Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP12-0030
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/30/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Jason, This is to acknowledge that the COT Real Estate Program is aware of proposed development plan DP12-0030 within a portion of Block 91, City of Tucson. Said development plan indicates that refuse collection will occur off the southern end of Herbert Avenue, just north of Broadway. There is an active TRE that affects the northern 135’ +/- of Herbert Ave. that leaves the east 8’ of right-of-way (r/w) open for pedestrian use and the balance of the southern portion open for all other r/w uses. The terms of a modified or new TRE are being discussed by all parties to assure that the terms of the existing Development Agreement and the proposed development, as depicted in DP12-0030, will be satisfied to allow for the eventual issuance of a C of O and appropriate shared use of Herbert Avenue. Please continue with your review and keep us apprized of your progress. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact me or Jim Rossi. Hector F. Martinez Director, Real Estate Program City of Tucson 201 N. Stone Ave. - 6th Flr. P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, AZ 85726-7210 Hector.Martinez@tucsonaz.gov Phone (520) 837-6708 Fax (520) 791-5641 |
| 04/02/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: DP12-0030 Plaza Centro Greyhound Development Package TRANSMITTAL: 04/02/2012 DUE DATE: 04/04/12 COMMENTS: 1. The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. DS 2-01.3.7.A.6 This project did not require a DRB review, therefore remove general note # 15 and the RND #12-04 reference number from all sheets. This project does require an IID review, provide the case number (T12SA00062), date of approval, what was approved and the conditions of approval as a general note. Provide a copy of the approval letter from the Director of PDSD. Provide in the lower right corner of all sheets the case number (T12SA00062). 3. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Clearly indicate the location of the short term bicycle parking spaces on the development plan sheet 1 of 10. Provide keynote, etc. The classification of class one and class 2 bicycle parking are no longer being used, they are now termed short term and long term bicycle parking. Revise. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentpackage\D12-0030dp.doc |
| 04/02/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/02/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/02/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The only plan that shows accessible routes and pedestrian ways is the Landscape Plan, Sheet L-1. This plan however, does not address 2006 IBC, ICC A117.1, 2003 Edition accessibility requirements such as: a. Identified Accessible Routes with dimensions and slopes. b. Accessible ramps and their slopes, handrails and landings. c. Stairs and their risers, treads and handrails. d. Access through the pool fencing and their gates which is not shown on the drawings. 2. Please provide a large scale detailed plan of the pool and courtyard area showing all accessible requirements including all accessible routes, ramps, handrails, stairs, pool fencing, gates, all slopes and dimensions. a. Please indicate the use of the pool and courtyard as public, semi-public or private. 3. All accessibility requirements outside the boundaries of the property lines are as per COT DOT accessibility standards. END OF REVIEW |
| 04/02/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/03/2012 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | April 3, 2012 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP12-0030 PROJECT NAME: Plaza Centro Greyhound PROJECT ADDRESS: Congress-Broadway PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Package; therefore revisions are required for re-submittal. The following items must be addressed or added to the plan set. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 1. The proposed 14' driveway along Congress Street at Herbert Avenue will conflict with the existing crosswalk at the signalized intersection and the existing TRE along Herbert Avenue. The driveway will need to be removed from the plans. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/03/2012 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP12-0030 PLAZA CENTRO GREYHOUND/ REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: April 3, 2012 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. |
| 04/04/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | This project does require an IID review, provide the case number (T12SA00062), date of approval, what was approved and the conditions of approval as a general note. Provide a copy of the approval letter from the Director of PDSD. |
| 04/04/2012 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 April 4, 2012 To: MARTIN MAGELLI BAKER & ASSOC. ENGINEERING Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: PlAZA CENTRO GREYHOUND Development Plan – 2nd submittal DP12-0030 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 04/04/2012 | JWILLIA4 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Date Case Number Project Address April 4, 2012 DP12-0030 PLAZA CENTRO GREYHOUND Development Plan Comments: Denied, The proposed development plan for the Plaza Centro Greyhound, Case No. DP12-0030, doses not meet the minimum requirements for Environmental Services, Solid Waste and Recycle materials Disposal Standard 6-01. The proposed development plan for the Plaza Centro Greyhound, Case No. DP12-0030, must meet the minimum requirements for Environmental Services, in order to provided Solid Waste and Recycle disposal services. If the developer dose not meet the minimum standards a DSMR must be submitted and approved be for approval of the development plan can be obtained. The following comments are the minimum requirements that must be meet if a DSMR is not approved: 1 The Development Plan must include Solid Waste and Recycle containers and must be shown and labeled on the site plan. Containers shown on plans must be labeled for their intended us being Solid Waste or Recycle Disposal. 2. All Solid Waste and Recycle containers shown on plans must show enclosures with gates installed and mounted on the end of the CMU walls or mounted on separate post as show on Solid Waste Standards No. 6-01. If the condition of the wall enclosure does not allow the gates to be mounted on the end of the wall the width of the enclosures must be increased by and addition one (1’) foot. 3. Bollards must be added to the enclosure as shown on Solid Waste Standards No. 6-01. 4. A Detail of the proposed container enclosure must be shown on the plans as required by Solid Waste Standards No. 6-01. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/04/2012 | JWILLIA4 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Date Case Number Project Address April 10, 2012 DP12-0030 PLAZA CENTRO GREYHOUND Development Plan Comments: Environmental Services, will hereby approve the Proposed Development plan Case No.DP12-0030, for the Plaza Centro-Greyhound and the required DSMR. With the flowing condition. A note must be added to the development plan stating the Following: "The site constrains resulting from limited space and accessibility for Solid Waste and Recycle Disposal Vehicles service, will require that Environmental Services provide a Two-man service route for this development." Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/10/2012 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 10, 2012 Lisa Bowers Metro Tucson Expediting & Development 2940 N. Swan Road Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: DP12-0030 PLAZA CENTRO GREYHOUND Development Package Dear Lisa: The above referenced Development Package has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee. Once the necessary corrections are made, please submit the following documents for sign-off. 1 Rolled COMPLETE SET of the Development Package. Please include applicable sheets from any other concurrent reviews. 1 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan (if applicable). Additional print copies will be made from the complete set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City’s contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your plans to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. Plans will not be signed and released until the CDRC office has been notified by PC Addressing that all fees for this plan have been paid. The CDRC office will need this confirmation in writing. A Development Package remains valid for a period of three (3) years from the date of approval. This Development Package will expire on 04/10/2015 per LUC 5.3.8.2.B. PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/CDRC___Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC_Stamp/cdrc_stamp.html BLUELINE SETS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE STAMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR CORRECTION. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Delivered Over Counter |