Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Review Detail

Permit Number: DP11-0017
Parcel: 10409002D

Address:
4329 N ORACLE RD

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: SITE

Permit Number - DP11-0017
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/09/2012 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Buffalo Wild Wings @ Wetmore Plaza
Development Package (1st Review)
DP11-0017

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 9, 2012

DUE DATE: January 20, 2012

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is December 08, 2012

2. D.S. 2-01.3.1 The name, mailing and email addresses, and phone number of the primary property owner of the site, the developer of the project, registrant(s), and other person(s), firm(s), or organization(s) that prepared the development package documents shall be provided on the right half of the cover sheet. That said provide the owners information as required above.

3. D.S. 2-01.3.2 The title block shall include the following information.
D.S. 2-01.3.2.B A brief legal description
D.S. 2-01.3.2.D The administrative street address.
D.S. 2-01.3.2.E Page number and number of pages.

1. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the Development Package Number, DP11-0017, in the lower right hand corner of the sheet, adjacent to the title block.

2. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Provide as a general note the existing and proposed use as listed in the LUC, i.e. EXISTING USE FOOD SERVICE, PROPOSED USE FOOD SERVICE "33", SUBJECT TO: SEC. 3.5.4.6.C

3. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.7 Provide the Annexation case number C9-82-48, in the lower right hand corner of the sheet, adjacent to the title block.

4. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.a There appears to be a discrepancy in the total floor area listed under the "PARKING" and "EXPANSION CALCULATION". Under the "PARKING" the "PROPOSED" lists "1 P.S. PER 200 S.F. GROSS AREA = 77,289, under the "EXPANSION CALCULATION" the "PROPOSED BUILDING" is listed as "77,479 SF", clarify.

5. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b The Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculation is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.2.3.2.B, Development Designator 33 the allowed FAR is 1.50.

6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined.

7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 Per the 2010 Pictometry Photos there is a wall located west of the proposed western most Parking Area Access Lane (PAAL). Per LUC Section 3.3.6.6.B.2 Access lanes and PAALs shall be setback at least two (2) feet from a wall, screen, or other obstruction. That said if this wall is to remain provide the two (2) foot setback on the plan.

8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5 There are numerous PAAL dimension strings that do not line up with the parking striping or sidewalks. Until the dimension strings are shown correctly required PAAL widths cannot be verified.

9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a As vehicle parking is changing provide a detail for a standard vehicle parking space.

10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The "CONC. WHEELSTOP" detail, Sheet CG-1, does not show the correct location for the wheel stop. See LUC Section 3.3.6.8.C for the correct location.

11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Depending on how comment 18 is addressed wheel stop curbing may be required for the five (5) vehicle parking spaces shown along the west side of the proposed building.

12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a As the provided "HANDICAPPED PARKING" detail does not match what is proposed on sheet CS-3 either provide a detail that matches what is proposed or fully dimension the layout shown on sheet CS-3.

13. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.c The loading space calculation appears to have a typo. The loading space dimension should be 12' x 35'

14. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The bicycle parking calculation is not correct. Based on 8,600 SF/2000 the required Short-Term for the Food Service is 4.3 or 4 spaces required.

15. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The proposed "Ribbon" style Short-Term Bicycle rack is not an acceptable rack. Revise you detail to show an acceptable rack. The bicycle parking detail should also address LUC Sections 3.3.9.2 & 3.3.9.3.

16. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O The building street perimeter yard setback shown under "SETBACKS" is not correct. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.5.B, ADT of 1,000 or greater, the required east street perimeter yard setback is twenty-one (21) feet, or the height of the proposed exterior building wall, which ever is greatest, measured from the back of future curb. Show the future curb for Oracle Road on the plan and provide a street perimeter yard setback dimension on the plan. Zoning acknowledges that the proposed building will meet the required setback.

17. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the building height for the proposed buildings within the footprint on the site plan.

18. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Provide sidewalk width dimensions for all new sidewalks shown on the plan.

19. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Per D.S. 2-08.4.1.A provide a sidewalk from the proposed building to the sidewalk located within the right-of-way of Oracle Road.

20. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Per D.S. 2-08.5.1.A The minimum width of a sidewalk is four (4) feet. That said it appears that the sidewalk shown between the southwest corner of the proposed building and the refuse enclosure does not meet this width.

21. D.S. 2-01.3.9.W Indicate what type (monument, pole, wall, etc.) of sign is shown at the southeast corner of the site on Sheet CS-3

22. Provide the "DEVELOPMENT PACKAGE" approval stamp on all sheets. This stamp can be found in "jpg, dwg, pdf" format at http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D
p11-0017

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package.
01/12/2012 RONALD BROWN H/C SITE REVIEW Denied SHEET CS-1
1. At the accessible parking plan detail, show slope compliance with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 502.5.
2. At the accessible parking sign detail, please add a "Van Accessible" sign and indicate the larger sign to be mounted 7'-0" above finished grade.
SHEET CS-2
3. Provide an accessible route to the Oracle Road right of way and to the other buildings West of this site.
a. Include all required marked crossings needed when crossing the PAAL plus all required curb ramps and detectable warnings.
b. Insure the accessible route slopes comply with ICC/ANSI 117.1, Section 403.3.
SHEET SG-1
4. The sidewalk detail shows a 6" high curb. The accessible parking surface is flush with the concrete walkway. Please define on the site plan how this elevation transition is accomplished.
5. Is there a ramp at the walkway to the front entrance to the future retail space of thhis building? If so, please provide a large scale detail showing all accessible requirements.
END OF REVIEW
01/18/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Denied The rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole (2319.59') is less than 12" below the first floor elevation (2319.67'). A backwater valve will be required for each building sewer per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson.
01/20/2012 ANDREW CONNOR LANDSCAPE REVIEW Denied 1. Provide previous landscape plans for reference. If no plans exist then this submittal will become the document of record. Provide the following information if necessary:

" Location, size, and name of existing vegetation to remain in place.

" Both the proper and common name of each type of plant material.

Note: Existing development on the site is subject to the zoning regulations in effect at the time the existing development received zoning approval per LUC 3.7.1.2.B

2. Ensure that all zoning comments and concerns are addressed

3. Additional comments may apply
01/20/2012 ANDREW CONNOR NPPO REVIEW Approved
12/21/2011 MARTIN BROWN FIRE REVIEW Approved
12/21/2011 RBROWN1 ADA REVIEW Passed
12/21/2011 JASON GREEN ENGINEERING REVIEW Denied DATE: December 22, 2011
SUBJECT: Buffalo Wild Wings Development Plan Package- Engineering Review
TO: APEX Development Consultants; Attn: Derek Roberts, PE
LOCATION: 4329 N Oracle Rd, T13S R13E 23 Ward 3
REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM
ACTIVITY: DP11-0017


SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package and Drainage Statement (APEX DevCon, PC, 16DEC11). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Site Plan and Grading Plan. The following items need to be addressed:


SITE PLAN: It is recommended that Development Standard 2-01 "Development Package" be reviewed prior to resubmittal. DS Sec.2-02 and 2-05 no longer exists and all reviews fall under DS Sec.2-01 for Development Package. The standard has changes that must be incorporated into the plan sheets for review and approval.

1) DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan document to include the CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp

2) DS Sec.2-01.3.2.B: Revise the title block on the development plan document to include a brief legal description of the site.

3) DS Sec.2-01.3.2.D: Revise the title block on the development plan document to include the administrative address.

4) DS Sec.2-01.3.2.E: Revise the title block on the development plan document to include the page number and number of pages that are included within the set.

5) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: The relevant Development Plan Package number (DP11-0017) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets.

6) DS Sec.2-01.3.5: Revise the plan set to include a sheet index on the first sheet listing the names of each sheet included in the development plan package.

7) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5: Revise the Concrete Wheel Stop Detail on Sheet CG-1 to correctly show the required 2.5-foot (2' 6") overhang dimension.

8) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5: Revise Section A on Sheet CS-1 to clarify the 12.5' proposed parking area label. Per plan view the 12.5' area appears to be pedestrian access and not parking, clarify.

9) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise the development plan document to include a pedestrian sidewalk from the building to the adjacent street (Oracle Rd) per DS Sec.2-08.4.1.A.

10) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise the development plan document to label all sidewalk widths that are proposed around the building and adjacent to the refuse enclosure. Verify that all sidewalks meet the minimum 4-foot dimension per DS Sec.2-08.5.1.A.

11) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document and the Refuse Enclosure Detail to meet the minimum dimension requirements of DS Sec.6-01. Per the referenced standard only a 2 container enclosure is required. Since this project is proposing 3 containers and the standard does not provide dimensions for that design prior approval from Environmental Services is required. Verify that each container has a clear 10'x10' area plus a 1-foot dimension from the enclosure wall to the required bollards.


GENERAL COMMENTS:

Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments.

Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929.



Jason Green, CFM
Senior Engineer Associate
Engineering Division
Planning & Development Services Department

Final Status

Task End Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description
01/27/2012 GERARDO BONILLA APPROVAL SHELF Completed
01/27/2012 CPIERCE1 OUT TO CUSTOMER Completed
01/27/2012 GERARDO BONILLA REJECT SHELF Completed