Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0045
Review Name: SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/19/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/04/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 8, 2012 SUBJECT: Chuze Fitness Center Development Plan Package- Engineering Review TO: APEX Development Consultants; Attn: Derek Roberts, PE LOCATION: 4343 N Oracle Rd, T13S R13E 23 Ward 3 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP12-0045 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement (APEX DevCon, PC, 09APR12). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Site Plan and Grading Plan. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) Revise the Drainage Statement Title Block to correctly label the name of the proposed project; "Chuze Fitness Center at Wetmore Plaza" 2) Revise the drainage statement to provide a discussion with calculations for the proposed sidewalk scupper to ensure that it contains the 10-year flow event to satisfy Ds Sec.2-08.4.1.E. 3) Provide a discussion within the Drainage Statement to include conformance with the new Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance (DS Sec.10-03) and the proposed design of the project to meet all requirements within the Ordinance and Detention/Retention Manual. SITE PLAN: It is recommended that Development Standard 2-01 "Development Package" be reviewed prior to resubmittal. DS Sec.2-02 and 2-05 no longer exists and all reviews fall under DS Sec.2-01 for Development Package. The standard has changes that must be incorporated into the plan sheets for review and approval. 4) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The relevant Development Plan Package number (DP12-0045) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets where referenced by "DP11-017." 5) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.1: Revise the development plan document and associated details for the proposed sidewalk scupper to ensure all aspects of construct. Verify that the modified scupper meets the minimum requirements of PC/COT Standard Detail and verify that all dimensions or notes that are referenced in the detail are provided with the detail on Sheet 3. 6) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise the development plan document to include a Keynote labeled in plan view or provide an associated detail for all the proposed handicap access ramps to ensure they meet the minimum ANSI requirements. 7) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise the development plan document to provide minimum widths for all pedestrian access points, to include concrete sidewalks and striped pedestrian routes. 8) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Provide a Keynote or label in plan view to reference the PC/COT Standard Detail #200 for the proposed sidewalk construction at all locations. 9) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 05/08/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter and backflow preventer b. the rim elevation of the upstream manhole Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 05/10/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/11/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: DP12-0045 4343 N. Oracle Rd. Development Package TRANSMITTAL DATE: 5/16/12 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-01.3.3 This project has been assigned case number DP12-0045. Place this case number near the lower right corner of all sheets. 2. DS 2-01.3.7.A.4 In the site information the proposed use "Recreation "34" does not have a subject to section. Remove "subject to: Sec. 6.3.7". 3. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.a Clearly indicate on the site plan the area of building expansion. Provide dimensions, height, and square footage on the foot print of the proposed expansion. Clarify the notes indicating two different heights of builidings. 4. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.c The indicated building expansion calculations area incorrect. Per LUC Sec.3.2.8.4.D.2.c All expansions which occur after the adoption of this ordinance are cumulated in determining the twenty-five (25) percent expansion. Per the last approved site plan DP11-017 the base square footage is 75914. The new square footage is indicated as 83777. Therefore the cumulative expansion is 10.4%. Revise. 5. DS2-01.3.9.H.1 There appears to be additional islands being placed in the vehicle use area. Clearly indicate what is new construction. Provide PAAL widths between the new islands. 6. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide on the details for the handicap and standard parking spaces the dimension for locating the wheel stops. Min. 2'-6" from the front of the parking space. 7. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.c Show all existing and proposed loading zones. Provide calculations clearly indicating the number of required and provided loading zones. 8. DS 2-01.3.9.R The indicated pedestrian circulation path connecting from the southeast corner of the building to near the trash enclosure must meet DS2-08. Striped asphalt is only allowed at crosswalks. The surfacing material for all other pedestrian circulation paths is concrete and must be physically separated from all vehicle use areas. This would also include the striped area adjacent to the vehicle parking space. Clearly indicate the location of all handicap ramps. The crosswalk indicated connecting to the sidewalk near the trash enclosure cannot cross behind a vehicle parking space. Clearly indicate the widths of all new sidewalks. Minimum width is four (4) feet. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\DP12-0045.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 05/14/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET CS2 1. Please provide a large scale detail of the accessible route connection from the 3,000 s,f, retail store to the corner parking pensula just adjacent to the two accessible parking space: a. The only areas that require markings are the marked crossings that cross a PAAL. All other areas of the accessible route should be concrete as required by Zoning with no markings. b. All marked crossing required detectable warning strips at both ends as per ANSI 117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14. c. Provide concrete ramps as need to transition a raised curb as per ANSI 117.1, Section 405 and 406 where appropriate. 2. At the most southerly single accessible parking space, please provide a ramp as per ANSI 117.1, Section 406, this one is non-compliant. 3. Ditto comment 1 for the middle marked crossing 4. Provide a detail reference at the access to Wetmore. 5. Insure all accessible route slopes comply with ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3, 5% max running 2% max cross. SHEET CS3 5. As per ANSI 117.1, Section 502.5, accessible parking and ailse areas shall have a maximum of 2% slope in all directions. a. The new single accessible space slopes more than 2%. It also has a non-compliant ramp as per comment 2. b. The two accessible parking spaces show no slope at all. Please indicate all slopes. 6. At the Wetmore Access detail, please provide handrails on both side of the 1:12 ramp that is 20' feet long, as per ANSI 117.1, Sections 405.8 and 505. SHEET CS1 7. At the accessible parking detail, indicate a maximum of 2% slopes in all accessible parking and aisle areas as per ANSI 117.1, Section 502.5. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/15/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide previously approved site and landscape plans for reference. 2. Identify and/or reference planter locations on the site and landscape plans 3. Provide Development Plan Package number (DP12-0045) to the lower right hand corner of each sheet DS Sec.2-01.3.3 4. Depending on Zoning comments: Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B. 5. All new landscape areas will be depressed to accept water flow from roofs, PAAL, and parking areas. Show by detail or spot elevations how landscape areas will accommodate water harvesting. 6. Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed 7. Additional comments may apply |
| 05/15/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/25/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |