Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP12-0017
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/09/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Please indicate existing fire hydrant location(s), with dimensions to buildings and/or property lines. Refer to City of Tucson amendments to the 2006 International Fire Code (section 508) for spacing and location requirements. Plans indicate existence of security gate(s). Refer to City of Tucson amendments to the 2006 International Fire Code (Sections 503.6.1 and 503.6.2) for requirements. Indicate methods of compliance on plans. |
| 02/09/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/17/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meters and backflow preventers b. the locations of the building connections to the public sewers Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 02/23/2012 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/24/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan and landscape plan with the next submittal. 2. Submittals must include elements indicated within Development Standard 2-01.0: See Zoning comments for details 3. Landscaping requirements apply to expansion of existing development as follows: 4. On sites where the gross floor area of the existing building(s) is more than ten thousand (10,000) square feet, expansion in square footage of land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area as follows: a. If the expansion is less than 25%, the requirements of this Division apply only to the proposed expansion. Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B b. If the expansion is 25% or greater or if expansions as of February 15, 1991 cumulatively result in a 25% or greater expansion in land area, floor area, lot coverage, or vehicular use area, the requirements of this Division apply to the entire site per LUC 3.7.1.2.B. 5. Provide the correct building area expansion calculation on the site plan D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c. 6. Landscaping required or not shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee LUC 3.7.2.4. Obtain permission for use of ROW. 7. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 8. Additional comments may apply. |
| 03/01/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: O'Rielly Chevrolet - New Used Car Sales Building & Remodel Development Package (1st Review) DP12-0017 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 6, 2012 DUE DATE: March 09, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is February 07, 2013 2. Provide a copy of the last approved site plan with your next submittal. The following comments are based on Development Package Submittal Requirements: 1. The drawing order is not correct. The detail sheet(s) should follow the grading plan, landscape plans should follow the details sheet(s). The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0: 1. D.S. 2-01.3.2.D Remove the address from the title block and place it adjacent to the title block in the lower right corner of the page. Zoning acknowledges that the current D.S. 2-01.0 asks for the address within the title block but due to requirements Pima County Addressing we are in the process of revising the development standard. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E The total number of pages is not correct and the total number of pages has not added to all sheets. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the development package number, DP12-0017 adjacent to the title block on all sheets. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. That said the existing and proposed use should be listed as "VEHICLE RENTAL AND SALES "31", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.9.5.A AND .B". 5. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Revise General Notes 17 to include "SEC. 2.8.4, GATEWAY CORRIDOR ZONE". 6. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.a There is a structure located in the southwest corner of the site that does not appear to be accounted for in the total square footage. Clarify what this structure is and if applicable include the square footage in the Floor Area Ratio (FAR). 7. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Under "PROJECT DATA, FLOOR AREA RATIO" it appears that the total gross floor area is 132,177 sq. ft. and than under "TOTAL BUILDING AREA(S)" the "GRAND TOTAL" lists 127,969 sq. ft. Clarify what the total gross floor area is for the FAR. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.c Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide a bicycle parking calculation on the plan. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the square footage and the height of each commercial, industrial, or business structure and the specific use proposed within the footprint of the building(s). That said provide the square footage for the proposed "USED CAR SALES BLDG" and the structure located near the southwest corner of the site on the plan. 11. Remove the CDRC stamp from the plan and provide the new "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE" approval stamp on all sheets. This stamp can be found in "jpg, dwg, pdf" format at http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0017 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, last approved site plan. |
| 03/06/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | March 9, 2012 DP12-0017 1. Revise the site plan and other plans to show the floodplain water surface elevations as shown on the civil engineers plans. 2. Show existing conditions on adjacent properties for at least 50 feet in all directions. 3. The floodplain use permit will be approved when the site plan is approved. |
| 03/09/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET DP-2 1. All accessible routes are to comply with ICC A 117.1, Section 403.3 or Section 405 for slopes greater than 5% slope. 2. The accessible route located in the one way auto service lane just west of the Customer Lounge/Cafe area may not share the vehicular areas. It must have its on identifiable area separated from the auto service lane as required by the building code and development standards. a. If the shown accessible route in the service road paving area meets the requirements of 403.3, why can't the concrete pedestrian way adjacent to the building meet the same slopes and be designated as the accessible route? 3. At the marked crossing in front of the Service Drop, the detectable warning strips may only be as wide as the marked crossing as per ICC A 17.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14. 4. Not used 5. Not Used 6. Delete the curb ramp and detectable warning strip located at the North-East corner of the building leading to no where but a hazardous vehicle access area. A 6" curb here is a good indication of a pending hazardous area. 7. If the new entrance is intended as a passenger loading zone, then please add an accessible passenger loading zone as per the 2006 IBC, Section 1106.7 and ICC A 117.1, Section 503. If it is not intened as a passenger loading zone, please provide a note to that effect note on the drawings. SHEET DP-3 8. At detail 8, please indicate a maximum slope of 2% for all directions of the accessible parking areas and aisle. END OF REVIEW |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 04/03/2012 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |