Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - DP12-0022
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 03/05/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | Proposed addition does not adversely effect engineering or the overall drainage design. Approved. |
| 03/05/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/14/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Protected Native Plants harmed, damage or removed during development shall be mitigated by replacement with a plant or plants of the same size, genus and species in conformance with Table 3.8.6-I. Submit a revised landscape plan or monitoring report indicating the location and mitigation of required trees that are affected by expansion of building area. 2. Ensure that all Zoning comments and concerns are addressed. 3. Additional comments may apply. |
| 03/15/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Protected Native Plants harmed, damage or removed during development shall be mitigated by replacement with a plant or plants of the same size, genus and species in conformance with Table 3.8.6-I. Submit a revised landscape plan or monitoring report indicating the location and mitigation of required trees that are affected by expansion of building area. |
| 03/15/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: 4620 E Camp Lowell Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0022 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 16, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. D.S. 2-01.3.2.D Zoning acknowledges that D.S. 2-01.3.2.D states that an administrative street address is to be provided in the title block. After discussion with Pima County Addressing the administrative street address is to be provided adjacent to the title block. That said provide an administrative address adjacent to the title block. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development package number, DP12-0022 adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c Provide a building square footage expansion calculation on the plan. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E There appears to have been numerous lot splits done on this site. Provide documentation that these splits have been processed through the City of Tucson Planning and Development Services. It these lot splits were not approved by Planning and Development services a plat maybe required. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F The zoning for the parcel located on the east side of Swan Road is not shown correctly. This zone should be listed as O-3. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F The zoning for the parcel located on the north side of Camp Lowell is not shown correctly. This zone should be listed as C-1 and C-2. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.b Per LUC Section 2.8.3.5.D.1 On development projects that are not part of a subdivision plat or rezoning application, the site area within the MS&R right-of-way may be used as follows. That said as you are electing to use the new vehicle parking calculations and the fact that is projects right-of-way (ROW) dedication was part of a rezoning the MS&R reduction may not be used. Remove this from the plan and provide a new vehicle parking calculation. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.b As you are electing to use the new vehicle parking calculations LUC Section 3.3.5.1 10% Reduction is no longer applicable. Remove this from the plan and provide a new vehicle parking calculation. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d As you are electing to use the new vehicle parking calculations the new bicycle parking calculations must be used. Provide a revised bicycle parking calculation based on LUC Section 3.3.8.2.B. 10. d As you are electing to use the new vehicle parking calculations the new bicycle parking calculations must be used. Remove all references to "Class I & Class II" bicycle parking from the plan as it is not applicable. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the square footage and the height of the addition and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0022 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, last approved site plan. |
| 03/21/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/23/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/23/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/03/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |