Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP12-0023
Parcel: 11808002P

Address:
601 W 22ND ST

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP12-0023
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/29/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied Reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed in locations accessible to Tucson Water. Contact Mark Titus at Tucson Water (520-837-2248) for information regarding the installation of reduced pressure backflow prevention assemblies. Reference: Chapter 27, Article V, Section 27-76 (a), Tucson Code, http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/sites/default/files/water/docs/backflow-ordinance.pdf
05/30/2012 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: June 1, 2012
SUBJECT: Restaurant Depot Development Plan Package- 2nd Engineering Review
TO: Brad Krem
LOCATION: 601 W 22nd St T14S R13E S23 Ward 1
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP12-0023


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Site Plan, Grading Plan and Storm Water Pollution Prevent Plan review. The following items need to be addressed:


DRAINAGE REPORT:

1) Completed.

2) Completed.

3) Completed. See comment 32 below for Table clarification on Sheet 5.

4) Completed.

5) Completed.


SITE PLAN: Remove all clouds from the development plan document. The final copies of the development package should be clean and without any revision clouds. At this point the revision clouds are not needed as this plan has not been approved and the site has not been developed.

6) Completed.

7) Completed.

8) Completed.

9) Completed.

10) Completed.

11) Completed.

12) Completed.

13) Completed.

14) Completed.

15) Completed.

16) Completed.

17) Completed.

18) Completed.

19) Acknowledged. All proposed easements are required to have dedication and/or abandonment recordation prior to building certificate of occupancy.

20) Completed.

21) Completed.

22) Completed.

23) Restated: Acknowledged that the 100-year floodplain limits are now delineated however the 2nd half of the comment was not addressed. Per DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.4.C.4 provide the 100-year peak discharge value in plan view. Also Sheet 5 in plan view references General Note #6 for the FP Note, however the correct Note should be labeled as #5.

24) Completed.

25) Completed.

26) Completed.

27) Completed.

28) Completed.

29) Completed.

30) Completed.

31) Acknowledged. All proposed easements are required to have dedication and/or abandonment recordation prior to building certificate of occupancy.

32) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.1: Revise or clarify the information located in the Retention Basin table located on Sheet 5. The numbers shown on Sheet 5 (though larger in volume) do not match the Drainage Report for Top Area and Retention Provided. Also Basin A differs in Top and Bottom Elevation, clarify.

33) Complete.

34) Completed.

35) Completed.

36) Completed.

37) Completed.

38) Completed.

39) Acknowledged.


GEOTECHNICAL REPORT:

40) Provide a note on the development plan document as per the Geotechnical Report addendum dated 02MAY12. Per the report a note needs to be added to the project earthwork specifications for the soils located adjacent to the building and the southern retention basin to ensure proper removal and placement of structural fill.


SWPPP:

41) Completed.

42) Completed.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comment provided above. For expedite purposes the development plan package can be reviewed over the counter (PDSD Engineering Division comment only) for stamp approval once all items have been addressed. Please call to schedule an appointment when ready.

For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.


Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department
05/31/2012 DAVID RIVERA ZONING REVIEW Approv-Cond DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: David Rivera for Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: DP12-0023
601 W. 22nd St.
Development Package

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 05/29/2012 - Conditional Approval

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Remove all clouds from plans. The final copies of the development package should be clean and without any revision clouds. At this point the revision clouds are not needed as this plan has not been approved and the site has not been developed.

C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\DP12-0023a.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and if applicable any additional requested documents
06/01/2012 RONALD BROWN HC SITE REVIEW Approved
06/04/2012 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved
06/04/2012 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) The proposed greenway easement may displace the required street landscape border (along Osbourne Av.) only if it is accepted by the City and recorded. If the easement is not recorded a street landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4 is required to be shown on the plans and implemented.

Please forward the legal description and a depiction for the proposed easement and a copy of the title report to:

Jim Stoyanoff
Real Estate Division City of Tucson
201 N. Stone Ave. 6th Fl.
Tucson, AZ 85701

Include the recording date and sequence on the site plan after the easement document is prepared, executed, and recorded.

2) Revise the plans to provide a street landscape border along the Frontage Rd. LUC 3.7.2.4. The landscape border is required to be a minimum of ten feet wide, provide dimensions.

3) If existing I-10 landscaping is proposed to meet a portion of the street landscape border requirement, the following is required:

A) Approval in writing from ADOT to use a portion of the existing landscaping to meet the City requirement.

B) A minimim of of five of the required ten feet width must be located on the site (LUC 3.7.2.4.A.3) and any screening must be located such that it occupies space in the street landscape border no wider than the width of the wall or fence (LUC 3.7.3.2.C).

4) The site is required to include screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise the plans as necessary and label the screening elements on the landscape plans. DS 2-06.3.7.
Screening is required for all street frontages.

5) The required screening along the Frontage Rd. is required to be located at the back or behind the street landscape border. LUC 3.7.3.2.B

6) Revise Rainwater Harvesting plan per DS 10-03. The most critical missing elements are:
A) Site water budget- DS 10-03.4.1
B) Implementation plan DS 1-03.4.2 including required data and mapping.
C) Irrigation standards: 1) All systems shall include automatic rain shut-off devices.
2) Irrigation systems shall be fitted with irrigation controllers and shall be capable of monitoring and responding to plant water needs through the use of soil moisture gauges, tensiometers, weather stations and/or evapotranspiration data. (smart controllers)