Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP12-0030
Parcel: 11706175A

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG

Permit Number - DP12-0030
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
03/09/2012 JGREEN2 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
03/09/2012 PGEHLEN1 OTHER AGENCIES SOUTHWEST GAS Passed
03/13/2012 JENNIFER STEPHENS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

AUDREY FARENGA
ADDRESSING REVIEW
PH #: 740-6800
FAX #: 623-5411


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW
SUBJECT: DP12-0030 PLAZA CENTRO GREYHOUND/DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: March 12, 2012



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

1. Delete 2 N. Fourth Avenue on the Address Block.
2. Include a brief legal description on all title blocks.
3. Include the correct book and page 65/38 of Plaza Centro Garage on sheet 1.
03/14/2012 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Passed
03/14/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the site drawing to show the location and size of both the water meter and the reduced pressure backflow preventer assembly. Reference Section 106.3.1, IPC 2006.
2. The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2396.0') is higher than the first floor elevation of the south portion of the building(2398.25') and equal to the first floor elevation of the north portion of the building (2396.0'). Provide a backwater valve per Section 715.1, IPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. Note that fixtures located on levels above the first floor shall not discharge through a backwater valve.
03/14/2012 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: DP12-0030
Plaza Centro Greyhound
Development Package

TRANSMITTAL: 03/14/2012

DUE DATE: 03/19/12

COMMENTS:

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 03/08/13.

2. DS 2-01.2.5 A three (3) inch by five (5) inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for a county approval stamp. Provide on all sheets of the development package.

Move the provided address outside of the 3 X 5 box.

3. DS 2-01.3.3 This project has been assigned case number DP12-0030. Place this number near the lower right corner of all sheets. Provide all relevant case numbers, DRB review, near the lower right corner of all sheets.

4. DS 2-01.3.4 Provide on the location map the section corners.

5. DS 2-01.3.7.A.4 The proposed use "Food and Beverage Sales" in general note #3 appears to be incorrect. Food and Beverage Sales is for the sale of items not to be consumed on the premise. The landscape plan indicates an outdoor eating area. The correct use would be Food Service "36", subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.6.C. Clearly indicate on the site plan (sheet 1 of 9) the outdoor eating area as well as the area to be used for Food Services separate from the retail use area. Revise the parking calculations to reflect the changes in square footage and number of required parking spaces.

6. DS 2-01.3.7.A.6 Provide as a general note (#15) that this project has been designed to meet Sec. 5.1.8, Design Review Board (DRB), provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved and the conditions of approval.

7. DS 2-01.3.8.A Provide the location and recording information for the abandonment of the right of way for Fourth Ave.

8. DS 2-01.3.8.B If applicable, provide the location, width, recordation information, and purpose of all easements.

9. DS 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined.

10. DS 2-01.3.9.H.4 Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

11. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Per LUC Sec. 3.3.4 the ratio for retail use parking is 1:300 revise note on sheet 2 of 9.

Provide parking calculation for the Food Service use at a ratio of 1:100 of GFA per Luc Sec. 3.3.4.

Provide the number of units for the group dwelling use in the parking calculations.

12. DS 2-01.3.9.O Provide dimensions for the building setbacks from either the property lines or the back of future curb whichever is required.

13. DS 2-01.3.9.Q Provide within the footprint of the building the proposed height of the building as well as dimensions of the footprint of the proposed building.

14. DS 2-01.3.9.R Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and the design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0.

The area at the southwest corner of the property indicated as new pavement is also indicated on the grading plan as a pedestrian circulation path. Pavement does meet the requirement of DS 2-08.5.1.C. Revise.

Provide pedestrian circulation path to each adjacent street of this project. Per DS 2-08.4.1.A.

15. DS 2-01.3.9.T Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Development Standard 3-01.0.

Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and
materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Development Standard 6-01.0. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that Standard, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm.

16. DS 2-01.3.9.V Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan.

17. DS 2-01.3.9.W If applicable, indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, freestanding, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met.

18. Because of the type of development proposed (student housing) zoning strongly suggests that bicycle parking be provided.

19. The above comments are a review of sheets 1 & 2 of 9 which are the required site plan for this project. Provide any changes required on the grading and landscape plan as well.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961

TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentpackage\D12-0030dp.doc





03/14/2012

Development Services Department
Zoning Review Section

Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

Comments:

1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed.

2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development package. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal.

3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming.
03/14/2012 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: March 14, 2012
SUBJECT: Plaza Centro-Greyhound Development Plan Package
TO: Metro Tucson Expediting & Development Attn: Lisa Bowers
LOCATION: 350 E Congress Street T14S R13E S12 Ward 1
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP12-0030


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Site Plan, Grading Plan and SWPPP review. The following items need to be addressed:


SITE PLAN: It is recommended that Development Standard 2-01 "Development Package" be reviewed prior to resubmittal. DS Sec.2-02 no longer exists and all reviews fall under DS Sec.2-01 for Development Package. The standard has changes that must be incorporated into the plan sheets for review and approval.

1) DS Sec.2-01.3.2.D: Clarify on the development plan document the administrative address, per the plan set the address is listed as 2 N 4th Ave, however per Permits Plus the address is 350 E Congress St.

2) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The relevant Development Plan Package number (DP12-0030) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets.

3) DS Sec.2-01.3.5: Revise the plan set to include the SWPPP Exhibit within the sheet index on the first sheet of the development plan document and within the development plan package.

4) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.6.b: Revise General Note #9 on the Development Plan Package to reference all special overlay zones that are applicable to this site; specifically state that "the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria for Sec.2.8.4 Gateway Corridor Zone."

5) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Provide a label (public or private, label Broadway as a Gateway Route) and dimensions for the existing right-of-way of all streets, specifically the dimensioned width of existing paving, curbs, curb cuts and sidewalks.

6) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Provide on the development plan document all existing conditions within 50-feet of the site, specifically the existing patio (D11-0010) for the Rialto Theater that has been constructed within the right-of-way of Herbert Ave thru a T.R.E. Clearly label these improvements within the Herbert right-of-way and verify if they may or may not affect the proposed onsite conditions and access for this project.

7) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.F: Revise the development plan document to provide the Improvement Plan reference Number in plan view for all existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site.

8) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the development plan documents, specifically the site plan to show the existing and/or future sight visibility triangles for Herbert Avenue at both Congress and Broadway Blvd. Since both roads act as one-way roads it maybe necessary to reverse the near and far side dimensions for line of sight and traffic visibility.

9) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.J: Revise the development plan package to verify conformance with the future Modern Streetcar Project and public roadway improvement plans that will affect the public right-of-way of Congress St and Broadway Blvd. Refer to R. Bruce Woodruff A.I.A., LEED AP, COTGSD AE Project Manager at 520-837-6310 or bruce.woodruff@tucsonaz.gov for any questions regarding the Modern Streetcar Project.

10) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project.

11) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Provide on the development plan document clearly labeled and dimensioned on-site pedestrian circulation as required per DS Sec.2-08. Provide a pedestrian access route to all adjacent streets meeting the requirements of DS Sec.2-08.4.1.A.

12) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Verify or provide approval through Environmental Services for refuse pickup. Per DS Sec.6-01 onsite refuse collection is required and the development plan package should reflect the location and access to the required refuse container. If Environmental Service is not requiring onsite collection then PDSD Engineering will approve this comment based on their approval of the development plan package.


SWPPP: The SWPPP does not meet the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). Revise the SWPPP according to these comments:

13) Part III.C.2.d: Indicate the percentage of the site that is impervious before and after construction.

14) Part III.C.3.e: Clarify the location of protected storage area (PSA) as shown within the right-of-way of Herbert Ave.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package and SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
03/15/2012 RONALD BROWN ADA REVIEW Denied A meaningful Accessible Review is not possible with the lack of information provided in this development package submittal. There are no architectural site plans showing the proposed design development.
END OF REVIEW
03/15/2012 JOSE ORTIZ COT NON-DSD TRAFFIC Denied March 14, 2012
ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP12-0030
PROJECT NAME: Plaza Centro Greyhound
PROJECT ADDRESS: Congress-Broadway
PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer

Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Package; therefore revisions are required for re-submittal. The following items must be addressed or added to the plan set.

1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed.

2. Sheet 4 of 9 Note 9 - add 'FOR BARRICADING IN THE PUBLI RIGHT-OF-WAY CONTACT TDOT-TRAFFIC ENGINEERING AT 791-4259 TO OBTAIN A BARRICADE PERMIT'.

3. Sheet 4 of 9 - edit note to include the contractors' responsibility to maintain all public R/W improvements such as existing traffic control devises, streetcar equipment, and street lights.

4. Ensure that pedestrian areas within the public R/W along Congress and Broadway remain a minimum width of 6-feet.

5. On-site parking is not available for residents and commercial visitors so TDOT has concerns with pedestrians jaywalking to access the parking garage north of Congress. Ensure that the development discourages this behavior with wayfinding signs to direct pedestrians to existing crosswalks, limit pedestrian facilities at the Y of the Broadway/Congress intersection, or provide an overhead pedestrian corridor between this development and the existing parking garage.

6. Additional coordination with Mo El-Ali of TDOT is required prior to final acceptance of the development.

7. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the public right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov
03/15/2012 KBROUIL1 COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
03/16/2012 LIZA CASTILLO UTILITIES TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER Approved 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714
Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702


WR#247409 March 15, 2012

Baker and Associates Engineering
Attn: Martin Magelli
3561 E Sunrise Dr #225
Tucson, Arizona 85718

Dear Mr. Magelli :

SUBJECT: Plaza Centro Greyhound
DP12-0030

Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted March 9, 2012. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development.

Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer.

In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans.

If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to:
Tucson Electric Power Company
Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington
New Business Project Manager
P. O. Box 711 (DB-101)
Tucson, AZ 85702
520-917-8726

Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244.

Sincerely,


Elizabeth Miranda
Office Support Specialist
Design/Build
lm
Enclosures
cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email)
M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power
03/16/2012 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied Address the following comments pertaining to DOWNTOWN AREA INFILL INCENTIVE DISTRICT ZONE:

Landscaping and Screening.

a. Except as required by Sec. 2.8.12.6.B. (Development Transition), a complete or partial exception to the Landscaping and Screening Requirements (Sec. 3.7) may be granted when shade is provided for pedestrians and customers, such as along sidewalks, pedestrian circulation paths, and outdoor patios, consistent with Development Standard 9-10.4.3.B.1 (Pedestrian
Pathways in the RND).

b. The following types of landscaping and improvements may be used to comply with Sec. 2.8.12.4.C.6.a (Landscaping and Screening):

" Existing landscaping;
" Shade trees in the right-of-way;
" Green walls or green roofs; and/or
" Shade structures, such as awnings.

Development Standard 9-10.4.3.B.1 Shade shall be provided for at least fifty (50) percent of all sidewalks and pedestrian pathways as measured at 2:00 p.m. on June 21 when the sun is 82° above the horizon (based on 32°N Latitude). Shade may be provided by arcades, canopies, or shade structures, provided they respect the historic and design context of the street and the architectural integrity of the building. Deciduous trees, as proposed in the Downtown Comprehensive Street Tree Plan, are encouraged to supplement existing evergreen trees.
The use of plantings and shade structures in the City right-of-way is permitted to meet this standard. The shade provided by a building may
serve to meet this guideline.

2. Along pedestrian pathways that lead to the areas planned for retail and entertainment uses and high pedestrian traffic, shade devices should be provided at pedestrian waiting areas and street intersections.

Include with re-submittal DRB approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the development plan package, the case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed.

Ensure that all Zoning and Engineering comments and concerns are addressed.

The site, grading and landscape plans must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between plans. Ensure that all changes are reflected on the landscape plan.

Additional comments may apply
03/16/2012 JWILLIA4 ENV SVCS REVIEW Denied Date Case Number Project Address
March 16, 2012 DP12-0030 PLAZA CENTRO GREYHOUND
Development Plan

Comments: Denied,
The proposed development plan for the Plaza Centro Greyhound,
Case No. DP12-0030, dose not the meet the minimum requirements for
Environmental Services, Solid Waste and Recycle materials Disposal Standard 6-01.

1 The Development Plan must include Solid Waste and Recycle containers and must
be shown and labeled on the site plan. Containers shown on plans must be
labeled for their intended us being Solid Waste or Recycle Disposal.

2. All Solid Waste and Recycle containers shown on plans must show enclosures with
gates installed and mounted on the end of the CMU walls or mounted on separate
post as show on Solid Waste Standards No. 6-01. If the condition of the wall
enclosure does not allow the gates to be mounted on the end of the wall the width of
the enclosures must be increased by and addition one (1’) foot.

3. Bollards must be added to the enclosure as shown on Solid Waste
Standards No. 6-01.

4. A Detail of the proposed container enclosure must be shown on the plans as
required by Solid Waste Standards No. 6-01.


Environmental Services Department
Development Plan Review
Reviewer: Tony Teran
Office Phone (520) 837-3706
E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov
03/16/2012 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied PIMA COUNTY
REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT
201 NORTH STONE AVENUE
TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207
JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500
DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135


March 16, 2012

To: MARTIN MAGELLI
BAKER & ASSOC. ENGINEERING

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department


____________________________________________
From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department

Subject: PlAZA CENTRO GREYHOUND
Development Plan – 1st submittal
DP12-0030

The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use:

1. Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD’s Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at:

http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits

The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office.


2. Sheet 3: Call out New MH #1 as public.

3. Sheet 3: PDEQ will require a private manhole at the end of the 8” private BCS.

This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet.

The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.





cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________
Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager
DLU Project folder

Ref. A. Development Plan Checklist Requirements – Chapter 18.71 of the Pima County Code - Section J
http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf

Ref. C - Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapters 5 & 9 (R18-5-205)
http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-05.htm
and (R-18-9-E301)
http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-09.htm

Ref. D - PCRWRD Procedures, Preliminary Sewer Layout Requirements, 1984 (revised April 1988)
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/procedures.pdf

Ref. E - PCRWRD Design Standards for Public Sewerage Facilities, 1983 (revised April 1988)
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/design_standards.pdf

Ref. F - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/all_det.pdf

Ref. G - Pima County Code of Ordinances, Title 13 - Public Services, Division II - Sewers
http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=16119&stateID=3&statename=Arizona

Ref. H - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, 2003 Edition
http://dot.pima.gov/transeng/stdspecsdet/standardspecs2003.pdf

Ref. I - PCRWRD Engineering Directives
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/directives/
03/16/2012 JOHN WILLIAMS ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

March 16, 2012

Lisa Bowers
Metro Tucson Expediting & Development
2940 N. Swan Road #212
Tucson, Arizona 85712

Subject: DP12-0030 PLAZA CENTRO GREYHOUND Development Package

Dear Lisa:

Your submittal of March 9, 2012 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 10 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED

10 Copies Revised Development Package (Addressing, Plumbing, Zoning HC, Zoning, Engineering, Traffic, Env Svcs, Landscape, Wastewater, PDSD)

2 Copies Revised SWPPP Documents (Engineering, PDSD)

2 Copies DRB Approval Documentation (Landscape, PDSD)

1 CD With Copies of All Documents Listed Above.

1 Check Made out to “Pima County Treasurer” for $50.00 (Wastewater)

Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893.

Sincerely,


John Williams
Planning Technician

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
03/16/2012 JWILLIA4 OUT TO CUSTOMER Passed
03/16/2012 JWILLIA4 REJECT SHELF Passed
03/16/2012 JWILLIA4 APPROVAL SHELF Completed