Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - DP12-0027
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/13/2012 | KBROUIL1 | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/13/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/19/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 502 W. Ajo Retail Center Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0027 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 22, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This plan was reviewed for full code compliance for the areas of expansion and change only. 2. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan with the next submittal. The following comments are based on Development Package Submittal Requirements: 1. The drawing order is not correct. Provide a cover sheet for the development package that meets the requirements of D.S. 2-01.0 and the Development Package Submittal Requirements 2. The paving and grading plan should follow the site plan. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. D.S. 2-01.3.2.D Zoning acknowledges that D.S. 2-01.3.2.D states that an administrative street address is to be provided in the title block. After discussion with Pima County Addressing the administrative street address is to be provided adjacent to the title block. That said provide an administrative address adjacent to the title block. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development package number, DP12-0027 adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. That said the "Proposed use: Commercial" is not a use but a use group. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Clarify what use is subject to LUC Sections 3.5.9.2A & 3.5.13.5 as shown under the "Development Designator "31". 5. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Based on the drive-thru shown on the plan it appears that Food Service may be proposed. If so list Food Service as a proposed use. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Provide a general note that states "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE" 7. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.a The "Covered Walkway" shown under "Building S.F. Calculation" does not count toward building square footage, remove it from the plan. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Until all proposed uses are listed the allowed Floor Area Ratio (FAR) cannot be verified. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c The provided building expansion calculation does not appear to be correct. It appears that the "Covered Walkway" has been included as part of the existing square footage. Revise the existing square footage so that it does not include the covered walkway square footage. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.8.A This project comprises at least three (3) possibly four (4) parcels and will require a lot combination prior to approval of the development package. Provide a copy of the approved Pima County Lot Combination form or a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property with your next submittal. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.2 It appears that vehicles sitting in the drive-thru will encroach into the sight visibility triangles (SVTs). Show the require stacking on sheet 1 of 3. The stacking spaces should start at the southern most drive-thru window, as shown on sheet A3.0, and run south. As the proposed use for the drive-thru has not been provided the required number of stacking spaces cannot be determined. The SVT's may not be shown correctly, contact your engineering reviewer for the correct location. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 A back-up spur is required at the west end of the vehicle parking spaces shown along the south side of the building, i.e. adjacent to the proposed accessible vehicle parking spaces. The back-up spur should have minimum distance of three (3) feet provided between the back of spur and any wall, screen or other obstruction over six (6) inches in height. That said from the back of spur to the property line should be a minimum of three (3) feet. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Provide some type of barrier to prevent access to the 16' alley shown along the north side of the property, see LUC Section 3.3.6.11. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The vehicle parking space calculation cannot be verified until the uses are clarified. Also as you have elected to use the new vehicle parking calculations the apply to the entire site. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a As a restrip of existing paved area is proposed and new vehicle parking spaces are proposed, provide a typical parking space detail for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. Ensure that the detail provides a dimension for the location of the wheel stops shown on the plan. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The proposed plan shows vehicle parking located within the right-of-way. Unless shown on the last approved site plan this parking cannot count toward required parking. 17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.c The vehicle parking space calculation cannot be verified until the uses are clarified and the last approved site plan is provided. 18. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d As you have elected to use the new vehicle parking space requirements than the new LUC Section 3.3.8.2.B Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces requirements apply to the entire site. Provide a Short-Term & Long-Term bicycle parking space calculation on the plan. Unit the uses are clarified the requirements cannot be verified. 19. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O The east perimeter yard setback requirement shown is not correct. This setback should be 21' or the height of the building exterior wall, which ever is greater, measured to the nears edge of travel lane. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0027 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, last approved site plan, approved Pima County Lot Combination form or a recorded Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property. |
| 03/22/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET 1 OF 3 1. As per Table 1106.1 of the 2006 IBC, 3 accessible parking spaces are required for parking quantities of 51-75. Please add anotheraccessible parking space. a. One of these spaces must be "Van Accessible". b. Please provide signage showing the "Van Accessible" signage. 2. At the front of the building, please provide a marked crossing connection to the Clark Av. pedestrian way so the new accessible parking space will have an accessible route not only to the public right of way but also an accessible route connection for the North and South sides of the facility. 3. Please provide a detectable warning strip at the east end of the marked crossing as per ICC A117.1, Section 406.12, 13 and 14. 4. The accessible parking aisle sidewalk landing and ramp design shown on both sheets 1 and 2 of 3 does not work with the floor plan layout of Sheet A1.0. There are several building columns that are in conflict with the ramp system. a. Please provide a large scale detail of the new accessible parking layout showing the third accessible parking space and how access is gained from the parking aisles to the accessible route. b. Please show on the large scale detail all required accessible dimensions, slopes, signage, ramps, aisles and markings. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter and backflow preventer b. the location of the main water lines c. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned) d. the location of the building connection to the public sewer e. the invert and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes and cleanouts Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 03/29/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide previous approved site and landscape plans for reference. If no plans exist then this submittal will become the document of record. Provide the following information if necessary: " Location, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place. " Both the proper and common name of each type of plant material. Note: Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B 2. Ensure that all zoning comments and concerns are addressed 3. Additional comments may apply |
| 03/30/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/11/2012 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: BRAMIC Design Group DATE: April 18, 2012 6255 N. Cam. Pimeria Alta Tucson, Arizona 85718 Subject: Retail Center, 502 W. Ajo Way Development Package, DP12-0027 (First Review) T14S, R13E, Section 25 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Package and Drainage Statement The Development Package (DP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Package: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. A three (3) inch by five (5) inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. D.S. 2-01.2.5. 3. The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. D.S. 2-01.2.7. 4. A legend that shows and describes all symbols used on the drawing is to be provided, preferably on the first sheet. D.S. 2-01.2.9. 5. The title block shall include the following information. D.S. 2-01.3.2. A. The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name. B. A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a re-subdivision are to be provided. On re-subdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat. D. The administrative street address. 6. The project-location map shall cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. D.S. 2-01.3.4. A. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area. B. Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property. C. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 7. General Notes. The following general notes are required. Additional notes specific to each plan are required where applicable. D.S. 2-01.3.7. 6. List special exceptions, zoning variances, zoning and development standard modifications, overlay zones, and other reviews that are applicable to the project. b. List overlay zones that are applicable to the property, such as Sec. 2.8.1, Hillside Development Zone (HDZ); Sec. 2.8.2, Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ); Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone; Sec. 2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone; Sec. 2.8.5, Airport Environs Zone (AEZ); Sec. 2.8.6, Environmental Resource Zone (ERZ); Sec. 2.8.7, Downtown Heritage Incentive Zone; Sec. 2.8.8, Historic Preservation Zone (HPZ), 2.8.9 Drachman School Overlay (DSO), or 2.8.10 Rio Nuevo And Downtown (RND) of the LUC; or Sec. 29-12 through 29-19 Watercourse Amenities, Safety, and Habitat (WASH) Ordinance of the Tucson Code, by case number, in lower right corner of each sheet. As a general note state that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone(s) criteria, and provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and conditions of approval. If there is more than one (1) lot within the site, the note should specify which lots are affected by the overlay zones. Projects involving Historic Preservation Zones, Downtown Heritage Incentive Zones (involving demolition), or overlay zones, require separate review and approval. 7. If the property is subject to annexation requirements, provide the applicable C9-__-__ or C15-__-__ annexation file number, in the lower right corner of each sheet. List the conditions of approval as a note. 8. If the property is part of a subdivision plat that is being reviewed or has been recorded, provide the subdivision name and file number (S[YR]-___), in the lower right corner of each sheet. Indicate whether the project is part of a Residential Cluster Project (RCP), condominium, or another similar type project. If this plan is a separate drawing from the plat, indicate the subdivision plat file number (S[YR]- ___) in the lower right corner of each sheet. Complete the DP12-0027. B. Drainage Notes. List the following notes as appropriate. 1. Add the following notes to the grading plan notes: " "Any engineering work to be done below grade (i.e. toe-downs, cutoff walls, drainage pipes/structures, etc.) shall not be back filled until Development Services Inspector inspects the work and approves it." C. Streets and Roads Notes. 1. List the following note if applicable: "All new public roads and improvements within and adjacent to this project will be constructed in accordance with approved plans. Construction plans will be submitted to the City Engineer's Office for review and approval." " This comment is not to be listed on the DP. It is for the consultant to verify the proposed improvements in the ROW are acceptable. 1. A permit or a private improvement agreement might be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 2. Sidewalks along the entire frontage of the project will be required. 20. Existing Site Conditions. The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within fifty (50) feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of fifty (50) feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. D.S. 2-01.3.8. C. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks. E. Indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). 1. For land that slopes less than approximately one (1) percent, contour lines shall be drawn at intervals of not more than one (1) foot. Spot elevations shall be provided at all breaks in grade and along all drainage channels or swales and at selected points not more than one hundred (100) feet apart in all directions. 2. For land that slopes between approximately one (1) percent and five (5) percent, contour lines shall be drawn at intervals of not more than two (2) feet. 3. For land that slopes more than five (5) percent, contour line intervals shall be drawn at five (5) foot intervals. If the property is under the applicability of the Hillside Development Zone (HDZ), the contour lines are to be drawn at intervals which satisfy the specific requirements of the HDZ and Development Standard 9-01.0. 4. If applicable, protected peaks and ridges shall be delineated on the plan/plat. F. Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown. G. Other significant conditions on the site, such as major rock outcrops, structures, fences, walls, etc., shall be shown. These elements should be indicated in a different line weight than the proposed improvements and labeled "to be removed" or "to be retained." I. Floodplain information, including the location of the 100-year flood limits for all flows of one hundred (100) cfs or more with 100-year flood water surface elevations, shall be indicated. H. Conditions on adjacent land significantly affecting the design of the project will be shown, such as the approximate direction and gradients of ground slope; character and location of adjacent development; and drainageways, arroyos, ditches, and channels, including their existing conditions. 21. Information on Proposed Development. The following information on the proposed project shall be shown on the drawing or added as notes. D.S. 2-01.3.9. E. Proposed land splits or existing lot lines shall be drawn on the plan with dimensions and the identification number and approximate square footage of each lot. (Please be aware that, if land division occurs and the number of lots falls within the definition of subdivision, a subdivision plat is required.) H. Proposed traffic circulation: 1. Proposed traffic circulation will be designed in accordance with Street Development Standard 3-01.0, to include streets, intersections, street names, right-of-way widths, curve radii of centerlines and curb returns, and proposed improvements, such as pavement, curbs, access points (driveways), handicap ramps, and sidewalks. Street improvements, such as sidewalks, curbs, pavement, and handicap ramps, do not need to be drawn on the plan if such information is provided on typical street cross sections. See additional "red lines" on the plan set. 2. Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. On a MS and R street, the future curb location is figured out by using the mid-block ROW width. 3. Indicate fire circulation, including accessibility and vehicle maneuverability. 4. Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. I. Show all right-of-way dedications on or abutting the site and label. If the development package documents have been prepared in conjunction with a subdivision plat or is required as a condition of approval of a review process, such as a rezoning, street dedications in accordance with the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan may be required by these processes. Projects bounded by streets having only a portion of the right-of-way width dedicated will be required to dedicate right-of-way, up to one-half (½), to complete the street width. Should there be any proposed street or alley vacation, provide this information. If vacation has occurred, include the recording information. J. If street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of -way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) M. A conceptual grading plan is required on projects with significant topographic conditions. The DSD Engineering Administrator or designee will determine the need for such a plan. A specific grading plan is not required, however minimal grading information shall be shown on the plans i.e.: drainage patterns, s/w scupper locations etc. N. In conjunction with a drainage report or statement, as applicable, prepared in accordance with the City Engineer's instructions and procedures, the following information will be indicated on the development package documents. For additional information regarding drainage standards, see the City of Tucson Standards Manual for Drainage Design and Floodplain Management. 2. Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow. 3. Provide locations and types of drainage structures, such as, but not limited to, drainage crossings an pipe culverts. 4. Indicate all proposed ground elevations at different points on each lot to provide reference to future grading and site drainage. 5. Verification will be provided that any drainage solutions which occur outside the boundaries of the development document area are constructed with adjacent owners' permission. (Additional notarized documentation of that approval will be submitted with the drainage report.) 7. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or onsite run-off discharge points. O. All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. R. Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and the design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0. S. Show on-site pedestrian refuge areas per Development Standard 3-05. T. Show existing or proposed pedestrian circulation along abutting rights-of-way. Such sidewalks must comply with accessibility requirements for the physically disabled and the design criteria in Development Standard 3-01.0. Show refuse collection areas, including locations of dumpsters, screening location and materials, and vehicle maneuverability, fully dimensioned, and access route. If dumpster service is not proposed, indicate type of service. For specific information on refuse collection, refer to Development Standard 6-01.0. Refuse collection on all projects shall be designed based on that Standard, even if collection is to be contracted to a private firm. W. Indicate the locations and types of proposed signs (wall, free-standing, pedestal) to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements and that minimal locational requirements can be met. Indicate if there are any existing billboards on site. Compliance to LUC Sec. 3.5.4.26 may be required. Drainage Statement: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS. 2. A Drainage Statement is a brief description of drainage conditions applicable for a site which are not affected by 100 year flows of 100 cfs, of more……per S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.1.2. The DS must be submitted along with the site plan and accepted with the approval of the grading plan. 3. The content and format of the Drainage Statement should follow S.M.D.D.F.M., chap. II, 2.2. 4. Show the project address or administration address on the cover sheet of the DS. 5. If applicable, add the basin(s) maintenance responsibility note and checklist per S.M.D.D.F.M. 2.3.1.6 C 1 and 2 to the DS. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/502 W. Ajo Way_DEV-SITE |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/26/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |