Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - DP11-0018
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/03/2012 | ZELIN CANCHOLA | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 12/14/2011 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 12/14/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP11-0018 Aloft Hotel - Travelers Accommodation and Lodging Use Development Package (no rezoning involved) TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 14, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. DS 2-01.3.3 and DS 2-01.3.7.A.6.a - Relevant case numbers shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. Due to changes to the wall height along the north and west sides of the building and a loss of parking spaces due to the re-design of the surface parking lot on the east side a variance will be required for the setbacks and parking. List the B. of A. case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. The case number, date of approval and conditions of approval are to be listed as a note on sheet one. 2. DS 2-01.3.7.A.6.b - include the MS&R LUC section number 2.8.3 in note four (4) under the General Notes on sheet one (1). (It is acknowledged that the existing building does not meet the MS&R setback requirements.) 3. DS 2-01.3.7.C.2 - The following note is to be added to sheet one under the general notes: "No structure or vegetation shall be located or maintained so as to interfere with the sight visibility triangles in accordance with development standards 3-01.0" 4. DS 2-01.3.8.C - It appears that the full mid-block right of way of 120 feet (total) exists for both Campbell and Speedway, both theses streets are considered major streets and are subject to the intersection widening. Per the adopted Major Streets and Routes plan the potential for additional right of way up 150 feet total is possible. The additional right of way could be required in the future and would affect the setbacks of the building. The MS&R building setbacks must be labeled based on the future back of curb location, which includes the intersection widening if applicable. If applicable, the future widening must be depicted on all affected plan sheets. While the MS&R requirements are a COT Transportation review purview, it has been mentioned by zoning for confirmation from Transportation as to the requirements for this intersection. If the overall right of way has been acquired the existing or future curb as noted on the plan is correct if not then the plan must be depicted with the correct location of the future curb. 5. DS 2-01.3.9.A - It is requested that a Parcel Tax Combo be done in order to combine the three parcels that make up the overall site. The Parcel combo is processed through the Pima County Assessor's office. Once the tax parcel combo document has been signed by the Assessor's office, the customer will be provided with the document that must be provided to PDSD Zoning for confirmation of the Parcel combo. 6. DS 2-01.3.9.F - Clearly delineate the C-3 zoning boundary. The C-3 boundary only encompasses the two (2) corner parcels. 7. DS 2-01.3.9.H.2 - Where and if applicable, future sight visibility triangles must be shown based on the future intersection widening per the adopted MS&R Plan. 8. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.b - Per the plan and notes additional required parking is to be provided through a parking agreement from the developments across the alley. Per the plan, it appears that a total of 44 parking spaces are to be leased from the adjacent developments. The overall parking requirement is for 175 parking spaces, but only 161 spaces will be provided. A Board of adjustment variance approval (See LUC sec. 3.3.4.2 vehicle parking table, "Travelers Accommodation" use for number of spaces required) will be required in order to reduce the number of parking spaces by 14. In addition, plans must be submitted for the developments that will be leasing the parking spaces. Parking spaces that are to be leased must be excess spaces and not required by the developments leasing the vehicle parking spaces. The use type and number of parking spaces required for the said uses south of the alley must be included on the additional plans in order to verify parking compliance for these developments. A copy or copies of the City of Tucson's required executed parking lease agreements must be included with the additional plans. 9. DS 2-01.3.9.M - Zoning has reviewed the grading plan to ensure compliance with the site plan. As of this review the grading plan and the site plan are denied. Once the site has been approved and the grading plan has been revised to match the site plan and assure compliance with the approved site plan, the grading plan is also approved. If changes or revisions are made to either the site or grading plans after the zoning approval, zoning reserves the right to re-review both plans for compliance. 10. DS 2-01.3.9.O - Per the plan the street perimeter building setbacks along the Speedway Blvd. and Campbell Ave. street frontages are labeled as 51.7' and 46' from the building to the back of existing/future curb locations respectively. The existing street perimeter building setbacks are considered non-conforming due to previous code requirements and right of way acquisition that has occurred over the years. As a result the existing street perimeter building setbacks do not comply with the current LUC required setbacks. Due to a proposed raising of the roof structure along the northwest portion of the building, which is creating an overall building of 82 feet, approval of the height must be approved through a Board of Adjustment variance. In addition, the wall height will also affect the required street perimeter building setback. The existing non-conforming street perimeter building setbacks will be lost due to the overall height of the new wall height. The current street perimeter building setback is based on the greatest of 21 feet or the height of the wall height adjacent to the street perimeter. In this case the overall height is listed on the plan as 82'. A variance for 30.3' street perimeter building setback along the Speedway Blvd. and 36' along the Campbell Ave. will be required. (See LUC section 3.2.6.5.B, developing area setbacks and LUC section 2.8.3.6 MS&R Street Building Setback) 11. DS 2-01.3.9.R - For clarity, label the overall width of all on site pedestrian sidewalks on sheet 4. Keynote five (5) on sheet 4 and 5 should be revised to include the 2.5-foot overhang. 12. DS 2-01.3.9.V - Add a note that states that the mail is delivered within the building or if an exterior mailbox is used draw and label the location. 13. DS 2-01.3.9.W - Label the type and size of all signs including existing and proposed. 14. Additional observations. a. This project has been assigned the development package case number DP11-0018. List the case number in the lower right corner of all plan sheets. b. Remove the T11BU number. When a plan is submitted under the development package and the grading plan is part of the package, a BU number will not be assigned. c. Clarify if the existing building labeled as Conference center is part of this development. If so, the plan must be revised as well as all relevant calculations in order to verify that the site complies with all required LUC development criteria and development standards. If the building is not part of the Hotel, label as "not part of this project". (It is clear however that leased parking from this development is proposed.) d. Dimension the PAAL areas in the northeast area of the site and include direction of travel for the east-west PAAL. Also dimension the width of all the driveway entrances. Clarify if vehicle access is allowed along the northwest corner of the site, around the sign area. Show direction of vehicle travel. See redlines on sheet 4. 15. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the revision to the plans and responses to zoning comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised site plan and additional requested documents |
| 12/14/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/16/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Ensure that all Zoning & Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior NPP / Landscape approval stamp. 2. The site plan and landscape plan must show identical site layout to avoid conflict between the two plans. Ensure that all changes to the site plan are reflected on the landscape plan. 3. If necessary include with re-submittal approval documentation. Indicate on the lower right hand corner of the site plan, the variance case number, date of approval, and any conditions imposed. 4. Additional comments may apply |
| 12/19/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Revise the site drawing to include the following information: a. the location and size of the water meter and backflow preventer b. the location of the main water lines and fire hydrants c. the location of the gas meter (if one exists or is planned) d. the location and size of the public sanitary sewer e. the location of the building connection to the public sewer f. the location, invert, and rim elevation of the upstream and downstream manholes Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D and Section 103.2.3, UPC 2006 |
| 12/21/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/22/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET 4 OF 13 1. At the passenger loading zone please provide an accessible loading as required by 2006 IBC, Section 1106.7 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 503. 2. Please provide a detectable warning strip at the most Northerly end of the marked crossing. 3. Zoning may require a pedestrian access to both Campbell and Norris Street right of ways. Please reference Zoning comments. If so, please make the pedestrian ways accessible. SHEET 7 OF 13 4. Detail H: Please show slope compliance with ANSI 117.1, Section 502.3. END OF REVIEW |
| 12/23/2011 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Rick Eng. Co., Attn.: Dan Castro DATE: Dec. 27, 2011 3945 E. Fort Lowell Rd., Ste. 111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: Aloft Renovation, 1900 E. Speedway Blvd. Site plan DP11-0018 (First Review) T14S, R14E, Section 08 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Site Plan/Grading plan. The Site Plan (SP) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Include the Drainage Statement (DS) with the re-submittal. Site Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the SP. 2. Label existing and future sight visibility triangles per D.S. 2-02.2.1.10. SVT's shall be shown for the intersection also, not just the driveways. 3. Show all points of egress and ingress including locations and width of driveways and parking area access lanes (P.A.A.L.) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.11. Limit all proposed ingress/egress points to property no closer than 200' of intersection centerline for arterial streets. 4. Fully dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. It appears that the refuse service will enter Campbell Ave. when backing up to exit the enclosure, this is not allowed. Also by looking at the aerials, the existing refuse containers/enclosures of the surrounding properties are being serviced from "East to West". Perhaps rotating the enclosure 180 degrees would satisfy this requirement. Please address. 5. Please show dimensioned right-of-way, including any applicable Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Plan right-of-way per D.S. 2-02.2.1.19. 6. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 7. Show Development plan number (DP11-0018) on all sheets per D.S. 2-02.2.1.29. Remove the "T11BU" portion in the title block. The grading plan is now under the "DP" number and does not have a grading plan number assigned to it. 8. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. Usually off-site construction is not allowed. Provide documentation from Permits and Codes allowing any off-site/right-of-way construction. 9. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers and/or sidewalk scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof drain/sidewalk scupper locations have been designed and located and that the 10-year flow must be conveyed under any other sidewalks and/or pedestrian paths will suffice. Provide a detail of the proposed trench drain. See "green lines" on the plan. Drainage Statement: 1. The DS has been accepted by engineering. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4932 or Paul.Machado@tucsonaz.gov Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson - Planning and Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 837-4932 office (520) 879-8010 fax C:/1900 E. Speedway Blvd. DP-Site |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2012 | CINDY AGUILAR | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |