Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0046
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/12/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/13/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/16/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/19/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: O'Rielly Chevrolet - Paint Booth Addition Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0046 TRANSMITTAL DATE: April 20, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The development package should be separate from the building plans. Plans can run concurrently but the drawing index for the development package should only include sheets required by D.S. 2-01.0 The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. D.S. 2-01.2.4 A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet 2. D.S. 2-01.2.6 The project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. 3. D.S. 2-01.2.8 The plan drawing shall be oriented with north toward the top of the sheet. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.1 The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s),or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.2. The following information should be provided within the title block; a. D.S. 2-01.3.2.B A brief legal description b. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E Provide the page number and number of pages i.e., x of y. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development package number, DP12-0046 adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.4 It does not appear that the project location map is drawn at 3' = 1 mile scale. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. That said the existing and proposed use should be listed as "VEHICLE RENTAL AND SALES "31", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.9.5.A AND .B". 9. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Per LUC Section 2.5.4.2 Permitted Land Uses within the C-2 zone Trade Service and Repair, Major (Auto Body Repair) is not an allowed use or secondary land use. That said the COT Zoning Administrator is currently looking at this issue. Contact Glenn Moyer @837-4954 or email Glenn.Moyer@tucsonaz.gov for clarification and/or a decision of this issue. Until a decision is given this development package cannot be approved. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Provide a General Notes stating "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLYA ZONE(S) CRITERIA; SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE & SEC. 2.8.4, GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE". 11. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b The provided Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation does not appear to be correct. See Development Package D12-0017 and revise if necessary. 12. Provide the new "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE" approval stamp on all sheets. This stamp can be found in "jpg, dwg, pdf" format @ http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0046 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 05/01/2012 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | The Site Plan, DP12-0046, cannot be approved prior to the approval of the FUP. |
| 05/07/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/07/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | |
| 05/07/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/23/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |