Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP12-0009
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/23/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/24/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/06/2012 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 03/06/2012, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Campus Acquisition/Tyndall Housing DP12-0009, T14S, R14E, SECTION 07 RECEIVED: Development Package on February 23, 2012 The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. This project is part of an Urban Overlay District (UOD) process for the West University Transition Area. The process has not been completed and the UOD has not been adopted by Mayor and Council. Since the UOD process has not been finalized yet, a complete and an effective review can not be conducted. Additional submittal(s) will be required to ensure that the project complies with the Finalized UOD document. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Development Package where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. Provide, on the drainage exhibits, all right of way width including the alley. 2. Is the site impacted by offsite runoff other what is shown on the drainage exhibit? 3. Provide, in the report, the proposed drainage scheme and all proposed drainage facilities and their design calculations (i.e. drainage scuppers, curb openings, storm drain rating, erosion control pads, swales, alley's hydraulic rating, proposed materials, dimensions, etc.). 4. Address, in the report, drainage facilities maintenance requirement and responsibility and specify that the inspection shall be performed by a registered civil engineer annually and/or after every major storm. Additionally, provide a drainage facilities maintenance checklist to facilitate the required maintenance. Please be advised that this requirement applies to all proposed drainage facilities; not only detention/retention basins. Cover Sheet: 1. Provide a reduced scale map of the UOD indicating the portion being developed (D.S. 2-01.3.6.). BASE LAYER SHEET COMMENTS: 1. Show the location, dimension and the recording information of the proposed water easement (D.S. 2-01.3.9.L). Permitting/General Notes: 1. Complete the overlay zone number in Permitting Note #6 (D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b). 2. Add the following general notes: a. Any revision to the Grading Plan MAY require a re-submittal of a revised grading plan for review. Contact PDSD Engineering at 791-5550 to discuss changes in grading design. 3. General Notes #29 and #42 are the same. Remove one of them. 4. General Note #36 and #42 are very similar. Remove one of them. Site Plan: 1. Provide the proposed building roof drainage arrows (D.S. 2-01.3.9.N.2). Grading Plan: 1. Show the proposed driveway widths. SWPPP: 1. Include a copy of the authorization certificate received from ADEQ (Part III.D.2). If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan Package and drainage report |
| 03/08/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Subject to confirmation of compliance with adopted Zoning Ordinance. |
| 03/08/2012 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 March 8, 2012 To: GRENIER ENGINEERING, INC. Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: TYNDALL AND PARK HOUSING CAMPUS ACQUISITIONS HOLDINGS Development Plan – 2nd submittal DP12-0009 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 03/08/2012 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/08/2012 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | The review response C-6b states to see Sheet A1.0 for added keynote 4. This keynote does not pertain to this issue. The Fire Department is asking for the fire control room size to increase to 200 square feet. The current 2006 IFC requires 96 square feet, but the 2009 and the soon to be adopted 2012 IFC requires the minimum 200 square feet room. This is being asked due to the fact of the alley way behind the building is too close to the structure for ladder operations. Therefore, additional apparatus will be using the front of the struture for firefighting operations and more personnel may be using the fire control room. The fire department thanks you in advance for this consideration during the planning stage. |
| 03/08/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Approved |
| 03/08/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/08/2012 | PGEHLEN1 | DESIGN EXAMINER | REVIEW | Denied | Adam, in regard to the CDRC review back-check I am *recommending approval*with the following advisory design suggestions to the applicant as part of this response: Although no contributing historic structures as illustrated on the MGD UOD figure 2 are impacted by this development (C-18), canopies (C-9.aa), signage (C-19.j), building material and color palettes (C-19e) should reflect compatibility with the historic traditions of the University of Arizona, City of Tucson, and adjacent historic neighborhoods (C-19.j). While compatible material indications where presented in the development plan, no color presentations were given. By providing color renderings of building facades, and related color graphics of the surrounding context, the applicant will further demonstrate their intention to respond to MGD UOD design standards. Finally, it is also recommended that subsequent indication in regard to lighting as a design feature be presented via graphic and photometric evidence. Particularly in regard to glare, safety, and local traditional ambiance (C-19a, j). *Please note that the above recommendation is subject to change based on the outcome of pending Design Review Committee (DRC) meeting scheduled on on the 14th of this month*. Sincerely, Rick Gonzalez COT MGD Design Professional |
| 03/09/2012 | JWILLIA4 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Date Case Number Project Address March 8, 2012 DP12-0009 TYNDALL AND PARK HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: The proposed Plan for the TYNDALL AND PARK HOUSING, Development Plan Case No. DP12-0009, is hereby Approved with the following condition. A Note must be added to the Site Plan Permitting Notes, Sheet 6 of 20, Stating the following: Note: On the days of Solid Waste and Recycle Service collection the facility maintenance personnel shall be responsible for positioning the Solid Waste and Recycle Containers to the edge of the public alley, for Service Vehicles to see the containers to be serviced. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 03/09/2012 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES March 9, 2012 Lisa Bowers Metro TED Tucson, Arizona Subject: DP12-0009 CAMPUS ACQUISITIONS Development Package Dear Lisa: The above referenced Development Package has been CONDITIONALLY APPROVED by the Community Design Review Committee. Once the necessary corrections are made, please submit the following documents for sign-off. 1 Rolled COMPLETE SET of the Development Package. Please include applicable sheets from any other concurrent reviews. 1 CD that contains all of the drainage/hydrology and other reports submitted for the review and approval of this plan (if applicable). Additional print copies will be made from the complete set and distributed to various review agencies for their files. These copies will be ordered from the City’s contracted print company and billed to you unless you already have an account at another printing company. Please let us know which printing company you would prefer to use and list them on your attached transmittal form when submitting your plans to the CDRC office for sign-off approval. Plans will not be signed and released until the CDRC office has been notified by PC Addressing that all fees for this plan have been paid. The CDRC office will need this confirmation in writing. A Development Package remains valid for a period of three (3) years from the date of approval. This Development Package will expire on March 9, 2015 per LUC 5.3.8.2.B. PLEASE HAVE THE CITY OF TUCSON APPROVAL STAMP PLACED ON EACH SHEET OF THE SUBMITTAL SET, PREFERABLY IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER NEAR THE TITLE BLOCK. THE STAMP IS LOCATED AT http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/CDRC___Rezoning/CDRC/CDRC_Stamp/cdrc_stamp.html BLUELINE SETS THAT DO NOT HAVE THE STAMP WILL BE RETURNED FOR CORRECTION. Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ |