Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - DP12-0006
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/27/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | Tucson Fire would prefer NO backflow preventer on fire line. Check valve on riser is adequate protection. If one is installed, method of flow full sprinkler demand (annually) must be provided. |
| 01/27/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 02/06/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The Building Demolition requires a separate building permit. SHEET 5 2. Please coordinate with the Zoning Reviewer requirements for an accessible route to the Mission Road right of way. 3. What's the purpose for the curb ramp leading to standard parking spaces? SHEET SD3 4. Detail 8: Delete the ADAAG requirement and reference the 2006 IBC, ICC A117.1, section 406. 5. Detail 1: The bottom of the main sign is to be 7'-0" a.f.g. as per COT DOT directive. 6. Detail 9: a. Detectable warnings are not required to an accessible parking aisle. This aisle is a safe zone. b. Ditto Comment 4. SHEET SD3 AND SD4 7. Where required by the 2006 IBC, ICC A117.1, detectable warning strips shell be used as per Sections 406.12 and 406.14 and shall be truncated domes as per Section 705.5. a. Detectable warning grooves are not acceptable as a detectable warning element. Please revise details 9/SD3, 10/SD4 and 11/SD4 accordingly. END OF REVIEW |
| 02/16/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned) b. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer c. the location of the building connection to the public sewer d. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes and cleanouts Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 02/21/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4 2. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g. 3. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. Identify screening elements. 4. Note: The screening requirement is in addition to the landscape requirements. 5. 10-03.4.0 RAINWATER HARVESTING PLAN 6. The Rainwater Harvesting Plan shall consist of two elements: a Site Water Budget and a Water Harvesting Implementation Plan. 7. Site Water Budget shall include calculations showing how 50 percent of landscape water demand as an average across the site will be met. 8. The Implementation Plan shall include a table detailing information for each identified Water Harvesting Infiltration Area (WHIA) at the site, and for the site as a whole, as described below. General WHIA information: a) WHIA identifier b) Spatial size (square feet) of WHIA c) Average depth (feet) of WHIA d) Capacity (gallons) of WHIA. 9. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 10. Additional comments may apply. |
| 02/21/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/23/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: DP12-0006 1795 W. Ajo Way Development Package TRANSMITTAL DATE: 02/24/2012 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-01.2.4 A title block shall be provided in the lower right corner of each sheet. 2. DS.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan document to include the correct site approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp. Provide on each sheet. 3. DS 2-01.2.6 Provide the location map in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. 4. DS 2-01.3.1 The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the developer of the project shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet 5. DS 2-01.3.2 The title block shall include the following information. A. The proposed name of the project or if there is no name, the proposed tenant's name. B. A brief legal description D. The administrative street address. E. Page number and number of pages. The page numbers shall run consecutive for the entire Development Package. 6. DS 2-01.3.4 The project-location map shall provide the following information. C. Section corners and north arrow 7. DS 2-01.3.7.A.1 On sheet SP0 provide the zoning boundaries for the entire shopping center as well as adjacent properties zoning. Indicate the existing zoning as C1 and C2. 8. DS 2-01.3.7.A.4 The indicated "Site Use" on sheet SP0 should be as follows: Food Service "30", subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.6.C and Sec. 3.5.13.5 9. DS 2-01.3.7.A.6.b On sheet SP0 revise the note indicating overlay zones to read as follows: This project has been designed to meet the criteria of: Sec. 2.8.2, Scenic Corridor Zone (SCZ); Sec.2.8.3 Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone; Sec. 2.8.4 Gateway Corridor Zone. 10. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide the allowed and proposed Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for the entire shopping center. Sec. LUC Sec. 3.2.3.2.B. Lot coverage calculations are not required for this project. Remove from plans. 11. DS 2-01.3.8.B Provide the recording information for the indicated 10' electric easement shown on sheet SP1. 12. DS 2-01.3.9.H.1 Provide a copy of the last approved site plan for the entire shopping center clearly indicating the following areas where developed as vehicle use areas. The area east and south of buildings B thru F appears to be a dirt area which is being changed to a vehicle use area for additional parking.. If this is the case, clearly indicate surfacing materials, width of PAALs, barriers to prevent access to the alley, etc. Contact Andrew Conner with landscape for further comments regarding landscape requirements for this area. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The vehicle parking spaces facing Mission Rd. may require wheel stops to prevent damage to the required 30" screen. Provide on site plan as well as details. (minimum 2'-6" from the front of the parking space). 13. DS 2-01.3.9.H.2 Provide future and existing sight visibility triangles for the vehicle entrances from Mission and Ajo Way and the intersection.. 14. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5 Provide details for a standard and handicap parking spaces with dimensions. 15. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.c Provide as a note the number of required and provided loading zones. FYI: No loading zone is required for this size building. 16. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Review LUC Sec. 3.3.8.2.B for the number of required short term and long term bicycle parking spaces. For this project the minimum number is 2 short term and 2 long term bicycle parking spaces. Revise calculations as well on sheet SP0. Provide location of the required long term bicycle parking spaces on the site plan. The vehicle parking calculations indicate that the entire shopping center is being parked at 1:300. This will require that the entire shopping center must meet the requirements for bicycle parking per LUC Sec. 3.3.8. Clearly indicate the location of all short term and long term bicycle parking spaces. Contact Tom Thivner for further information. Provide details clearly indicating the short term and long term bicycle parking spaces, racks, lockers, access aisle. See LUC Sec. 3.3.8. The short term bicycle parking rack indicated on detail 3/SD3 does not meet the requirements of LUC Sec. 3.3.9.5.A. Revise. Per LUC Sec. 3.3.9.3.B.1 Location. Short-term bicycle parking shall be: 1. Within fifty (50) feet of each public entrance to a building as measured along the most direct pedestrian route. Clearly indicate compliance. 17. DS 2-01.3.9.R Per DS 2-08.4.1.A A least one sidewalk shall be provided from a project to each street on which the project has frontage. Missing connecting to Mission Rd. 18. DS 2-01.3.3 This project has been assigned case number DP12-006, please place this number near the lower right corner of all sheets. On all of the civil sheets and the cover sheet the case number is indicated as DP-120006. Revise to DP12-0006. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 C:\planning\cdrc\DSD\DP12-0006.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 02/27/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Revise paragraph 1.2.4 of the drainage report to reflect the correct definition of zone x, where the map is not shaded: "Areas determined to be outside of the 0.2% annual chance floodplain." This should be corrected on sheet 1 of the Civil Improvement Plans. (FIRM panel legend) 2. Number all sheets in the plan set sequentially. 3. Clearly show and describe maintenance openings for the underground water storage system. (DS10-01.3.5.4) 4. Provide confirmation that ADOT has approved the improvements in the right of way. Contact Tom Martinez or Scott Beck for details. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/09/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |