Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP12-0004
Parcel: 137051240

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP12-0004
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
05/23/2012 JWILLIA4 START PLANS SUBMITTED Completed
05/23/2012 PGEHLEN1 COT NON-DSD TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT Approved I have no issues with this request/proposal.

CSO Becky Noel #37968
Tucson Police Dept
837-7428
05/23/2012 LEERAY HANLY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
05/31/2012 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: AutoZone - 675 W. Irvington Road.
Development Package (2nd Review)
DP12-0004

TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 31, 2012

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is January 10, 2013.

The following comments are based on Development Package Submittal Requirements;

2. See the LAYOUT TO BE USED WITH A DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE SUBMITTAL (DS 2-01) document located at http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/files/dsd/DevPackageSubmittalLayout.pdf and revise the drawing order, location of notes etc.:

The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0:

3. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.7 Provide the contour interval and all sheets.

4. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.2.B Provide a brief legal description in the title block.

5. This comment was not addressed. Zoning acknowledges that D.S. 2-01.3.2.D states that an administrative street address is to be provided in the title block. After discussion with Pima County Addressing the administrative street address is to be provided adjacent to the title block. Per D.S. 2-01.3.2.D Remove the address from the title block and place it adjacent to the title block in the lower right corner of the page.

6. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the page number and number of pages on sheets C0, C1.0, C1.A & D1.0. D.S. 2-01.3.2.E Provide the page number and number of pages in the title block.

7. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the relevant case numbers on sheets C0, C1.0, C1.A & D1.0. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the following relevant case numbers adjacent to the title block on each sheet; D12-0004, C9-12-02.

8. The Vicinity Map provided on sheet C0 shows "(NOT TO SCALE)" adjacent to "VICINITY MAP" at the top of the map, and under "VICINITY MAP" under the map it shows "3" - 1 MILE", clarify that this map is to scale. Also per D.S. 2-01-6 A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover
9. sheet. And this map should meet the requirements of D.S. 2-01.3.4. D.S. 2-01.3.4 The project-location map shall cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile.

10. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.2.4.C Label the section corners on the location map.

11. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.3 Zoning acknowledges that the "Preliminary Conditions" shown on sheet C0 match the approved rezoning conditions, remove the "Preliminary Conditions" statement from the rezoning conditions shown on sheet C0.

12. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. That said provide the existing use and the proposed use should be listed as "GENERAL MERCHANDISE SALES "28", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.9.2.C".

13. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Revise "GENERAL NOTE" 5 to read "THIS PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO MEET THE OVERLAY ZONE(S) CRITERIA: SEC. 2.8.3, MAJOR STREETS AND ROUTES (MS&R) SETBACK ZONE"

14. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide a Floor Area Ratio on the plan, see LUC Section 3.2.11

15. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.8.B Provide the recordation information for all easements shown on the plan.

16. This comment was not addressed. Show the PUE "TO BE ABANDONED, per SEQUENCE #?????". D.S. 2-01.3.8.B The "10' PUE" shown running through the building will need to be vacated prior to approval of the Development Package.

17. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.8.C The following information will be provided for all existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks.

18. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. If the property is being rezoned, use those boundaries and classifications.

19. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.2 Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section.

20. This comment was not fully addressed. Indicated if existing streets are public or private; and provided fully dimensioned, widths, curbs, sidewalks. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.4 Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide street names, widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned.

21. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a As a note, provide calculations on the number of vehicle parking spaces required (include the ratio used) and the number provided, including the number of spaces required and provided for the physically disabled.

22. This comment was not addressed correctly. Per LUC Section 3.3.6.8.C. When required, wheel stop curbing must be two and one-half (2½) feet from the front of the parking
23. space. (See Illustration 3.3.6.8.C). Detail 6, Sheet C1.A shows 2' to the middle of the stop. Review the provided LUC Section and revise your detail. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Detail 6/C1.A HANDICAP PARKING DETAIL, show the wheel stops on the detail as shown on the plan and provided location dimensions per LUC Section 3.3.6.8.C.

24. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide a Short & Long Term bicycle parking calculation on the plan. This calculation should show the required and provided number.

25. This comment was not fully addressed. For the multiply Short-Term racks shown, provide a layout detail that shows the require distance between racks, LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.6, show that the racks are a minimum of 2'-6" from the parking area access lane (PAAL), LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.6. See LUC figure 3.3.9.5. Provide a detail for the require Long-term bicycle parking. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Provide a detail for both Short & Long Term bicycle parking that clearly shows how the following LUC Sections are met; LUC 3.3.9.2., .3 & .4.

26. D.S. 2-01.3.9.I Based on your response to comment 16 there is no right-of-way dedication proposed but the site plan shows a "NEW ROW LINE", clarify. If no dedication is planed show the "NEW ROW LINE" as future.

27. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O Provide building setback dimensions to all streets based on LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B and table 3.2.6.I. Building setback requirements cannot be verified until exterior wall heights are provided.

28. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the building height within in the building foot print. As the building height was not provide the requirements of rezoning condition #12 "Structures shall be limited to single-story and 21 feet in height." cannot be verified. Also sheet C0, "MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: 30 FEET" needs to be revised to reflect the rezoning condition for height of the building.

29. This comment was not addressed. Keynote 16 states "Concrete sidewalk - see detail 19 & 20/C1.A for sidewalks around building. Details 19 & 20 do not exist on sheet C1.A, it appears that it should be details 27 & 28 but neither detail provides width dimensions. Detail 28 shows "Width SEE PLANS". D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Provide a width dimension for the side walk that runs south to Nevada Street on the plan.

30. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R KEYNOTE 16, Sheet C1.0 calls out sidewalk details 19 & 20/C1.A. Zoning could not find details 19 & 20 on Sheet C1.A.

31. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide a note or indicate graphically how all rezoning conditions have been met. D.S. 2-01.3.9.U Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning.

32. This comment was not addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.W Add the following statement to Keynote 20 "SIGN UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT".

33. This comment was not fully addressed. Provide the CDRC stamp on sheets C0,C1.A, D1.0, L11, L12, L13 & L14. Provide the CDRC stamp on all sheets of the development package. This stamp can be found at the following web site http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP12-0004

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package, County Assessor's Combination Request Form and Covenant Regarding Development and Use of Real Property.
05/31/2012 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Denied COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES

June 26, 2012

Zach Hilgart
Hilgart Wilson
12435 N. 69th Drive
Peoria, Arizona 85381

Subject: DP12-0004 AUTOZONE #4096 Development Package

Dear Zach:

Your submittal for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 3 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed:

ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE ROLLED

3 Copies of Revised Development Package (PDSD2, Wastewater)

2 Copies of Red Line Plan (For Comparison) (PDSD2)

2 Copies of Revised Drainage Report (PDSD2)

2 Copies of Revised SWPPP (PDSD2)

1 CD of all plans and documents above (PDSD)

1 Check made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $39.00 (Wastewater)

Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893.

Sincerely,




John Williams
Planning Technician

All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/

Via fax: zhilgart@hilgartwilson.com
06/13/2012 RONALD BROWN ZONING HC REVIEW Denied SHEET C-1
1. Note 17 refers to details 2/C1A and 6/C-1A for ramp details. What does detail 2 have to do with ramps?
2. Note 16 refers to details 19 and 20/C-1A. There are no such details.
3. Please show a concrete ramp at the South 13th Street right of way connection as depicted on the Site Plan of Sheet C-2.1.
SHEET C-1A
4. At Detail 6:
a. Stop the diagonal striping at the concrete landing edge.
b. The poche' symbol used on the concrete ramps generally depict truncated domes. Detectable warning strips are not required at this location. Please remove the symbolism.
c. Please note that the grades at the accessible parking areas can not slope more than 2% in all directions.
5. At detail 12, as per COT DOT directive, the bottom of the main sign shall be at 7'-0" from the finished grade.
SHEET C-2.1
6. Note 31 states to install handrails as per the architectural drawings. There are not architectural drawings with this submittal.
a. Please provide a large scale detail of this ramp and provide all accessibility requirements as per ICC A117.1, section 405 including but not limited to the following: dimensions, grade elevations, ramps, landings, and handrails. b. Please provide a large scale elevation detail of the required handrails in compliance with ICC A117.1, Sections 405.8 and 505.
7. Where does note 16 apply?
END OF REVIEW
06/13/2012 JOHN BEALL COT NON-DSD COMMUNITY PLANNING Denied PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
COMMENTS

Regarding

SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application

CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT

DP12-0004 Auto Zone _ #4096 _Irvington Rd.

() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Revised Plan/Plat
() Board of Adjustment
() Other - Elevations

CROSS REFERENCE:

NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: 12th Avenue/Valencia Rd Area Plan

GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO

COMMENTS DUE BY: June 20, 2012

SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

() No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment
() Proposal Complies with Annexation or Rezoning Conditions
() RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies
(X) See Additional Comments Attached
() No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on:
(X) Resubmittal Required:
() Tentative Plat
(X) Development Plan
(X) Landscape Plan
() Other


REVIEWER:msp 791-5505 DATE: 06/11/12
Planning and Development Services Department
Community Planning Section
DP12 0004 - Auto Zone # 4096 - Irvington Road
June 11, 2012

The Auto Zone project is being processed for development plan DP12-0004 and Rezoning case C9-12-02. Rezoning case C9-12-02 was approved by Mayor and Council on May 22, 2012, under Ordinance 10985. Prior to the approval of development plan DP12-0004, it shall be required to be in full compliance with all C9-12-02 rezoning conditions.

Staff offers the following comments:

1. Please revise development plan, sheet CO, to indicate rezoning case C9-12-02 was approved on May 22, 2012, under Ordinance 10985 and list all rezoning conditions verbatim, as shown on Ordinance 19085. Remove any language which states these are preliminary rezoning conditions.
2. Revise development plan, sheet CO, General Note A.2.A to indicate rezoning of lots 3 & 4 will change from C-2 to C-1 under the rezoning C9-12-02. Current development plan proposal states the lots 1 & 2 will remain C-2 commercial zone.
3. Please revise development plan comply with rezoning condition #12, which requires maximum building height not to exceed twenty-one (21) feet. Current proposal on sheet CO, shows thirty (30) feet.
4. Provide in color, building elevations to comply with rezoning condition #15, which requires the west and south building façade to show there are no wall-painted or wall-mounted sign(s), or any other form of permanent or temporary advertisement. Development plan submittal did not include any building elevations.
5. Please revise development plan to comply with rezoning conditions # 16 & 17.
6. Please revise development plan landscape plan, sheet L12, to comply with rezoning condition # 22, which requires canopy trees to be planted twenty-five (25) feet on center, within the landscape borders along the western and southern perimeters, subject to traffic site visibility requirements.
7. Revise development plan to include wall elevations calling out material to show compliance with rezoning condition # 9. This condition applies to perimeter walls on the west and south perimeters.
06/14/2012 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Revise the landscape plans to comply with conditions #19 & 22 related to rezoning case C9-12-02

2. A street landscape border, per Sec. 3.7.2.4 of the LUC, is a landscape area with a minimum width of ten (10) feet, running the full length of the street property line(s) bounding the site except for points of ingress-egress. Dimension landscape borders on 13th Ave & Nevada St.

3. Street landscape borders shall be located entirely on site, except that, if approved by the City Engineer or designee, up to five (5) feet of the required ten (10) foot width be placed within the adjacent right-of-way area or within the Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) right-of-way area. Indicate Right of Way dimensions identical to the site plan on the landscape submittal. If landscaping is proposed within the public ROW Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements.

4. Fifty (50) percent or more of the street landscape border area must have shrubs and vegetative ground cover per LUC 3.7.2.4

5. Indicate square footage of all landscaped areas and calculation of the percentage of vegetative coverage per DS 2-07.2.2.2.g.

6. A 30" continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I.

7. Walls, fences, or other screening must be placed behind the landscape border. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.2.

8. Planting Plan. The planting plan and layout calculations will include both the proper and common name of each type of plant material. Including existing vegetation to remain in place or transplanted on-site.

9. All disturbed, grubbed, graded, or bladed areas not otherwise improved shall be landscaped, reseeded, or treated with an inorganic or organic ground cover to help reduce dust pollution including. the area between the right-of-way line and sidewalk and the area between the sidewalk and the curb, if not covered with vegetation, also shall be covered with an appropriate inorganic ground cover, such as decomposed granite. Revise the plans as necessary. LUC 3.7.2.4.A.4

10. All commercial development and site plans submitted after June 1, 2010, shall include a rainwater harvesting plan. The rainwater harvesting plan shall include a landscape water budget and an implementation plan. DS 10-03.

a. The landscape water budget shall calculate the estimated volume of water required yearly for all site landscaping detailed in the development and/or landscape plan.

b. The implementation plan shall show how any combination of capture, conveyance, storage, and distribution will be utilized on-site to harvest rainwater. Implementation plans shall comply with applicable development standards for water harvesting applications.

c. The implementation plan shall also provide for water metering of all on-site landscape water through either:

d. A separate water meter connected to the main water supply; or, An irrigation sub-meter.
e. The rainwater harvesting plan shall be submitted concurrently with the site plan and landscape plan.

11.Provide NPP plan per DS 2-15 or acceptable documentation, which clearly indicates that the project will not impact Protected Native Plants. Such documentation includes photographs of the site taken from all sides of the property per DS 2-15.2.0.C.

12. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan.


13. Additional comments may apply.
06/14/2012 LAITH ALSHAMI ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 06/14/2012,

SUBJECT: AutoZone #4096
DP12-0004, T15S, R13E, SECTION 02

RECEIVED: Development Package on May 23 11, 2012

1. The subject submittal has been reviewed and it can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that were made and references the exact location in the drainage report and on the Development Package where the revisions were made. Responses such as "revised" are not adequate and prolong the review process. Additionally, provide a copy of the red lined plan for comparison :

Drainage Report:

1. If runoff retention is not required and not provided, a percolation test is not required as long as the waterharvesting depth does not exceed 6 inches. Additionally, based on previous experiences with drywell installations in Tucson, the City decided not to permit drywells, because most installed drywells are not maintained properly and consequently they do not operate efficiently. Remove the reference to drywells on the plans.
2. Label the right of way widths shown on the drainage exhibit as half widths.
3. Address, in the report, drainage facilities maintenance requirement and responsibility and specify that the inspection shall be performed by a registered civil engineer annually and/or after every major storm. Additionally, provide a drainage facilities maintenance checklist to facilitate the required maintenance.

Cover Sheet:

1. Relabel the "Preliminary Conditions" as "Rezoning Conditions" and revise the text font to at least 3/32inch in height to assure the plan will be legible during review and when digitized and/or reduced for archiving (D.S. 2-01.2.3).

EVERY PAGE OF PACKAGE:

1. Provide the sheet numbers for the first 4 sheets based on the "Index of Drawings" provided on the first sheet.
2. A three (3) inch by five (5) inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp (D.S. 2-01.2.5). Additionally, the reduced size stamp shown on Sheet C1.0 shall be revised to the normal size.
3. The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet (D.S. 2-01.2.7).
4. Provide the DP12-0004 case number and Rezoning Case Number C9-12-02 on the first 4 sheets as required by D.S. 2-01.3.3.

BASE LAYER SHEET COMMENTS:

1. Provide the proper documentation that verifies the completion of the lot combo process.
2. Provide the tie between the basis of bearing and one of the corners of the parcel (D.S. 2-01.3.8.A).
3. All easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. Blanket easements should be listed in the notes, together with recordation data and their proposed status. Should an easement not be in use and be proposed for vacation or have been abandoned, so indicate. However, should the easement be in conflict with any proposed building location, vacation of the easement shall occur prior to approval of plan unless written permission from easement holder(s) is provided (D.S. 2-01.3.8.B) and (D.S. 2-01.3.9.L).

Site/Grading Plan:

1. The following information regarding existing private or public right-of-way adjacent to or within the site shall be provided: the name, right-of-way width, recordation data, type and dimensioned width of paving, curbs, curb cuts, and sidewalks (D.S. 2-01.3.8.C). Provide all missing information.
2. Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site will be shown (D.S. 2-01.3.8.F). The response "revised" is not understood. Does it mean there are drainage facilities or not.
3. The sight triangle dimensions shall be based on the intersection of a Drive/PAAL and an Arterial along Irvington Road and the intersection of a Drive/PAAL and a Local along 13th Avenue and Nevada Street. Revise the sight triangles accordingly (D.S. 20-1.3.9.H.2).
4. Indicate if existing streets are public or private; provide the street widths, curbs, sidewalks, and utility locations, all fully dimensioned (D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.4).
5. Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction, and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow (D.S. 2-01.3.9.N.2). Clarify which detail has been added to the plan to demonstrate compliance with this comment.
6. Provide drainage arrows to indicate the proposed building roof drainage (D.S. 2-01.3.9.N.2).
7. Draw locations and indicate types of off-site runoff acceptance points and/or onsite runoff discharge points (D.S. 2-01.3.9.N.7).
8. Revise the Development Plan Package according to the Drainage Report revisions.

SWPPP:

Provide a SWPPP report that is based on ADEQ Guidelines. It should include, among other things, the following:

1. Provide in the report a SWPPP exhibit and show the grading and disturbance limits on the exhibit.
2. Place controls inside grading limits.
3. Include in the sequence of activities, as the first two activities, determining the disturbance limits, and installing the proposed BMP's within these limits.
4. Provide blank NOI forms for the unknown operators. (Part IV.F) Each operator is responsible for submitting a completed NOI to ADEQ and to the City of Tucson. Please note that the remaining signatures from the operators must be on the onsite copy of the SWPPP at or before commencement of construction.
5. Include a copy of the authorization certificate received from ADEQ (Part III.D.2).
6. Include a dated and signed certification form for each known operator (including the owner) in accordance with Part VII.K. (Part IV.J.1). Provide blank certification copies for unknown operators.
7. Identify any city or county which received a copy of the authorization certificate (Part III.D.4).
8. Describe the construction activity (what is being built, what is being disturbed, how long it is expected to take, etc.) (Part III.C.2).
9. Describe, if applicable, any pollutant sources from areas other than dirt moving (e.g., dedicated concrete and asphalt plants, fueling operations, material or waste storage etc., that are associated with the construction project). Identify where these sources are or will occur on site (Part III.C.6).
10. Identify the nearest receiving waters on the Location Map (Part III.C.4).
11. It is recommended to protect the inlets of the basins in order prevent fine sediments from entering the basins during construction.
12. Revise the SWPPP exhibits in accordance with the Site and Grading Plan comments.


If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov


RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan Package
06/18/2012 MARTIN BROWN COT NON-DSD FIRE Approved
06/19/2012 TIM ROWE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER Denied PIMA COUNTY
REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT
201 NORTH STONE AVENUE
TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207
JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500
DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135


June 14, 2012



To: ZACH HILGART
HILGART / WILSON, LLC

Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager
City of Tucson Development Services Department


____________________________________________
From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department

Subject: AUTOZONE STORE NO. 4098
Development Plan - 2nd submittal
DP12-0004

The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use:

1. Sheet 1: Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD's Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at:

http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits

The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Ref. A.

2. Sheet 9: The 4" BCS and cleanouts are private. The elements are listed under public sewer construction notes. Revise the plan to clearly call out the entire 4" line and elements from the point of connection to the building as private. Ref. A

3. Sheet 9: Call out all of the inverts for all of the proposed private cleanouts. Ref. A
4. Sheet 9: The cleanout called out by Note #5 needs to be located at least 5' inside the property line. Ref. A

This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents.

Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet.

The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $39.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter.

If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly.


cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________
Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager
DLU Project folder

Ref. A. Development Plan Checklist Requirements - Chapter 18.71 of the Pima County Code - Section J
http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf

Ref. C - Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapters 5 & 9 (R18-5-205)
http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-05.htm
and (R-18-9-E301)
http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-09.htm

Ref. D - PCRWRD Procedures, Preliminary Sewer Layout Requirements, 1984 (revised April 1988)
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/procedures.pdf

Ref. E - PCRWRD Design Standards for Public Sewerage Facilities, 1983 (revised April 1988)
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/design_standards.pdf

Ref. F - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/all_det.pdf

Ref. G - Pima County Code of Ordinances, Title 13 - Public Services, Division II - Sewers
http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=16119&stateID=3&statename=Arizona

Ref. H - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, 2003 Edition
http://dot.pima.gov/transeng/stdspecsdet/standardspecs2003.pdf

Ref. I - PCRWRD Engineering Directives
http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/directives/
06/25/2012 JWILLIA4 ENV SVCS REVIEW Approved Based page C2.2 and the associated details this project is approved for Solid Waste and Recycle. Sorry for the late entry.

Jeff
06/25/2012 KAY MARKS PIMA COUNTY ADDRESSING Denied 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL
TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207

AUDREY FARENGA
ADDRESSING REVIEW
PH #: 740-6800
FAX #: 623-5411


TO: CITY PLANNING
FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW
SUBJECT: DP12-0004 AUTOZONE STORE NO. 4098/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
DATE: June 25, 2012



The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval:

1. Include title blocks with all the required information on the bottom right hand corner of all pages per letter dated 02-06-12.
2. Delete all street directions per letter dated 02-06-12.
3. Correct the tax codes with the most current.
4. Include the file number DP12-0004.