Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP12-0001
Parcel: 123140600

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING

Permit Number - DP12-0001
Review Name: RESUB - SITE and/or GRADING
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
08/21/2012 MICHAEL ST. PAUL ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL


FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician

PROJECT:
DP12-0001 (T12CM00034)
774 East Seneca Street
Two duplexes (4units w/ 4 bedrooms in each unit)


TRANSMITTAL: August 20, 2012


COMMENTS: This project is review per Development Standards Number 2-01 for a Development Package. Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1) This site is located in the R-2 zone (LUC Section 2.3.5.2.A.2). The Development Designator is "K" (LUC Sections 2.3.5.2.A.2 & 3.2.3.1.C) and the Perimeter Yard Indicator is BB (LUC Sections 3.2.3.1.C & 3.2.6.4).

2) This site has been significantly revised, rendering the previous review comments, including the DDO comments, no longer applicable. Two parcels (123-14-0600 & 123-14-0610) have been combined into a single parcel (123-14-061A), thereby doubling the site size to fifteen thousand, five hundred eighty two (15,582) square feet. Two (2) duplex buildings, for a total of four (4) units, with four (4) bedrooms in each unit, have been proposed for this site.

3) Provide continuous pedestrian circulation and access from each building entrance to the adjacent public street (DS 2-08.3.1 & DS 2-01.3.9.R, .T). The pedestrian circulation must be a sidewalk as defined in DS 2-8.4.1. Provide dimensions for the width for the sidewalk on the site plan. The minimum width is four (4) feet (DS 2-08.5.1.A). A crosswalk does not meet the criterion for pedestrian circulation. In addition, a crosswalk behind the parking spaces cannot be approved.

4) OK (LUC Section 3.3.6.8.C).

5) A back-up spur must be provided at the south end of the PAAL (LUC Section 3.3.6.6.D.1). The back-up spur shall be a minimum of three (3) feet in depth and have a three (3) foot radii and a wheel barrier (LUC Section 3.3.6.6.D.2). See Illustration 3.3.6.6.D. Apply for a parking design modification request (PDMR).

6) OK (DS 2-01.2.4).

7) OK (DS 2-01.2.5).

8) OK (DS 2-01.2.6).

9) OK (DS 2-01.2.7).

10) OK (DS 2-01.3.1).

11) OK (DS 2-01.3.2.B).

12) OK (D 2-01.3.8.B).

13) OK (DS 2-01.3.8.C, & DS 2-01.3.9.H.4).

14) Identify the parking dimensions as typical (DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a).

15) Provide a minimum of two (2) short-term and two (2) long-term bicycle parking spaces on site (LUC Section 3.3.8). Show bicycle parking facilities fully dimensioned (DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d). See bicycle parking design criteria (LUC Section 3.3.9). Provide a fully dimensioned detail for the short-term bicycle parking and a note stating that the long-term bicycle parking in provided within each unit.

16) OK (DS 2-01.3.9.V).

17) OK. No signage provided (DS 2-01.3.9.W).

Please be aware that additional comments may be necessary relative to information provided with subsequent submittals.
08/22/2012 CAGUILA1 PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Needs Review
08/22/2012 CAGUILA1 LANDSCAPE REVIEW Needs Review