Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP12-0018
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/16/2012 | CAGUILA1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/21/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/22/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/27/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/01/2012 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP12-0018 320 E Medina Rd Development Package Review for a change of use from Wholesale Use to a Construction Service Use TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 6, 2012 DUE DATE: March 20, 2012 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. This project has been reviewed for full code compliance due to 100% expansion of the site. Per the previous plans submitted by the applicant it appears that the Phase II development was never completed but the east half of the site has been used without any type of approved plan and constitutes a greater than 100% expansion. Full code compliance is required for the overall site. The following comments have been made based on the full code compliance review. Code compliance includes but is not limited to Landscaping and screening, pedestrian access, accessible routes, bicycle parking, loading zones if applicable for this use. If a revised or new newer site plan is provided that provides the information related to the use of the east side of the property, please 2. DS 2-01.2.5 - Place the approval stamp in the 3 x 5 box of all plan sheets. The digital stamp may be downloaded from the following PDSD website, or use the following link http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp. 3. DS 2-01.3.7.A.b - This site is subject to compliance with the regulations of the Airport Environs Zone. The site is subject to compliance with the NCD 65-70 and Height restriction. List in general note 9 that compliance with NCD 65-70 and height restrictions have been met. Also list the LUC section number 2.8.5 for the AEZ overlay. The mean sea level of the run way that affects this location as well as the mean sea level of the site including the allowed height is to be listed on the plan. The delineation of the height and NCD layers must be drawn and labeled on the plan. Include the calculation for the height restriction that demonstrates compliance with the AEZ height restriction. 4. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.c and .d - As noted in and earlier comment the last approved site plan submitted as reference by the applicant indicates an approved plan for two phases. Phase on one was approved in 1993 but there is not indication of the use in the phase two portion of the site. The info on the previous approved site plan only states future phase two. Based on this information it is clear that the phase two development was not approved by any other document unless the applicant has additional information or approved drawings for the use of the phase two are zoning is considering an expansion of the use area and would require that compliance with zoning requirements such as pedestrian circulation, landscaping and screening, vehicle and bicycle parking, and loading zones if applicable are addressed per current code requirements. Additional requirements may apply by other reviewer disciplines and their respective regulations. Please indicate on the plans if storage is proposed on any portion of the site. If so, ensure that any applicable requirements such as additional vehicle parking are addressed for the use areas of the Construction Services Use. 5. DS 2-01.3.8 - Existing Site Conditions. The following information shall be provided on the plan/plat drawing to indicate the existing conditions on site and within fifty (50) feet of the site. On sites bounded by a street with a width of fifty (50) feet or greater, the existing conditions across the street will be provided. 6. DS 2-01.3.9.O - O. All applicable building setback lines, such as erosion hazard, floodplain detention/retention basins, and zoning, including sight visibility triangles, will be shown. Draw and label the building setback from the street property line and the west property line. 7. DS 2-01.3.9.S - Show on-site pedestrian circulation as required by the LUC utilizing location and the design criteria in Development Standard 2-08.0. It is not clear what type of material is proposed for the accessible/pedestrian route. DS 2-08.5.1.C - Composition, requires that a pedestrian sidewalk be constructed of Portland concrete or other smooth and durable surface. Asphalt concrete is not an allowed material for a pedestrian sidewalk. In addition the sidewalk must be provided to the street sidewalk and if no sidewalk is present on the street right of way the on-site sidewalk must be provided to the property line. The accessible route must include any truncated domes where deemed applicable by the ADA plans reviewer. 2-08.4.1 - Pedestrian sidewalks must be physically separated from all travel lanes by means of curbing, grade separation, barriers, and railing or other means if the a sidewalk is to be placed adjacent to a travel lane. 8. DS 2-01.3.9.S - Where and if applicable show on-site pedestrian refuge areas per LUC section 3.3.0 (moved from DS 3-05). 9. DS 2-01.3.9.T - Show the location(s) of refuse areas. 10. DS 2-01.3.9.W - If applicable to this project, indicate the location of proposed or existing signs. Draw and label the location and size of the signage 11. DS 2-01.3.9.X - See the Landscape reviewer comments for landscape and screening requirements. 12. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the revision to plans and response to the zoning comments provided based on this first site plan (DP) submittal. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\DP12-0018.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package plans and requested documents if available. |
| 03/02/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Clarify when the parcels were paved and whether the paving of the eastern lot was ever reviewed or approved. If the paving was completed after September 1984, retention and detention must be addressed. The included plans only show development on the western parcel. It may be possible to account for required retention and detention within the proposed landscape areas. 2. Show locations of solid waste containers and enclosures with access in accordance with DS 6-01. 3. If the project is determined to require full code compliance, additional comments will be forthcoming. |
| 03/15/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/15/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide an accessible pedestrian way from the main entrance to the Medina Road right of way, pedestrian way. a. Provide all required marked crossings, detectable warning strips and curb ramps as necessary. 2. Please define what surface material is used for the accessible route on site and the entrance patio. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/21/2012 | GBONILL1 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Passed |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2012 | GERARDO BONILLA | REJECT SHELF | Completed |