Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP12-0013
Parcel: 13215001C

Address:
705 E AJO WY

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - DP12-0013
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/23/2012 CARL SCHULTZ FIRE REVIEW Approved Will need Separate plan and permit for CNG Fuel inland
Need Fire dept. key system for entrance gates
01/23/2012 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
01/25/2012 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied SHEET C1
1. General Note 15 indicates 4 of 5 accessible parking spaces are "Van Accessible". As per detail 6/X1.3, none of the accessible parking spaces meet the dimensional width requirements as set forth by ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 502.2 for a "Van Accessible" parking space. Reference comment 5 below.
SHEET C2
2. At note 20, change the code reference from PC/COT to ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 406.13 and 705.5
SHEET X1.1
3. Correct the detail reference 6/X1.6 to 6/X1.3. There is no sheet X1.6
4. Insure the existing ramp (Note 2.4) meets all the accessible requirements of ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 406.
SHEET C2, X1.1 AND DETAIL 6/X1.3
5. Need to have one of the accessible parking spaces to be "Van Accessible" with spacing as required by ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 502.2. (11'-0" wide space, 5'-0" aisle or 8'-0" wide space , 8'-0" aisle).
SHEET X/1.3, DETAILS 5 AND 6
6. Change the detail reference numbers from X1.6 TO X1.3.
END OF REVIEW
01/26/2012 PAUL MACHADO ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied To: Cypress Civil Development DATE: February 3, 2012
Kevin Hall, P.E.
2101 N. Country Club Rd., #9 Tucson, Arizona 85716

Subject: Golden Eagle Distributors, 705 E. Ajo Way
Site plan DP12-0013 (First Review)
T14S, R14E, Section 30

RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan and Drainage Statement, SWPPP

The Site Plan (SP), Drainage Statement (DS) and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal.

Site Plan:

1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP.
2. Provide documentation indicating that the off-site work is permissible from Southern Pacific Railroad at the south property line. I understand that the site is existing, however in order to permit the proposed improvements on a different owners property, permission from them must be granted first. For example: an easement or a cross-access
3. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. The through street side line and of the SVT is located at the face of curb, not the gutter line. For a future M, S and R with a R/W width of 150', the curb location is 12' from the property/right-of-way line.
4. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. Dimension all widths where applicable.
5. Please label all vehicular, bicycle, pedestrian, and handicapped circulation clearly identified per D.S. 2-02.2.1.12. The existing handicap ramp at SW corner of the building has been eliminated by the CNG structure. Explain how the building will be accessed if eliminated.
6. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. Show how the service vehicle will exits the property after refilling the CNG tanks. Also per a recent site visit, large trucks were seen using the main entrance and if they continue to do so, the turning radii at the end of the entrance may not sufficient.
7. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. It appears that drainage the dock area will be blocked by the sidewalk that connects the new guard shack to the existing building at the west parking lot expansion. Also explain the vertical difference between the sidewalk and the dock.
8. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17.
9. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. Show the future R/W line in the area of the west parking lot expansion. The west area of the parking expansion is not shown at the future R/W width of 150'.
10. All easement of record must be graphically shown on the plan together with recording docket and page per D.S. 2-02.2.1.20. Call out the user agreement between Golden Eagle and SPRR on the plan view and show it limits.
11. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21.
12. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23.
13. Show all fences, walls, or vegetation for screening and sight visibility by type, material, height, location and spacing per D.S. 2-02.2.1.27.
14. Show Development/Site plan number (DP12-0013) s per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29.
15. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. Is there an existing refuse enclosure? If so, show it on the plans.
16. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information.
17. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable.
18. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers and/or sidewalk scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof drain/sidewalk scupper locations have been designed and located and that the 10-year flow must be conveyed under any other sidewalks and/or pedestrian paths will suffice. This comment pertains to the sidewalk crossing the docking area from the new west guard shack to the dock.
19. List the consulting engineer and the owner/developer on the plans with the pertinent information.
20. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting".
21. A grading permit may be required depending on the responses to site plan.

Drainage Statement:
1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DS.
2. Include the solution to comment no. 7 on the SP in the DS.

Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP):
NOTE: The following comments are from the ADEQ checklist and are used to review the SWPPP.
OPERATOR RESPONSIBILITIES:
1. Remove the "not of construction" seal on the plans.
2. Identify who is responsible for on-site SWPPP implementation. Part III.A.2.d.
3.
4. Indicate or show the areas of the project where the operator has control over project specifications, including the ability to make changes in the specifications. Part III.B.2.a.
5. Provide name(s) of the person(s) who have day-to-day control over construction plans and specifications. Part III.B.2.a.
6. Identity who is responsible for installing, implementing, and maintaining the BMP's in the plan. Part III.B.2.b.
7. Identify or show the areas of the project where each operator has control over day-to-day activities. Part III.B.2.b.
8. Provide name(s) of the person(s) having control over project specifications, including the ability to make changes in the specifications. Part III.B.2.b.
9. Provide the name and contact information for all operators and indicate the areas of the project each operator controls. Part III.C.1.
SITE MAP:
10. Use arrows to show the direction(s) where stormwater will flow for all areas within the project limits (This is for the period during construction, not final contours. Flow direction may change as project grading progresses; when this occurs, maps are to be updated.). Part III.C.3.a. Per SP comment no. 7, an arrow goes over the raised sidewalk.
11. Show areas of soil disturbance and areas that will not be disturbed. Part III.C.3.b.
12. Show locations where stabilization BMP's are expected to occur. Part III.C.3.d. It appears the BMP's do not adequately capture the stormwater at the NE portion of the project.
13. Show locations where stormwater discharges to surface water (including wetlands, ephemeral water and dry washes) and to municipal storm sewer systems (MS4's) (use an "X" to indicate discharge location(s)). Where surface waters and/or MS4's receiving stormwater do not fit on the map, use arrows to show the direction and indicate the approximate distance to the surface water and/or MS4's. Part III.C.3.g.
BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPs):
14. If culverts are present on-site, describe measures that will be used to minimize erosion at and around the culvert(s). Part IV.B.1.c. Per a recent site visit, a storm drain was noted to be located NE of the main entrance and because of the majority of the site directly drains into the Julian wash from that location, BMP's shall be place around that grate.
15. Identify how records of when construction activities temporarily or permanently on all portions of the site will be kept. Part IV.B.3.b.
16. Provide reason(s) or rationale why a sediment basin was determined to not be possible at the project site (If applicable). Part IV.C.3.
POST-CONSTRUCTION CONTROLS:
17. Identify post-construction stormwater BMP's (e.g., porous pavement, open space preservation, etc.) that will be installed as part of this project. NOTE: Temporary BMP's (e.g., straw waddles, etc.) must be removed prior to submitting your Notice of Termination (NOT). Part IV.F.1.
INSPECTIONS:
18. Identify the minimum inspection frequency as well as goals for more frequent inspections. Part IV.H.1.
19. Provide name, title and qualifications of person(s) who will be conducting inspections. Part IV.H.1.
20. Describe how inspection of the following items will be conducted (Part IV.H.3.a.):
" Construction site entrance and egress locations(s) including looking for evidence of sediment, debris, and other pollutants tacked offsite onto paved surfaces (e.g., streets, sidewalks, parking lots, etc.).
" Municipal storm sewer systems, including streets, inlets, etc. which can be observed at ground level. Should focus on discharge (and potential for discharge) and accumulation of sediment, trash, and other pollutants.
" For discharge points that are inaccessible, inspection of downstream locations should occur, where practicable.
21. Describe procedures for repairing, replacing, and/or supplementing nonfunctional and underperforming BMP's (see Permit Part IV.I.2). Part IV.H.3.c.
ADMINISTRATIVE:
22. Ensure the SWPPP is signed by a person meeting the certification requirements of Permit Part VIII.J. Part III.A.3, Part VIII.J.2.
23. Include a copy of the completed NOI form that was submitted to ADEQ. Part III.D.2.
24. Include a copy of the authorization certificate received from ADEQ. Part III.D.3.
25. Identify any city or county which received a copy of the authorization certificate. Part III.D.4.
26. Include copies of the other agreements with any state, local or federal agencies that would affect the provisions of implementation of the SWPPP, if applicable (404 permits, local grading permits, etc.). Part III.C.5. A grading plan may be required for this project, see SP comment no. 21.
27. Describe post-construction storm water management measures that will be installed during the construction process to control pollutants in stormwater discharges after construction operations have been completed. Structural measures shall be placed on upland soils to the degree attainable. Such measures must be designed and installed consistent with applicable local or state stormwater management requirements. (Part IV.D.6).
Inspections

28. Add a note stating that the operator(s) shall report to ADEQ any noncompliance (including spills) which may endanger human health or the environment. The operator shall orally notify the office listed below within 24 hours:

Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
1110 W. Washington, 5th floor (5515B-1)
Phoenix, AZ 85007
Office: 602-771-4466; Fax 602-771-4505

Signature Requirements
29. Include a certification and signature for each operator in accordance with Part VII.K. (Part IV.J.1).
30. All NOIs must be signed and certified as follows:
a) For a corporation: By a responsible corporate officer. For the purpose of this Part, a responsible corporate officer means:
i) A president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy or decision-making functions for the corporation; or
ii) The manager of one or more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities, provided, the manager is authorized to make management decisions which govern the operation of the regulated facility including having the explicit or implicit duty of making major capital investment recommendations, and initiating and directing other comprehensive measures to assure long term environmental compliance with environmental laws and regulations; the manager can ensure that the necessary systems are established or actions taken to gather complete and accurate information for permit application requirements; and where authority to sign documents has been assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures.
b) For a partnership or sole proprietorship: By a general partner or the proprietor, respectively; or
c) For a municipality, state, federal, or other public agency: By either a principal executive officer or ranking elected official. For purposes of this section, a principal executive officer of a Federal agency is the chief executive officer having responsibility for the overall operations of a principal geographic unit of the agency (e.g. Regional Administrators of EPA).
31. Reports and Other Information: All NOTs, SWPPPs, reports, certifications, or information required by this general permit and other information requested by the ADEQ or authorized representative of the ADEQ shall be signed by a person described in Part VI.K.1 or by a duly authorized representative of that person. A person is a duly authorized representative only if:
d) The authorization is made in writing by a person described in Part VII.K.1;
e) The authorization specifies either an individual or a position having responsibility for the overall operation of the regulated facility or activity, such as the position of manager, operator, superintendent, or position of equivalent responsibility or an individual or position having overall responsibility for environmental matters for the operator. (A "duly authorized representative" may be either a named individual or any individual occupying a named position.); and
f) The signed and dated written authorization is included in the SWPPP and submitted to the ADEQ upon request.
32. Certification. Any person signing a documents under the terms of this permit shall make the following certification: I certify under penalty of law, that this document and all attachments were prepared under my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gathered and evaluated the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering information, the information submitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information, including the possibility of fine and imprisonment for knowing violations.

If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov
Paul P. Machado
Senior Engineering Associate
City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department
201 N. Stone Avenue
P.O. Box 27210
Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210
(520) 837-4932 office
(520) 879-8010 fax
C:/705 E. Ajo Way Site DP
02/01/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied 1. Show that the location of the CNG dispensing facility is such that all portions of any vehicle being fueled will be located within the property lines. Reference: Section 2203.1, IFC 2006.
2. Show that the locations of the CNG compressor, dispensers, and storage vessels comply with the separation requirements of Section 2208, IFC 2006.
02/02/2012 TERRY STEVENS ZONING REVIEW Denied DSD TRANSMITTAL

FROM: Terry Stevens
Lead Planner

PROJECT: DP12-0013
705 E. Ajo Way
Development Package - Site Plan

TRANSMITTAL DATE: 02/01/2012

COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. There has been two site plans submitted. This review is based upon sheets g1.0, C1 thru C4. Remove the other site plan or supply all required zoning information on both plans.

2. DS 2-01.2.4 A title block shall be provided in the lower right corner of each sheet (site, details, landscape, nppo, grading)

3. DS 2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan document to include the correct CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp

4. DS 2-01.2.6 A small project location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet.

5. DS 2-01.3.2 3.2 The title block shall include the following information.
A. The proposed name of the project or subdivision, or if there is no name, the
proposed tenant's name.
B. A brief legal description.
D. The administrative street address.
E. Page number and number of pages. All sheets of this plan should be numbered in sequence including site, details, landscape, nppo, grading, etc.

6. DS 2-01.3.3 Provide the case number, DP12-0013, near the lower right corner of each sheet.

7. DS 2-01.3.4 The project-location map shall cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information.
A. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area.
B. Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all
streets that abut the subject property.
C. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be
labeled.

8. DS 2-01.3.7.A.1 In general note #2 revise the existing zoning to I-1 and R-2.

Provide documentation that the development in the R-2 portion of this site (railroad lease area) has been approved by the City of Tucson.

Provide the legal description and metes and bounds for the lease area.

9. DS 2-01.3.7.A.2 Include in the gross area of this site the railroad lease area.

10. DS 2-01.3.7.A.4 List as a general note the existing use as per LUC, as follows: Food and Beverage Wholesaling "34"

11. DS 2-01.3.7.A.6.b List as a general note that this project has been design to meet the overlay zone criteria for Sec. 2.8.3 Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Overly Zone.

Clearly indicate the location of the future curb along Ajo Way.

12. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.a Provide the floor area for each building. The listed gross floor area does not match the floor area indicated on sheet x1.0. A total of 158,526 gross floor area is indicated. Clarify.

13. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.c Provide lot area expansion calculations. The lot area has been expanded previously and those calculations must be included. The railroad lease area is to be included in the lot area expansion calculations as well.

Per LUC a greater than 25% expansion of lot area will required full code compliance for the entire site.

14. DS 2-01.3.8.B If applicable provide all easements on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated.

15. DS 2-01.3.9.H.2 Show future and existing sight visibility triangles.

16. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The vehicle parking calculations have not been completed as per LUC Sec. 3.3.4 for the Industrial Use group. Required is 1 space per 1000 square feet of gross floor area. Gross floor area is 158,526 thus requiring 159 vehicle parking spaces.

Provide the number of required and provided vehicle parking spaces for the entire site. Sheet x1.0 indicates 310 parking spaces provided. Clarify with general note number 15.

If the total number of vehicle parking spaces is 310 then 8 handicap parking spaces are required for the entire site. Clearly indicate the location of all handicap parking spaces.

Per sheet x1.0 north east of the maintenance building there appears that additional parking spaces are being added. (spaces 118-129) The pedestrian circulation path for the handicap parking space indicated which was not installed per the last approved plan and does not meet current code. The cross walk cannot pass behind a vehicle parking space. Indicate this area on this site with revisions.

17. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5 Clearly indicate the width of all PAALs, for example: at the one way PAALs at both of the guard houses, both entrances from Ajo Way, north of the east guard house, northwest corner of the new parking lot.

18. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.c The number of required loading zones per LUC Sec. 3.4.5 is two. Clearly indicate that the size of the required loading zones are a minimum of 12 X 55.

19. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The number of required bicycle parking spaces per LUC Sec. 3.3.8 in the Industrial Use group not the Commercial Storage Use group is 1 long term bicycle parking space per 15,000 sq. ft. of GFA. Maximum 10.

20. DS 2-01.3.9.O In general note 13 the required building setback for street frontage is 21' or the height of the wall of the structure from the back of future curb. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.5.B. MS&R are to use developing area setbacks with an ADT of greater than 1000. Rrevise note

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961

C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\DP12-0013.doc

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents
02/03/2012 JOE LINVILLE NPPO REVIEW Approved exception
02/03/2012 JOE LINVILLE LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans.
DS 2-07.2.1.B

2) Revise the landscape plan to provide the square footage of the oasis allowance area and calculation. DS 2-07.2.2.A.2.b

3) Landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. Provide verification, in writing, of any approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements.

4) Revise the landscape plan to show the landscaping associated with permit #T06CM06551. Trees were required for that parking expansion.

5) Revise the DP to include calculations per DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.

6) Revise the landscape plan to clarify and include landscape calculations for the entire Ajo Rd. frontage.
DS 2-07.2.2.A.2

7) The area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. Revise the plans to clarify compliance. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
02/21/2012 CINDY AGUILAR OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed