Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - DP12-0001
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/12/2012 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 01/27/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. The required screen along a street frontage for vehicular use and outdoor display areas may be lowered to thirty (30) inches if the site is located: a. Across the street from nonresidential uses or unimproved, nonresidentially zoned parcels. 2. A 5' continuous screen along street frontages for vehicle use area must be provided per LUC Table 3.7.2-I. 3. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 4. Additional comments may apply. |
| 01/30/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/02/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the size of the water meter b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned) d. the size of the public sanitary sewer e. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes f. the first floor elevation for each building Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006. |
| 02/09/2012 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: DP12-0001 (T12CM00034) 774 East Seneca Street Duplex (2units w/ 4 bedrooms in each unit) TRANSMITTAL: February 10, 2012 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1) This site is located in the R-2 zone (LUC Section 2.3.5.2.A.2). The Development Designator is "K" (LUC Sections 2.3.5.2.A.2 & 3.2.3.1.C) and the Perimeter Yard Indicator is BB (LUC Sections 3.2.3.1.C & 3.2.6.4). 2) Identify the surface for the vehicle use area. See LUC Section 3.3.6.9.A for surface requirements. 3) Provide six (6) inch curbing around the vehicle use areas (LUC Section 3.3.6.8.A). 4) Provide a wheel stop for the front parking space along Seneca Street. The wheel stop must be two and a half (2 ½) feet from the front of the parking space (LUC Section 3.3.6.8.C). (See Illustration 3.3.6.8.C.) 5) The back-up spur shall be a minimum of three (3) feet in depth and have a three (3) foot radii and a wheel barrier (LUC Section 3.3.6.6.D.2). A minimum distance of three (3) feet shall be provided between the back of the spur and the screen wall, in the north vehicle use area, and the building in the south vehicle use area (LUC Section 3.3.6.6.D.3). (See Illustration 3.3.6.6.D.) COMMENTS: the following comments are relative to an application for a Design Development Option (DDO). 6) The minimum setback to the front property line is the greater of twenty (20) feet or one and one-half (1 ½) the height of the structure's wall facing the front property line (LUC Section 3.2.6.5.A). The height of the structure's wall facing the north (front) property, measured from design grade (ground level) is eighteen (18) feet. The minimum required setback is twenty-seven (27) feet. The proposed front setback is twenty-four (24) feet. 7) The minimum setback to both the east and west property lines is the greater of ten (10) feet or three-quarters (3/4) the height of the structure's wall, measured for design grade to the highest point (LUC Section 3.2.6.4 & Illustration 3.2.6.3). The height of the east and west walls of both units do not exceed thirteen (13) feet, four (4) inches. The required minimum setback for both units is ten (10) feet on each side. The proposed setback, to both the east and west (side yards) property lines, is five (5) feet. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06/25/2012 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |