Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP12-0038
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/08/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/09/2012 | JWILLIA4 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Date Case Number Project Address May 9, 2012 DP12-0038&T12SE00062 Little Ranch Preschool Comments: Environmental Services approves the site plan for both solid waste and recycle standards. |
| 05/09/2012 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Passed | |
| 05/09/2012 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | |
| 05/09/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/09/2012 | ROBERT YOUNG | PIMA COUNTY | PIMA CTY - DEV REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/09/2012 | JWILLIA4 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | No adverse comments. ____________________________ Eric W. Kramer, Ph.D., AICP Senior Land-Use Modeler PAG_logotype 177 N. Church Ave, Suite 405 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 792-1093 x506 (tel) (520) 620-6981 (fax) www.pagnet.org <mailto:ekramer@pagnet.org> ekramer@pagnet.org |
| 05/09/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 05/10/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#249929 May 31, 2012 A2 Studio Architecture Attn: Aaron Katz 4009 E Poe Street Tucson, Arizona 85711 Dear Mr. Katz: SUBJECT: Little Ranch Preschool DP12-0038 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted May 9, 2012. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plan the facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans. *Does not appear that OH facilities are proposed building will be, but there are OH facilities on parcels that are not marked on development plan.* Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to City of Tucson for TEP’s review. You may contact the area Designer, Jennifer Crawford at 917-8708 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Specialist lm Enclosure cc: DSD_CDRC@Tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson J. Crawford, Tucson Electric Power |
| 05/10/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/10/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 31, 2012 A2 Studio Architecture 4009 E. Poe St. Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: DP12-0038 LITTLE RANCH PRESCHOOL Development Package Dear Aaron Katz: Your submittal of the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 4 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE ROLLED 4 Rolled Copies of Revised Development Package 2 Revised Drainage Statements *** Please Speak to Patricia Gehlen at 837-4919 prior to resubmitting. *** Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via email: akatz@a2arch.com |
| 05/10/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES *** REVISED LETTER *** July 17, 2012 A2 Studio Architecture 4009 E. Poe St. Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: DP12-0038 LITTLE RANCH PRESCHOOL Development Package Dear Aaron Katz: Your submittal of the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 5 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE ROLLED 5 Rolled Copies of Revised Development Package (PDSD2) 2 Revised Drainage Statements (PDSD2) 1 CD of all Plans and Documents (PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via email: akatz@a2arch.com |
| 05/15/2012 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Aaron Katz, AIA DATE: May 21, 2012 4009 E. Poe Street Tucson, Arizona 85711 Subject: Little Ranch Pre-School, 1119 E. Glenn Street Development Package, DP12-0038 (First Review) T13S, R14E, Section 31 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Package and Drainage Statement The Development Package (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Package: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. Relevant case numbers (development package document, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. D.S. 2-01.3.3. When made available. 3. General Notes. The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. D.S. 2-01.3.7. A. Zoning and Land Use Notes. 6. List special exceptions, zoning variances, zoning and development standard modifications, overlay zones, and other reviews that are applicable to the project. a. List special exceptions, variances, and modifications such as Sec. 2.8.10.8, Modification of Development Regulations (MDR), Sec. 5.1.7, Board of Adjustment (BOA), Sec. 5.1.8, Design Review Board (DRB), Sec. 5.1.9, Historical Commission, Sec. 5.1.10, Historic District Advisory Board (HDAB), Sec. 5.3.4 and 5.3.5, a Design Development Option (DDO), 5.3.9 Special Exception Land Uses, Sec. 5.4.1 and General Legislative Procedures, and 5.4.3 Zoning Examiner Legislative Procedure (SE), or DS 1-01.0, Development Standard Modification Request (DSMR), by case number, in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval. b. List overlay zones that are applicable to the property, such as Sec. 2.8.1, Hillside Development Zone (HDZ); Sec. 2.8.2, Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ); Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone; Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone; Sec. 2.8.5, Airport Environs Zone (AEZ); Sec. 2.8.6, Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ); Sec. 2.8.7, Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; Sec. 2.8.8, Historic Preservation Zone (HPZ), 2.8.9 Drachman School Overlay (DSO), or 2.8.10 Rio Nuevo And Downtown (RND) of the LUC; or Sec. 29-12 through 29-19 Watercourse Amenities, Safety, and Habitat (WASH) Ordinance of the Tucson Code, by case number, in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note state that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria, and provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and conditions of approval. If there is more than one (1) lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the overlay zones. Projects involving Historic Preservation Zones, Downtown Heritage Incentive Zones (involving demolition), or overlay zones, require separate review and approval. B. Drainage Notes. List the following notes as appropriate. 2. If applicable, list the following notes and complete the blanks. a. "The following lots are affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations: _________." (List the lots affected by lot number.) In the case of one (1) lot development, substitute the words, "This project is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations." b. "A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificates are required for the following lots: __________." (List the lots affected by lot number, or in the case of a one (1) lot development, place a period after the word "required" and delete the remainder of note. Any work performed in the regulated City of Tucson flood hazard area(s) must have a Floodplain Use Permit. C. Streets and Roads Notes. 1. List the following note if applicable: "All new public roads within and adjacent to this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans will be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval." 3. Provided the following notes as applicable: a. "Total miles of new public streets is ____________. b. Total miles of new private streets is ____________. F. Trails Notes. List the following notes as appropriate. 3. The Eastern Pima County Trails System Master Plan does not show any trails on or adjacent to the development site. 4. Existing Site Conditions. The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within fifty (50) feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of fifty (50) feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. D.S. 2-01.3.8. C. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. E. Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). F. Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown. G. Other significant conditions on the site, such as major rock outcrops, structures, fences, walls, etc., shall be shown. These elements should be indicated in a different line weight than the proposed improvements and labeled "to be removed" or "to be retained." 5. Information on Proposed Development. The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. D.S. 2-01.3.9. H. Proposed traffic circulation: 1. Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Street Development Standard 3-01.0, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), handicap ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and handicap ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. 2. Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. See "redlines" for proper location and addition of exist. SVT's. 4. Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 5. If utilizing parking area access lanes (PAALs), they shall be designed in accordance with Sec. 3.3.0 of the LUC and Development Standard 3-05.0. c. Show all loading zones, and vehicle maneuverability fully dimensioned, and access route, and provide, as a note, the number of loading spaces required, the number provided, and the design vehicle. It is recommended that the refuse vehicle not back-up in a skewed manner from the enclosure if possible. I. Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half (½), to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. Dedication for the intersection widening is required showing the metes and bounds for the ½ ROW transition from 45' to 32' along the property frontage. M. A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The DSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. It appears that with the amount of cut and fill needed to complete the project that a grading plan will be required for this project. N. In conjunction with a drainage report or statement, as applicable, prepared in accordance with the City Engineer's instructions and procedures, the following information will be indicated on the development package documents. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management. 1. Show areas of detention/retention including 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations. A Drainage Statement is required. Also see the special exceptions for specific requirements. 2. Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow. 5. Verification will be provided that any drainage solutions which occur outside the boundaries of the development document area are constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional notarized documentation of that approval will be submitted with the drainage report.) 7. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or onsite runoff discharge points. O. All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. T. Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Development Standard 3-01.0. Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. See comment no. 5.H.5.c. 6. A grading plan submittal and review is required for this project. 7. List the amount of estimated cut and fill on the plans. 8. Further comments may be forth coming depending on the extent of the revisions. 9. See additional comments on the "redlines" on the plan sheets. Include the "redlines" on the re-submittal for comparison. 10. It is suggested that after my comments have been addressed, that you make an appointment with me to discuss any of my comments that you may have questions on. If I missed any information or made a mistake we can go over those items at the meeting. Do not hesitate to call if there are any questions or disagreements on my comments as you address them. Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. Submit a DS that addresses the onsite and the offsite drainage for the proposed improvements. The 5-year threshold retention requirement could be satisfied using 6" depressed landscaped areas depending the design of the project. 3. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and is accepted with the approval of the grading plan. 4. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 5. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS. 6. Final review and acceptance of the DS will done at the grading plan stage. 7. Addendums to any Drainage Statement, Drainage Reports and Hydrology Reports etc. are not accepted. The new layout or the revisions must be incorporated into the approved Drainage Statement. If you have any questions/comments, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/1119 E. Glenn St_DEVPKG-_2-01.0 |
| 05/15/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Little Ranch Preschool Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0037 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 15, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. The project requires Special Exception approval through a Zoning Examiner Full Notice Procedure, Sec. 23A-50 and 23A-53 prior to approval of the development package. If approved revise General Note 5 to include the Special Exception number, date of approval, and any conditions of approval. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: D.S. 2-01.2.4 A title block shall be provided in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. 1. D.S. 2-01.3.2.D Zoning acknowledges that D.S. 2-01.3.2.D states that an administrative street address is to be provided in the title block. After discussion with Pima County Addressing the administrative street address is to be provided adjacent to the title block. That said provide an administrative address adjacent to the title block. 1. D.S. 2-01.3.4.C Label the section corners on the project-location map. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Revise General Note 6 to include "LUC SECTION 2.8.3". 3. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.a Based on the most current aerial photos there are at least four (4) accessory structures located on the northern end of this property. If these structures are to remain show them on the plan and include the square footage in the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation. If they are to be demolished show them on the plan as to be demolished and obtain the required permits. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation that meets the requirements of LUC Section 3.2.11. Per development designator "41" the allowed FAR is 0.50" 5. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E As this site consists of two (2) parcels, 113-08-0740 & 113-08-0760 a lot combination is required. Provide a copy of the approved "Pima County Combination Request Form" or a copy of the recorded "Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property" with your next submittal. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Per LUC Section 3.3.6.6.2 Access lanes and PAALs shall be setback at least two (2) feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction. The additional area is necessary to provide clearance for fire, sanitation, and delivery vehicles. That said provide setback dimensions from the proposed "30" H PARKING SCREEN" to the PAAL at both the one-way PAAL and the PAAL located near the southeast corner of the lot. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide the number of vehicle parking spaces provided in the parking calculation. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Per LUC Section 3.3.6.4.B.2 A motor vehicle off-street parking space shall have a minimum width of ten (10) feet when the side(s) of the parking space abuts a vertical barrier over six (6) inches in height, other than a vertical support for a carport. That said provide a width dimension for the vehicle parking space located in the southeast corner of the site that shows it meets the 10' width or provide a dimension that shows that the proposed "30" H PARKING SCREEN" is at least 1'-6" from the vehicle parking space. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide the number of provided Long-Term bicycle parking in the bicycle parking space calculation. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide a detail for the Short-Term bicycle parking that shows how all requirements of LUC Sections 3.3.9.2 & 3.3.9.3 are met. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide a detail for the Long-Term bicycle parking that shows how all requirements of LUC Sections 3.3.9.2 & 3.3.9.4 are met. It does not appear that the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.4.C have been met. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.J It does not appear that the required 10' landscape boarder is provided at the southeast corner of the lot where the future intersection widening taper is shown. Either design to the future right-of-way intersection widening taper or provide a future site plan that shows how the site will meet code when the right-of-way is taken. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Provide width dimensions for all sidewalks on site. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Demonstrate on the plan how the required accessible routes are maintained within Buildings #1 & #4. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0038 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 05/17/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter and backflow preventer b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned) d. the rim elevation of the upstream cleanout of the public sewer e. the first floor elevation for the building Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 05/17/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The one accessible parking space provided must be "Van Accessible" as per the 2006 IBC, Section 1106.5 and ICC A117.1, section 502.2. 2. For all new and existing accessible routes, please confirm and show slope compliance as required by ICC A117.1, Section 403.3. 3. Please show location of accessible parking signage and provide a large scale detail of the signage required. 4. Please show a large scale detail of the marked crossing to Glenn street. Please show all accessible requirements such as dimensions, widths, ramps, detectable warning strips and markings. 5. Please provide a large scale detail of the dual ramp system and stairs at existing building 3. Please show all accessible requirements such as grade elevations, slopes, step riser and treads, handrails, slopes and all required landings at top and bottom of all steps and ramps. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/18/2012 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 05/22/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the plans as requested by other agencies and as necessary comply with any conditions of the Special Exception case. 2) Fifty (50) percent or more of the area of the street landscape border at Glenn Street must be covered with shrubs or vegetative ground cover. The required ground coverage must be achieved within two (2) years from the date of planting. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.5. Provide the coverage calculations on the plan. 3) All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved shall be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with an inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution. Revise landscape plan to identify the type and locations proposed for inert ground cover materials or seeded areas. A minimum two-inch layer is required around planting areas. LUC 3.7.2.7. DS 2-06.5.2.C 4) The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. Revise the plans to clarify compliance. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4 5) Submit a native plant preservation plan or Application for Exception. LUC 3.8 http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/NPPOapp.pdf 6) Grading, hydrology, and landscape structural plans are to be integrated to make maximum use of site storm water runoff for supplemental on-site irrigation purposes. The landscape plan shall indicate use of all runoff, from individual catch basins around single trees to basins accepting flow from an entire vehicular use area or roof area. LUC 3.7.4.3.B |
| 05/22/2012 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT DP12-0038 Little Ranch_GlennSt. () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: SE12-62 Little Ranch_GlennSt NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Cragin-Keeling Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: May 22, 2012 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER:msp 791-5505 DATE: 05/22/12 Planning and Development Services Department Community Planning Section DP12 038 - Little Ranch ChildCareCenter - Glenn Street May 22, 2012 Based on the applicant's request, a concurrent review for both Special Exception SE12-62, and development plan DP12-0038 is in process. Prior to the approval of the proposed development plan, the approval of Special Exception SE-12-62 by Mayor and Council is required. Approval of the proposed development plan requires full compliance with SE-12-62 Special Exception conditions. Staff's comments are subject to change based on Mayor and Council's approval of SE-12-62. Prior to resubmittal of development plan DP12-0038, the applicant shall make all necessary revision, if necessary, to comply with all SE-12-62 conditions. Staff offers the following comments: 1. Prior to development plan resubmittal, the proposed development plan shall be in full compliance with Special Exception SE-12-62 conditions. 2. Prior to development plan approval, add as general notes, a section which addresses all of the approved Special Exception SE-12-62 conditions, verbatim as approved by Mayor and Council. 3. If the applicant wishes for the legal non-conforming use of a "petting zoo" to continue on -site as part of the new expansion to the Child Care Center, which requires a Special Exception approval, then the "petting zoo" needs to be part of the written request and identified by location and use on both the SE-12-62 and DP12-0038 package. 4. Site improvements which fall within the criteria of "Area Plans" will include a condition that recommends trash receptors to be a minimum of fifty feet from any residentially used or zoned properties. Staff has made this request on SE-12-62, for Mayor and Council to consider. If approved, the development plan will need to be revised to meet this condition and staff recommends the applicant consider the following two options for possible locations; the trash receptor(s) be located just north of the proposed "drop-off lane," either between buildings #1 & #4, or between buildings # 4 & #5. |
| 05/23/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/23/2012 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 05/24/2012 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP12-0038 LITTLE RANCH PRESCHOOL/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: May 24, 2012 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. 1.) Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) Will the parcels be combined by the Assessor? If so, you may need to retire one of the addressed. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/13/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |