Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG
Permit Number - DP12-0002
Review Name: DEV PKG
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/06/2012 | CPIERCE1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 01/06/2012 | CPIERCE1 | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | No comments received from Rarks and Rec. |
| 01/09/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/12/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | No comments received from Rarks and Rec. |
| 01/12/2012 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Denied | Symbols for 2 new fire hydrants appear on plan, but no corresponding note. Please clarify. Building will require fire sprinklers. Please show location and size of tap, with corresponding note. |
| 01/12/2012 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | No comments received from Rarks and Rec. |
| 01/18/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | DETAIL 11/DP-7 1. Detectable warnings are not required prior to entering an accessible parking aisle. 2. Please provide one "Van Accessible" parking space with dimensions of 8', 8', 8' or 8', 11' 8'. Please identify the Van Accessible space on the floor plan. 3. Please insure that all accessibnle route slopes comply with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3. END OF REVIEW |
| 01/20/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The presence of manholes in a private sewer collection system will require review of the sewer design by the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality. Submit the design to PDEQ at 150 W Congress St, 1st Floor (740-3340). A separate plumbing permit from Development Services will be required for construction of the private sewer collection system. 2. Where the finish floor elevation is less than 12 inches above the elevation of the next upstream manhole or cleanout in the public sewer or private sewer collection system (e.g. Walgreen's and Pad A, a backwater valve shall be installed in the building drain or branch of the building drain serving that floor. Floors discharging from above that reference point shall not discharge through the backwater valve. Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. |
| 01/20/2012 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Denied | Office of the Pima County Assessor 115 N. Church Ave. Tucson, Arizona 85701 BILL STAPLES ASSESSOR TO: CDRC Office Subdivision Review City of Tucson (FAX# 791-5559) FROM: Sherry Hyde Senior Property Technician Pima County Assessor’s Office DATE: 1/20/12 RE: Assessor’s Review and Comments Regarding DP12-0002 TENTATIVE PLAT FOR REVIEW OF WALGREENS & PAD A * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Plat meets Assessor’s Office requirements. ___X___ Plat does not meet Assessor’s Office requirements. COMMENTS: THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A PAGE TO REVIEW FOR THE TENTATIVE PLAT. THE SUBDIVISION PLAT NEEDS TO CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING: • THE TITLE BLOCK MUST BE IN THE LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER; IT MUST HAVE THE NUMBER OF LOTS OR UNITS OR BLOCKS OR ANY COMBINATION OF THESE. IT MUST HAVE THE COMMON AREAS LISTED, IF THERE ARE ANY. IT MUST HAVE THE SECTION, TOWNSHIP AND RANGE AND IF IT IS A RESUBDIVISON, IT MUST MENTION THE PLAT NAME AND THE MAP & PLAT. • THE PERIMETER LINE MUST BE SOLID AND THE HEAVIEWT LINEWEIGHT ON THE PLAT. THE LOT LINES AND COMMON AREA LINES MUST BE SOLID AND THE NEXT HEAVIEST. LINES FOR EROSION SETBACKS, FLOODPLAIN ETC. SHOULD BE THE LIGHTEST LINEWEIGHT AND BE DASHED OR DOT-DASHED. • THERE MUST BE BEARINGS AND DIMENSIONS FOR THE PERIMETER AND ALL LOT LINES AND ALL COMMON AREAS. • ALL LOTS MUST BE NUMBERED AND HAVE SQUARE FOOTAGE. • ALL HATCHING, STIPPLING, STRIPING ETC. MUST BE REMOVED IN THE FINAL PLAT, UNLESS ANOTHER AGENCY REQUIRES IT. IF SO ALL LETTERING MUST HAVE THE HATCHING, ETC. CUT AWAY SO THEY ARE LEGIBLE. • ALL ADJACENT SUBDIVISONS SHOULD BE NAMED, WITH MAP & PLAT IN THE APPROPRIATE AREAS AROUND THE SUBDIVISION. • THE FIRST PAGE SHOWS OWNERSHIP TO BE EVERGREEN DEVCO & THE APPLICATION PAGE SHOWS AFFECTED PARCELS 123-13-0920, 0910, 0900, 0880, 0720, 0730 & 0740. OUR RECORDS DO NOT SHOW ANY OF THESE PARCELS IN THE NAME OF EVERGREEN DEVCO & I CANNOT LOCATE ANY RECORDED DOCUMENT PLACING THESE PARCELS IN THAT OWNERSHIP. NOTE: THE ASSESSOR’S CURRENT INVOLVEMENT IN PROCESSING ITS MANUAL MAPS TO DIGITAL FORMAT IS EXPEDITED GREATLY BY EXCHANGE OF DIGITAL DATA. IN THE COURSE OF RECORDING THIS SUBDIVISION YOUR ASSISTANCE IN PROVIDING THIS OFFICE WITH AN AUTOCAD COPY WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED. THANK YOU FOR ANY DIGITAL DATA PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED. |
| 01/20/2012 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 January 19, 2012 To: ADAM RAUSCHER OPTIMUS CIVIL DESIGN GROUP Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: WALGREENS AND PAD A Site Plan – 1st submittal DP12-0002 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Sheet 1: Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD’s Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Ref. A. 2. Sheet 1: Revise General Note #11 to read as follows (Ref. A.): THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS, EXCEPT PUBLIC SEWERS WITHIN PUBLIC SEWER EASEMENTS OR RIGHTS-OF-WAY, WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. 3. Sheet 3: The proposed public MH #2 should be shown on-site approximately 5’ east of the property line enclosed within a 20’ x 20’ public sewer easement. The proposed sewer line upstream of MH #2 should be called out as private. Ref. A. and E 4. Sheet 3: Provide a document which demonstrates an association which would provide for the maintenance of the private common sewer between the two lots shown on plan or a private joint use agreement and private sewer easement will be required. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder Ref. A. Development Plan Checklist Requirements – Chapter 18.71 of the Pima County Code - Section J http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf Ref. C - Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapters 5 & 9 (R18-5-205) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-05.htm and (R-18-9-E301) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-09.htm Ref. D - PCRWRD Procedures, Preliminary Sewer Layout Requirements, 1984 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/procedures.pdf Ref. E - PCRWRD Design Standards for Public Sewerage Facilities, 1983 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/design_standards.pdf Ref. F - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/all_det.pdf Ref. G - Pima County Code of Ordinances, Title 13 - Public Services, Division II - Sewers http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=16119&stateID=3&statename=Arizona Ref. H - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, 2003 Edition http://dot.pima.gov/transeng/stdspecsdet/standardspecs2003.pdf Ref. I - PCRWRD Engineering Directives http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/directives/ |
| 01/20/2012 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: DP12-0002 WALGREENS/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: January 19, 2012 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: 1. The Location Map must be 3”= 1 Mile. Please correct. 2. Include labeled section corners. 3. Include a legal description on all title blocks. 4. Spell out all street suffixes. 5. On the Development Package Application tax code 123-13-0880 is listed as one of the tax codes of this project. Should it be 123-13-0890 instead? |
| 01/23/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The Landscape Section recommends approval subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1) Add the CDRC case number and any related case numbers to the landscape and native plant preservation plans. DS 2-07.2.1.B 2) Revise the plans to comply with any authorized conditions of rezoning. Clarify how any landscape or screening related conditions are met on the landscape plans. |
| 01/23/2012 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: DP12-0002 Walgreens and Pad A - 1st Ave. Development Package TRANSMITTAL: 01/23/2012 DUE DATE: 01/23/2012 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 01/08/2013. 2. DS 2-01.3.2. The title block shall include the following information: B. A brief legal description and a statement as to whether the project is a resubdivision (which this project is) are to be provided. On resubdivisions, provide the recording information of the existing subdivision plat. C. The number of proposed lots are to be noted. E. The page number and number of pages are to include the entire development package, grading, landscape, etc. 3. DS 2-01.3.3 The case number indicated near the title block for the BOA variance is incorrect. The correct number is C10-11-21. Revise. 4. DS 2-01.3.7.A.3 This plan/plat has been prepared in conjunction with a rezoning application, add the following note next to the existing zoning note: "Proposed zoning is C-1." 5. DS 2-01.3.7.A.4 Identify the existing and proposed use of the property as classified per the Land Use Code. List all Land Use Code sections each proposed use is subject to. Food Service "28", subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.6.A and .C and General Merchandise Sales "28", subject to: Sec. 3.5.9.2.C 6. DS 2-01.3.7.A.6.a List special exceptions, zoning variances, zoning and development standard modifications, overlay zones, and other reviews that are applicable to the project. Such as: Sec. 5.1.7, Board of Adjustment (BOA) As a general note provide the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and the conditions of approval. Provide a separate letter clearly indicating how conditions of the BOA variance have been met. 7. DS 2-01.3.9.G If the project is to be phased, provide calculations, setbacks, etc., to indicate that each phase complies with all requirements as a separate entity. Show phase lines on the drawing. Show and label any temporary improvements that may be needed to make the site function for each phase as one entity. This project is a phased project therefore provide calculations for each phase showing how each phase will meet the minimum code requirements. Clearly indicate how vehicle use areas will be provided with barriers to prevent access into phase two. Provide all calculations showing how each phase will function, vehicle parking, bicycle parking, FAR clacs, etc. Provide phase lines on the development plan. Remove the existing zoning boundary lines from the plan. 8. DS 2-01.3.8.B If applicable provide all easements on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated 9. DS 2-01.3.9.A Clarify the property lines at the southwest corner of Lot #2. Where do they connect? 10. DS 2-01.3.9.H Per LUC Sec.3.2.8.2 the alley access at the southeast corner of the property is not allowed as an access to the property. A Board of Adjustment variance would be required to be submitted and approved. BOA variance C10-11-21 did not address this issue. 11. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Clearly indicate the dimension from the front of the parking spaces to the 30" screen wall. If less than 2' -6" wheel stops will be required in each parking space to prevent damage to the screen wall. Provide on the detail for the standard parking spaces the location of the wheel stops (min. 2'-6" from the front of the parking space. Show any required wheel stops on the development plan. 12. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Per LUC Sec. 3.3.9.3.B the short term bicycle parking must be located within 50' of the main entrance to the building. Clearly indicate how this requirement is to be met for both buildings. Per detail 4-DP-7 there is 5' clear area on both ends of the long term bicycle parking lockers. Per the location on the development plan this does not appear to have been provided. Clarify. On detail 5-DP-7 the minimum distance between short term bicycle racks is 4' not 30" as indicated. Revise. See LUC Sec.3.3.9.5.B. 13. DS 2-01.3.9.O On sheet DP-1 in the required building setbacks section the indicated required setbacks are incorrect. The required setback from all three streets is 21' or the height of the wall of the building whichever is greater from the back of future curb or along Hampton form the edge of the nearest travel lane. Revise notes. Remove setback lines and provide dimensions from the buildings to the appropriate points. This reviewer has not seen the BOA variance case but per discussion with Russlyn Wells the setback per the variance along the residential zoned property has bee allowed to be reduced to 31'. At the southwest corner of Lot 2 the dimension shown is 30'. This does not met the requirements of the variance. A resubmittal may be required, contact Russlyn Wells. There is a projection indicated along the east side of the Walgreens building extending into the required setback. Per LUC Sec. 3.2.6.6.A the maximum allowed roof overhang is 2' into the required setback. At a minimum a Design Development Option will be required to reduce this setback. May be included into the BOA variance. 14. DS 2-01.3.9.U Indicate graphically, where possible, compliance with conditions of rezoning. Provide a separate letter clearly indicating how conditions of rezoning have been met. 15. DS 2-01.3.9. V Please indicate the location and type of postal service to assure there are no conflicts with other requirements. If mail is to be delivered to an area within a building please state so on the plan. 16. The two parcels (123-13-0750 and 123-13-0760) both had alley access prior to this development. Provide documentation clearly indicating that this right has been abandoned or provide access to the rear of both of these properties. 17. This plan has been reviewed without complete information, BOA not complete, rezoning not complete. Additional comments may be forth coming based on changes to the plan and additional information being provided. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\DP12-0002dp.doc |
| 01/24/2012 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#245276 January 24, 2012 Optimus Civil Design Group Attn: Adam Rauscher 4650 E Cotton Center Blvd Suite 200 Phoenix, Arizona 85040 Dear Mr. Raucher: SUBJECT: Walgreens and Pad A DP12-0002 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted January 9, 2012. It appears that there is a conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Existing overhead facility in alley will have to be relocated to underground. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 01/24/2012 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | From: Tom Martinez [mailto:TMartinez@azdot.gov] Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 6:18 AM To: Jeff Behrana Subject: RE: Walgreens @ 1st Av & Grant- Tucson It's no where near any ADOT facilities! |
| 01/24/2012 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | January 23, 2012 DP12-0012 Engineering Review Resubmittals Required: Revise Development Package and Revise Drainage Report The Development Package cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following comments: 1. Provide the correct description of the floodplain status for this parcel in the "Floodplain Information" section of the general notes. 2. Please proofread the general notes. For example note 27 reads "The owners or owners…." 3. Use the correct rezoning case number in the heading for the rezoning conditions. Also ensure that the listed conditions match the conditions approved by Mayor and Council. 4. Provide sight visibility triangles for the street intersection corners as well as for the driveways. 5. Provide dimensions for the entry and exit drives to Grant Road. 6. Clarify whether the additional right of way has been or will be dedicated. Provide recordation information or indicate that it will be dedicated by this plat, as applicable. 7. Provide correct references to COT Standard Details. For example keynote 26 on DP3 doesn't refer to the correct detail. 8. Provide a notarized agreement between the developer and the adjacent property owners providing for the construction and future maintenance of the wall proposed on the property line or on the adjacent property as indicated by keynote 15. 9. Provide details for the solid waste container enclosures to ensure that they meet the requirements of Development Standard 6-01 as revised in April 2011. 10. Check the locations and descriptions for the construction notes. For example note 31 (Existing driveway to be removed) and 22 (Existing concrete curb to remain) are pointed at the same feature along Hampton Street. Along the driveway entrance from 1st Avenue vertical curb is shown in a curb access ramp. 11. Note 46 indicates that the width of the depressed curb is noted on the plan sheet, ensure that this is provided for all instances and that all required data is provided. 12. Clarify note 55. The maximum height of an obstruction within a sight visibility triangle is 30 inches above the gutter elevation. Revise the wall location or height. 13. Confirm drainage patterns or provide sufficient spot elevations to demonstrate that drainage is not directed uphill. 14. Provide loading zone dimensions in both directions. 15. Provide a detail of the compactor enclosure to demonstrate that sufficient clearance is provided per DS 6-01. 16. Show the regulatory floodplain boundaries within Hampton Street along with water surface contours. 17. The discharge quantities on the DP should match the discharges reported in the drainage report. 18. Revise the comments in the drainage report to more accurately reflect the existing conditions. For example, page 4 indicates that the existing drainage areas are all 100% impervious. Additional comments may be forthcoming on future reviews. Loren Makus Senior Engineering Associate |
| 01/24/2012 | JWILLIA4 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 01/24/2012 | JWILLIA4 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Date Case Number Project Address January 23, 2012 DP12-0002 WALGREENS Development Plan Comments: Denied, The proposed development plan for Case No. DP12-0002, Walgreens dose not the meet the minimum requirements for Environmental Services, Solid Waste and Recycle materials Disposal Standard 6-01. 1. The proposed development plan for the WALGREENS to be located at Grant Road and 1st Avenue must state the physical street address on the title block of each sheet of the proposed plans. 2. The Development Plan must include recycle containers and must be shown and labeled on the site plan. 3. All containers will require masonry enclosures with gates, and a detailed of the enclosures must be shown and dimensioned on the plans in accordance’s with the must current Development Standard No. 6-01.0. 4. Containers location shown on the Development Plans must be labeled for their intended us being Solid Waste or Recycle materials. 5 A detail plan for the container enclosures must be shown on the plans with the inside dimension between the bollards. The minimum inside dimension must not be less than 10’- 0”. As shown on the must current Development Standard No. 6-01.0. . 6 All enclosures must show the gates installed and mounted on the end of the CMU walls or mounted on separate post as show on Solid Waste Standards. The minimum inside dimension between the gates must not be less then 12’-0”. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 01/24/2012 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Passed | No comments received from Rarks and Rec. |
| 01/24/2012 | JWILLIA4 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 01/24/2012 | JWILLIA4 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 01/26/2012 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES January 26, 2012 Adam Rauscher Optimus Civil Design Group 4650 E. Cotton Center Blvd. # 200 Phoenix, AZ 85040 Subject: DP12-0002 WALGREENS AND PAD-A Development Plan/Tentative Plat Dear Adam: Your submittal of January 9, 2012 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 12 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 12 Copies Revised DP/TP (Fire, HC Site, Plumbing, Addressing, Wastewater, Assessor, Landscape, Zoning, Engineering, Env Svcs, Traffic, PDSD) 2 Copies Common Wall Agreement Documents (Engineering, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to “Pima County Treasurer” for $100.00 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at (520) 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via email: arauscher@optimuscdg.com |
| 03/20/2012 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approv-Cond | No comments received from Rarks and Rec. |
| 03/20/2012 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approv-Cond | January 25, 2012 ACTIVITY NUMBER: DP12-0002 PROJECT NAME: Walgreens PROJECT ADDRESS: 1st & Grant PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Traffic Engineering recommends a conditional approval of the Development Plan. Please note that a private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the right-of-way. An approved development plan is required prior to applying for a PIA. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/26/2012 | JWILLIA4 | APPROVAL SHELF | Completed |
| 01/26/2012 | JWILLIA4 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 01/26/2012 | JWILLIA4 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |