Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - DP12-0023
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/06/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: March 19, 2012 SUBJECT: Restaurant Depot Development Plan Package TO: Brad Krem LOCATION: 601 W 22nd St T14S R13E S23 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP12-0023 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Site Plan, Grading Plan and Storm Water Pollution Prevent Plan review. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE REPORT: 1) Provide a discussion within the Drainage Statement to include conformance with the new Commercial Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance (DS Sec.10-03) and the proposed design of the project to meet all requirements within the Ordinance and Detention/Retention Manual. 2) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.4.C.5: Revise the Drainage Report to calculate and delineate the limits of the erosion hazard setback from the mapped regulatory wash on both the pre and post development exhibits. Refer to DS Sec.10-02.7 for erosion hazard setback calculations and requirements. 3) DS 10-01.3.5.5 and 10-02.14.5: Dry wells are highly discouraged due to substantial drywell failure within the City of Tucson. Revise the drainage report to include discussion on all requirements within DS 10-01.3.5.5 and 10-02.14.5 (1-10) for all systems which utilize a method of subsurface disposal, i.e. dry wells. The drainage statement must meet or exceed the minimum criteria within both Development Standards. 4) DS Sec.10-02.14.2.6: The results of the required 30-foot-deep boring should be examined to determine possible causes of slow infiltration or engineering measures needed to ensure infiltration. Threshold retention requirements may be waived in certain cases when stormwater retention is not feasible due to constraints imposed by subsurface conditions. In such cases detention criteria may be imposed in lieu of threshold retention requirements. 5) Floodplain Ordinance Tucson Code Section 26-10(c) states: The design of a detention or retention system, as reviewed and approved by the city engineer, shall include consideration of the degree of existing development within the basin and the capacity of the downstream drainage facilities. The systems will be designed with strict conformance to the public's health, safety and welfare. The effects of recharging storm runoff and possible pollution of the groundwater shall be evaluated for all systems employing infiltration systems, such as dry wells, in order to prevent contamination of the groundwater aquifer. The more technical requirements are listed in the City's drainage manual DS Sec.10-02.14.5. For review of a project we would need to see a drainage report discussing and showing that the proposed dry well conforms to items 1-10 of this section. SITE PLAN: It is recommended that Development Standard 2-01 "Development Package" be reviewed prior to resubmittal. All reviews fall under DS Sec.2-01 for Development Package. The standard has changes that must be incorporated into the plan sheets for review and approval. 6) DS Sec.2-01.2.4: Revise the plan sheets to include the title block in the lower right quadrant of each sheet 7) DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan document to include the CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of all sheets as shown on Sheets 1-4, 9 and 10. 8) DS Sec.2-01.2.9: Revise the Legend on Sheet 1 to include a symbol with description for the water surface elevations as shown within the plan set. Also include a symbol with description for the required 100-year floodplain limits that must be shown in plan view. 9) DS Sec.2-01.3.2.B: Provide in the required Title Block a brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat. 10) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The relevant Development Plan Package number (DP12-0023) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. 11) DS Sec.2-01.3.4: The project-location map shall cover approximately one (1) square mile, and if possible be oriented with the North arrow to the top of the page, and provide the following information. A. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area. B. Identify major streets within the square mile area, specifically I-10. C. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 12) DS Sec.2-01.3.5: Revise the plan set to include the SWPPP Exhibit within the sheet index on the first sheet of the development plan document and within the development plan package. 13) DS Sec.2-01.3.7: Provide the following note on the development plan document; "Call for a Pre-construction meeting prior to start of earthwork. To schedule a PDSD Pre-construction meeting, SWPPP inspection or general Engineering Inspections, call IVR (740-6970), or schedule with a Customer Service Representative at the Planning Development Services Department, or contact PDSD Engineering at 791-5550 extension 2101, or schedule inspections online at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/Online_Services/Online_Permits/online_permits.html" 14) DS Sec.2-01.3.7: Provide the following note on the development plan document to including a grading/drainage note specifying "conformance with City of Tucson Development Standard 11-01.0 (excavation and grading requirements)." 15) DS Sec.2-01.3.7: Provide the following note on the development plan document stating; "All retaining walls, proposed fencing and other walls will require a separate permit for review and approval by all necessary Planning Development Services Departments." 16) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.A.6.b: Provide a General Note on the Development Plan Package that references all special overlay zones that are applicable to this site, specifically state that "the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria for Sec.2.8.3 Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone." 17) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.F: Provide a note on the development plan document for the proposed Greenway Easement if this easement is to act as a trial system. Provide a note, as appropriate, indicating that a trail or path will be constructed for public or private use, the general location of the trail or path, and whom it will be constructed and maintained by. If it is intended to connect to an offsite feature, such as an exiting trail, wash, sidewalk, road, commercial or residential development, etc., so indicate. If the trail or path is to be dedicated, indicate the method of dedication. 18) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.A: Revise the development plan document to reference either in a note or in plan view the basis of bearing, together with distances in feet, to hundredths of a foot, or other functional reference system. 19) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.B: Verify that all easements are drawn with recordation information, location, width, and purpose of on the development plan document. A Title Report was not submitted for this project, but is required to verify if additional easements affect this property. Clarify all easements shown as to be released under the proposed building location, drainage easement, Greenway easement, ingress/egress easement, water easement, electrical easement, and abandoned gas easement, etc. 20) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Revise the development plan document to label 22nd Street as a "Public and Arterial MS&R." 21) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.E: Revise the development plan document to indicate the ground elevation on the site based on City of Tucson Datum (indicate City of Tucson field book number and page). 22) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.F: Revise the plan set to label all existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site, specifically within the ADOT right-of-way. Provide the Improvement Plan reference Number in plan view. 23) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.I: Revise the development plan document to label the 100-year floodplain limits for the regulatory wash as shown with the WSEL cross sections. The limits must be clearly delineated on the plan set. Per DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.4.C.4 provide the 100-year peak discharge value in plan view. 24) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.I: Revise the development plan document to include the seal and signature of the civil engineer under the Engineering's Certification Section on Sheet 1. 25) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: Provide approval from ADOT for all proposed work within the I-10 Frontage Road as proposed on the development plan document. 26) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: Revise the development plan documents to label the required 25-foot radii for the concrete curb returns for the proposed driveway location at 22nd Street per City of Tucson Transportation Access Management Guidelines (TAMG), Section 5.5. Refer to DS Sec.3-01.3.2.C for street development standards. 27) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the development plan documents, specifically the site plan to show both the existing and/or future sight visibility triangles for the PAAL access at 22nd Street. The near side dimension for an Arterial Street needs to be 20'x345' and the far side dimension should be 20'x185' 28) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the development plan documents, specifically the site plan to revise the near side sight visibility triangle for the PAAL access at the I-10 frontage road to reflect an Arterial Street with a larger SVT dimension (20'x345') to reflect the high traffic volume and rate of speed that the frontage road generates. 29) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to clearly label and dimension all areas of the proposed vehicular use area per DS Sec.3-05, specifically the PAAL access directly to the south of the existing Circle K building that falls within the subject parcel boundaries. 30) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.J: Revise the development plan document to label all dimensions for the MS&R Route, 22nd Street. Since the project site is adjacent to a Major Street & Route clearly label and dimension the MS&R right-of-way, future sidewalk, curb, and sight visibility triangles. 31) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.L: Revise the development plan document to provide the recordation information for all new easements in plan view and indicate whether the will be public or private. 32) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.1: Revise or clarify the Top Elevation and Bottom Elevation for Retention Basin C as shown in the Retention Basin table located on Sheet 5. Provide either in plan view or in a table the top and bottom widths for all basins to ensure they are designed to accommodate the required volumes. 33) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.1: Revise the development plan documents to label and dimension the required basin access ramps. Verify that the ramps meet the minimum width and slope requirement of 15-feet and 15%, respectively. Alternate means of access will be reviewed by the City Engineer on a case-by-case basis and must be specifically described in the Drainage Report and as a Note in the General Note Section of the development plan documents. 34) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.2: Provide additional labels in plan view for Keynote #10 and the required curb cut openings into the landscape areas for stormwater runoff. Currently only one Keynote label was located in plan view for one landscape area, revise. 35) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.O: Revise the development plan document to delineate the erosion hazard setback from the regulatory wash per DS Sec.10-02.7.6. 36) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise the development plan document to provide a raised sidewalk or separation for the proposed pedestrian access path located between the parking spots located directly north of the building. 37) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise the development plan document to verify the minimum 4-foot clear sidewalk widths along the front of the proposed building adjacent to the cart corral and long term parking spaces per DS Sec.2-08.5.1.A. 38) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for all handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 39) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document and provide a detail for the refuse enclosure to provide all aspect for construction purposes. The detail must match DS Sec.6-01 and Figure 3a for the required enclosure walls with gates, minimum compressive strength for the concrete, required bollard locations, dimensions for 10'x10' clear area for both solid waste and recyclable containers, etc. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 40) DS Sec.10-01.3.5.1.3.a and 10-02.14.2.6: Provide a Geotechnical Report evaluation that addresses the following: a) Soils report should provide conformance with DS Section 10-02.14.2.6 regarding 30-foot boring for the retention basins, and provide a discussion of the potential for hydro-collapsible soils and building setbacks from the required basins. b) Provide percolation rates for the retention basin for 5-year threshold to show that the drain down time meets the maximum per DS Sec.10-01.3.5.1. c) Provide pavement structure design recommendations. d) Provide slope stability recommendations for the constructed slopes that are proposed. e) Provide a General Note to include the reference to the Geotechnical Report and any addendums prepared for this project. Provide the date, job number, engineer who prepared the report, etc. SWPPP: 41) Provide a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that meets the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP) due to the proposed gradable area as shown on the development plan document. 42) Per City of Tucson Code Ordinance 10209, Chapter 26 Section 26-42.2: "For land disturbing activities that fall under the jurisdiction of this Article, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan must be prepared and certified by an engineer, or a landscape architect and submitted along with the application for a grading permit to the City of Tucson Development Services Department." The SWPPP report and exhibits must be signed and sealed by the engineer of record or by a Registered Landscape Architect. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package, Drainage Report, Geotechnical Report and SWPPP that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 03/08/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/26/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location of the backflow preventer for the building water service b. the location of the gas meter (if one is planned) c. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 03/27/2012 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 03/27/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET 3 1. At the series of (3) marked crossings connecting to the 22nd Street right of way, please provide detectable warning strips at both end of each marked crossings as per ICC A117.1, sections 406.12, 13 and 14. a. Reference ICC A117.1, Section 707.5 for specifications 2. Please provide a large scale detail reference to sheet 11 for the accessible parking layout. 3. Zoning may require pedestrian access to both the I-10 Frontage and the Osborne Av right of ways. Please reference Zoning comments. a. If required, all connections are to be accessible. SHEET 5 4. Please show all marked crossings and their required detectable warning strips. Reference comment 1 above. 5. For all accessible route slopes, comply with ICC A117.1, Section 403.3; 5% running and 2% cross slopes. 6. Ditto comment 3. SHEET 10 7. At detail 2, show the actual grade elevation difference of landing to finished grade. a. Provide actual riser height requirement for the landing elevation differential. SHEET 11 8. Please provide numbers for all details for reference purposes. 9. At the Parking lot Striping detail: a. Show maximum surface slopes as per ICC A117.1, Section 502.5 b. Show signage location c. Identify the "Van Accessible" parking spaces. 10. At the Sidewalk Ramp Access detail, please change notes 2 and 34 to reference the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC A117.1, 2003 Edition. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/28/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Identify and locate all easements on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.E 2) The proposed greenway easement may displace the required street landscape border (along Osbourne Av.) only if it is accepted by the City and recorded. Include the recording date and sequence on the site plan. If the easement is not recorded a street landscape border per LUC 3.7.2.4 is required to be shown on the plans and implemented. 3) Label the proposed easement as the El Paso and Southwestern Greenway. 4) Any required storm water detention/retention basins shall be landscaped to enhance the natural configuration of the basin. Design criteria are set forth in Development Standard 10-01.0. Provide landscaping for Basin A in conformance with the standards. LUC 3.7.4.3.A. Show the basin locations on the landscape plans. 5) Submit a native plant preservation plan. LUC 3.8.4.2 6) Revise the plans to provide a street landscape border along the Frontage Rd. LUC 3.7.2.4 7) The site is required to include screening per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Revise the plans as necessary and label and the screening elements on the landscape plans. DS 2-06.3.7. Screening is required for all street frontages. 8) Check DS 2-07. for the required landscape plan content. Add the required calculations. 9) Submit a Rainwater Harvesting plan per DS 10-03. 10) Clarify compliance with LUC 3.7.2.7., which states "All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved shall be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with an inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution. Revise landscape plan to identify the type and locations proposed for inert ground cover materials or seeded areas. It was not clear if symbol was intended for the 5/8 screened DG mulch. |
| 03/30/2012 | KEN BROUILLETTE | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/02/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: DP12-0023 601 W. 22nd St. Development Package TRANSMITTAL DATE: 03/29/2012 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-01.2.4 Provide the title block in the lower right corner of all sheets. 2. DS 2-01.3.1 Provide the name, phone number, mailing and email address of the developer of the project. If the owner is the developer please state so on the plan. 3. DS 2-01.3.2 The title block shall include the following information. A. The proposed name of the project. B. A brief legal description. D. The administrative street address. E. Page number and number of pages. 4. DS 2-01.3.3 This project has been assigned case number DP12-0023. Provide this case number in the lower right corner of all sheets. 5. DS 2-01.3.4 The project-location map shall cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. A. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area. B. Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property. C. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 6. DS 2-01.3.7.A.6.b List as a general note that this project ahs been designed to meet the criteria of Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Overlay Zone. 7. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide the allowed and provided Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculations. See LUC Sec. 3.2.11.2.C. Lot coverage percentage is not required, remove from plans. 8. DS 2-01.3.8.A This project has multiple lots (tax parcels). A tax parcel lot combination will be required to be completed. Provide documentation that the combination has been completed and approved by the Pima county Assessor. 9. DS 2-01.3.8.B Provide recording information for all proposed and existing easements as well as recording information for any easements which are to be abandoned. This would also include the "greenway" easement along the east side of the property. 10. DS 2-01.3.9.F Provide on the site plan the zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project with zoning boundaries clearly defined. ( including across any adjacent right of way) Remove from the location map the zoning classifications. 11. DS 2-01.3.9.H.2 Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 12. DS 2-01.3.9.H.4 Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned. 13. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5 Clearly indicate the clearance of the indicated canopy above the surface of the PAAL. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.6.5.B The minimum height clearance along access lanes and PAALS is fifteen (15) feet. Clearly indicate the width of the PAAL adjacent to the Circle K property. 14. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Cross reference the standard and handicap parking spaces from the detail on sheet 11 to the site plan. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.6.8.C Wheel stop curbing must be two and one-half (2½) feet from the front of the parking space. Provide a dimension locating the wheel stops on the details. 15. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.c Per LUC Sec.3.4.5 a 12X35 loading zone is required for the existing billboard. The loading zone must located within close proximity to the billboard. Clearly indicate the location, dimensions of the loading zone, paving, curbs and maneuverability for the loading zone. Provide in the general notes the number of required and provided loading zones. See LUC Sec. 3.4.5. The requirement is for a GFA over 50,000 Sq. Ft. two 12 X 55 loading zones are required. Provide dimensioned locations of the required loading zones. 16. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The indicated short term bicycle racks indicated on detail 1 of 10 do not meet the requirements of LUC Sec. 3.3.9.2.B.3 (two point connection). See LUC Sec. 3.3.9.5 for examples of approved short term bicycle racks. Provide dimensions for the short term bicycle parking spaces. See LUC Sec. 3.3.9.2.B.6, & .7. also Sec. 3.3.9.5.B for layout. Clearly indicate the required min. 5' access aisle. The indicated long term bicycle parking detail on sheet 1 of 10 does not meet the requirements of LUC Sec. 3.3.9.4.B, .C and .E. Provide a detail of the long term bicycle locker, dimensioned lay out, lighting, and required 5' access aisle. 17. DS 2-01.3.9.J Since street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of -way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 18. DS 2-01.3.9.Q On the footprint of the building on the site plan clearly indicate the area use specifically for storage area (dimensioned and indicate square footage in correlation with the parking calculations). 19. DS 2-01.3.9.R Per DS 2-08.4.1.A At least one (1) sidewalk will be provided from each street on which the project has frontage. Provide a sidewalk connecting to Osborne Ave. The indicated 5' concrete sidewalk between the parking spaces under the canopy must be physically separated from the vehicle use area. Either show handicap ramps or provide curbing along each side of the sidewalk. See DS 2-08.4.1. The indicated cross walk south of Basin "A" cannot be located behind a vehicle parking space. See DS 2-08.4.1.F. 20. DS 2-01.3.9.W Indicate that the monument sign at the north entrance will be done by separate permit or provide dimensions from the back of future curb and showing the sign not being located within the existing or future sight visibility triangle. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\DP12-0023.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 04/05/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | See Landcape comments. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 05/17/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |