Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - DP12-0024
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/08/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/09/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/12/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please relocate the accessible parking and opposite end marked crossing curb ramp so as to provide, as close as possible, a perpendicular marked crossing. 2. The two curb ramps at the Broadway Blvd. marked crossing do not comply with ICC A 117.1, Section 406.3; flared side slopes shall be no more than 1:10. a. The most northerly ramp could have return curbs in leiu of the flared sides. 3. The pedestrian route to the dumpster is not required to be accessible. Please remove this access as an accessible route. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/16/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Freddy's Custard & Steakburger Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0024 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 19, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan with the next submittal. The following comments are based on Development Package Submittal Requirements: 1. The drawing order is not correct. Provide a cover sheet for the development package that meets the requirements of D.S. 2-01.0 and the Development Package Submittal Requirements 2. The paving and grading plan should follow the site plan. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. D.S. 2-01.3.2.B Provide a brief legal description within the title block on all sheets. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E. Provide the number of total pages on each sheet. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development package number, DP12-0024 adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. That said the proposed use should be listed as "FOOD SERVICE "30", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.4.6.C AND SEC. 3.5.13.5". 5. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Provide a general note that states "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE & SEC. 2.8.4, GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE" 6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b The allowed Floor Area Ratio (FAR) shown on sheet T1.1 is not correct. Per development designator is "30" a maximum allowed FAR is 0.75. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Under "PROJECT DATA, FLOOR AREA RATIO" it appears that the total gross floor area is 132,177 sq. ft. and than under "TOTAL BUILDING AREA(S)" the "GRAND TOTAL" lists 127,969 sq. ft. Clarify what the total gross floor area is for the FAR. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. The expansion calculation is cumulatively for the entire site. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. That said provide the zoning for the parcels to the east and on the west side of Kolb Road. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Provide a dimension for the vehicle parking space depth and width for the parking spaces shown along the west side of the drive-thru. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a As the proposed food service is part of the entire site the vehicle parking calculation is for the entire site. That said if you are going to use the shopping center calculation of 1 space per 300 sq. ft. of gross floor area for the proposed food service than the entire site calculation should be done using the 1 to 300 ratio. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a If the "COVERED PATIO" shown under the "CODE ANALYSIS & SUMMARY" is to be used for outdoor seating it needs to be included in the vehicle parking calculation. 13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d If the 1 to 300 ratio is going to be used for the vehicle parking than the new LUC Section 3.3.8.2.B Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces requirements apply to the entire site. 14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Demonstrate on the Short-Term bicycle detail how the requirement of LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.6 Each required short-term bicycle parking space must be at least two (2) feet by six (6) feet are met. The minimum space between bicycle racks is 4'-0" clear. 15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Demonstrate on the Short-Term bicycle detail how the requirement of LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.7 are met from the end of the rack east to the building. 16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O the "FRONT YARD, PERMITTED" setback of 40' shown on sheet T1.1 is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.6.2.5.B, ADT of 1,000 or greater the minimum street perimeter yard setback is 21' or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, measured from the back of future curb. Based on the elevations provided the minimum street perimeter yard setback is 24' If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0024 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, last approved site plan. |
| 03/16/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/19/2012 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/20/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 28, 2012 SUBJECT: Freddy's Restaurant Development Plan Package- Engineering Review TO: ADG Inc.; Attn: David Garcia, RA LOCATION: 7120 E Broadway Blvd, T14S R15E 17 Ward 2 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP12-0024 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement (JAS Engineering, 28FEB12). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Site Plan and Grading Plan. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: It is recommended that Development Standard 2-01 "Development Package" be reviewed prior to resubmittal. DS Sec.2-02 and 2-05 no longer exists and all reviews fall under DS Sec.2-01 for Development Package. The standard has changes that must be incorporated into the plan sheets for review and approval. 1) DS Sec.2-01.2.4: Revise the development plan document to include the Title Block in the lower right hand corner of each sheet. 2) DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan document to include the CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp 3) DS Sec.2-01.2.6: Revise the development plan document to include the Location Map in the upper right hand corner of the cover sheet. 4) DS Sec.2-01.3.2.B: Revise the title block on the development plan document to include a brief legal description of the site. 5) DS Sec.2-01.3.2.E: Revise the title block on the development plan document to include the page number and number of pages that are included within the set. 6) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The relevant Development Plan Package number (DP12-0024) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 7) DS Sec.2-01.3.5: Revise the sheet index on the first sheet to correctly list the names of each sheet in proper order on the development plan package. Specifically the site plan sheet AS1.1 needs to be before the civil sheets GP1 and 2. 8) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.6.b: Provide a General Note on the Development Plan Package that references all special overlay zones that are applicable to this site, specifically state that "the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria for Sec.2.8.3 Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone & Sec.2.8.4, Gateway Corridor Zone." 9) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the development plan document to correctly dimension the near and far side sight visibility triangles (SVTs) for the PAAL per DS Sec.3-01.5.3. Per the table the near side dimension should be 20'x345' and the far side dimension should be 20'x125'. However per DS Sec.3-01.5.1.B.1 the far side SVT can be dimensioned as 20'x30' since the MSR road has a median island with no opening for approaching traffic. 10) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to verify that vertical or extruded curbing is proposed along the south side of the proposed drive thru access aisle. For clarity label Keynote #9 in plan view to show that curbing is constructed to separate the drive thru from other vehicular use areas. 11) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise the development plan document to include the Keynote Label #11 in plan view for the proposed handicap access ramp adjacent to the new handicap parking spaces and the sidewalk that connects to the public right-of-way. 12) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 13) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document and provide a detail for the refuse enclosure to provide all aspect for construction purposes. The detail must match DS Sec.6-01 and Figure 3a for the required enclosure walls with gates, minimum compressive strength for the concrete, required bollard locations, dimensions for 10'x10' clear area for both solid waste and recyclable containers, etc. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 04/03/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/05/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/11/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |