Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Permit Number - DP12-0027
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/14/2012 | RONALD BROWN | HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/16/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Comment not resolved; revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter and backflow preventer b. the location of the main water lines c. the invert and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes and cleanouts Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 05/30/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 502 W. Ajo Retail Center Development Package (2nd Review) DP12-0027 TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 30, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This plan was reviewed for full code compliance for the areas of expansion and change only. 2. This comment was not addressed. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan with the next submittal. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. This comment was not addressed correctly. Per LUC Section 2.5.4.2.B.3 General Merchandise Sales "31", is only subject to: Sec. 3.5.9.2.A. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. That said the "Proposed use: Commercial" is not a use but a use group. 2. Under General Notes D. Utility notes there is text over text that makes this section very difficult to read. Please remove the text over text and resubmit. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Per LUC Section 3.2.11.2.C.2.d A deed for the area or a legally binding agreement to dedicate or sell at nominal cost to the City is submitted as part of the application. That said the prior MS&R dedication cannot be use in the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Per LUC Section 3.2.3.2.B, Development Designator "31" lot coverage is not applicable. Remove the lot coverage from the plan. 5. It does not appear that the Pima County Lot Combination form has been processed by the Pima County Assessor's Office. Provide a copy of the approved lot combination once approved by the Pima County Assessor's Office. D.S. 2-01.3.8.A This project comprises at least three (3) possibly four (4) parcels and will require a lot combination prior to approval of the development package. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Lot Combination form or a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property with your next submittal. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 A back-up spur is required at the west end of the vehicle parking spaces shown along the south side of the building, i.e. adjacent to the proposed accessible vehicle parking spaces. The back-up spur should have minimum distance of three (3) feet provided between the back of spur and any wall, screen or other obstruction over six (6) inches in height. That said from the back of spur to the property line should be a minimum of three (3) feet. 7. This comment was not addressed, no bollards are shown on the plan. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Provide some type of barrier to prevent access to the 16' alley shown along the north side of the property, see LUC Section 3.3.6.11. 8. This comment was not addressed D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The vehicle parking space calculation cannot be verified until the uses are clarified. Also as you have elected to use the new vehicle parking calculations they apply to the entire site. 9. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d As you have elected to use the new vehicle parking space requirements than the new LUC Section 3.3.8.2.B Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces requirements apply to the entire site. Provide a Short-Term & Long-Term bicycle parking space calculation on the plan. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Per LUC Section 3.3.9.3.B.1 Location. Short-term bicycle parking shall be; 1. Within fifty (50) feet of each public entrance to a building as measured along the most direct pedestrian route. 2. Clearly visible from the adjacent sidewalks, drives, and/or public entrance(s); and, 3. Where buildings have more than one public entrance or a site has more than one building, short-term bicycle parking shall be distributed so that at least one (1) short-term bicycle parking space is within fifty (50) feet of each public entrance. That said the proposed location shown on detail 8 sheet 4 does not meet these requirements. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Detail 8 Sheet 4, The single inverter "U" rack shown does not allow for the three (3) required Short-term bicycle parking spaces. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Remove all Class I and Class II references from the plan as they are no longer applicable. 13. This comment was not addressed. Under Site Development Plan Data, the east perimeter yard setback shows 10 ft. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O The east perimeter yard setback requirement shown is not correct. This setback should be 21' or the height of the building exterior wall, which ever is greater, measured to the nears edge of travel lane. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0027 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, last approved site plan, approved Pima County Lot Combination form or a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property. |
| 05/31/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The following comments apply because previous approved site and/or landscape plans for reference where not provided. Include the following information: " Location, size, and name of existing and new vegetation. See note #16 on Site Plan Keynotes Sheet 2 of 4 " Both the proper and common name of each type of plant material. " A water-conserving irrigation system is required for all new landscape plantings LUC 3.7.4.5.A 1. Note: Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B. 2. A 5' wall is required to screen new vehicle use area from adjacent residential properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 3. A interior landscape border is required along site boundaries of the adjacent residential properties per LUC Table 3.7.2-I 4. One (1) canopy tree must be provided for every thirty-three (33) linear feet of landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4. 5. Within the new vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each 4 motor vehicle parking spaces and every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk) per LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1. 6. Ensure that all zoning comments and concerns are addressed. 7. Additional comments may apply. |
| 06/05/2012 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: BRAMIC Design Group DATE: June 7, 2012 6255 N. Cam. Pimeria Alta Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: Retail Center, 502 W. Ajo Way Development Package, DP12-0027 (Second Rev) T14S, R13E, Section 25 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Package. The Development Package (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Package: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. (20.) Information on Proposed Development. The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. D.S. 2-01.3.9. T. Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Development Standard 3-01.0. Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Development Standard 6-01.0. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that Standard, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. Alley access is not allowed. Obtain permission from TDOT for alley access to the refuse enclosure. Per previous comment. Per our previous discussions at the counter; the vehicle exiting from the drive-thru lane using the min. ASHTO requirements of a 24' outside radius and an inside radius of a 13.5'cannot exit onto Clark Ave. headed south without encroaching onto opposing traffic (see redlines). Perhaps using an extruded curb or landscape island to direct traffic to exit perpendicular onto Clark Ave. may eliminate encroachment onto opposing traffic. Revise as necessary. Drainage Statement: 1. The DS has been accepted by engineering. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/502 W. Ajo Way_DEV-SITE 2 |