and Grading Plan. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) Revise the Drainage Statement to provide a discussion with calculations for all proposed drainage infrastructure (curb cuts with rock riprap pad and/or scuppers into the water harvesting areas) to ensure that it contains the 10-year flow event to satisfy Ds Sec.2-08.4.1.E. 2) Provide a discussion within the Drainage Statement to include a description of the soil classification for this project site. 3) Provide a discussion within the Drainage Statement for the existing drainage swale located just offsite along the west property boundary. Clearly demonstrate that the swale will function as designed and that no excess nuisance flow crosses the neighboring property. 4) Revise the Drainage Statement to include both a pre-construction and post-construction exhibit clearly labeling all areas of improvements and drainage areas with post development flow arrows. 5) Revise the Drainage Statement to provide the locations of all proposed drainage infrastructure on the post-developed exhibit, clearly provide all required dimensions and labels to verify on the development plan document. SITE PLAN: It is recommended that Development Standard 2-01 "Development Package" be reviewed prior to resubmittal. DS Sec.2-02 and 2-05 no longer exists and all reviews fall under DS Sec.2-01 for Development Package. The standard has changes that must be incorporated into the plan sheets for review and approval. 6) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The relevant Development Plan Package number (DP12-0053) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 7) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B; Prior to approval of the development plan package the existing electrical easement as noted by "EXISTING 10' ELECTRIC EASEMENT PER DKT 1294 AT PG 68 TO BE VACATED" needs to be vacated and the recordation information provided, remove the easement from the site plan since it will no longer exist. 8) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document and/or associated details to provide the pavement structure design recommendations per the Geotechnical Report. 9) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan documents to provide the minimum dimensions for the proposed back-up spur per LUC 3.3.6.D. 10) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document and the detail on Sheet 6 to accurately label the 2.5 foot overhang for the proposed wheel stops. Refer to DS Sec.3-05.2.3.C.1. 11) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan documents to provide the minimum 24-foot dimension for the proposed PAAL per Table 3.3.6.4.A-III of the LUC. Verify the T-intersection is also 24-feet in width from curb to the proposed parking stalls. 12) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M: Provide a Development Plan Package Note on Sheet 1 to include a reference to the Geotechnical Report. The reference should include the job number, date of report, and any special recommendations/requirements associated with this project. 13) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.1: Revise the development plan document to ensure how the stormwater runoff from the PAAL drains into the proposed water harvesting areas (WHA). Per elevations and flow arrows along with the proposed curb and gutter line along the west side of the PAAL it appears that the WHA on the west side should provide a scupper to allow stormwater to flow into this area to alleviate offsite flows from entering into the public right-of-way. 14) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.1: Revise the development plan document and associated details to provide a reference to the PC/COT Standard Detail for the required sidewalk scupper to ensure all aspects of construct. 15) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.2: Revise the development plan document, Keynote and any associated details to label the required minimum filter fabric specifications or reference to PC/COT Standard Specification 1014. The Development Plan Package is to be used as the construction document for site and grading and must accurately label and detail all improvements in plan view and on all associated details for construction purposes. 16) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 a sidewalk must connect all buildings on site. Per DS Sec.2-08.4.B a sidewalk will be provided adjacent and parallel to any PAAL on the side where buildings are located. Revise to provide a sidewalk that connects all building located on the east side of the proposed PAAL to the buildings located on the west side of the PAAL. 17) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 18) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan documents to correctly label the required handicap access ramps (PC/COT Standard Detail #207) proposed within the public right-of-way, the ANSI ramp as keynoted does not apply to public right-of-way development. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 05/14/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET 1 OF 9 1. At the "Building Plan Notes": a. Note one should read A2 Apartments not M for Merchantile. b. Note 2 should read "VB" maybe? c. Generally residential mail is delivered to a curb mail box, single or grouped. Please clarify. SHEET 3 OF 9 2. Please provide accessible sidewalk route connecting all units. SHEET 6 OF 9 3. At the "Parking Space Detail": a. Passage through pensula is to be concrete, no marking necessary. b. Need a ramp up to accessible route in front of units. c. Indicate slopes in accessible parking and aisle area to be a maximum of 2% in all directions, ANSI Section 502.5. 4. At the "Dupmster Enclosure Detail": A. Connect accessible route to new accessible route (walkway) to be placed in front of all east side units. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/15/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. A 5' continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Screen in not optional for vehicle use area. Identify required screening element on the site and landscape plans. 2. Provide NPPO plan or Application for Exception, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property DS 2-15.2.0.C. 3. Provide the development package number, DP12-0053 adjacent to the title block on all sheets D.S. 2-01.3.3 4. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 5. Additional comments may apply. |
| 05/15/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Denied | R-2 occupancies require the installation of automatic fire sprinklers. Please indicate this on the cover sheet that automatic fire sprinklers will be installed |
| 05/16/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/21/2012 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 21, 2012 Erin STAR Consulting 5405 E. Placita Hayuco Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: DP12-0053 3rd STREET DEVELOPMENT Development Package Dear Erin: Your submittal for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 3 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE ROLLED 3 Copies Revised Development Package 2 Copies Drainage Statement 1 CD Containing All Documents and Plans Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: ERIN@STARCONSULTINGAZ.COM |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/20/2012 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |