Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you cannot find what you are looking for please submit a records request.

Permit Number: DP11-0009
Parcel: 11451137B

Review Status: Completed

Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL

Permit Number - DP11-0009
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
Review Date Reviewer's Name Type of Review Description Status Comments
01/11/2012 CAGUILA1 START PLANS SUBMITTED Approved
01/17/2012 STEVE SHIELDS ZONING REVIEW Denied CDRC TRANSMITTAL

TO: Planning and Development Services Department
Plans Coordination Office

FROM: Steve Shields
Lead Planner

PROJECT: Oasis Church
Development Package (1st Review)
DP11-0009

TRANSMITTAL DATE: January 17, 2012

DUE DATE: January 24, 2012

DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed.

1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 13, 2012

2. This comment was not addressed correctly. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 General Note #3 states "PROPOSED USE OF PROPERTY IS RELIGIOUS USE SUBJECT TO 3.5.3.6". The subject to section is not correct. Per LUC Section 2.5.3.2.C.10 there is no subject to section for Religious Use. Also remove all other use references from the note except "GENERAL MERCHANDISE SALES, C-1, 28 SUBJECT TO 3.5.9.2.C & C-2 SUBJECT TO 3.5.9.2.A

3. This comment was not addressed. Distance and bears should be shown for all lot lines on the entire site. D.S. 2-01.3.9.A Draw in all proposed lot lines with approximate distances and measurements. That said provide the lot line distances on the plan.

4. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The vehicle parking space calculation is not correct. As this project is parked as a shopping center the required vehicle parking space calculation is based on a ratio of 1 space for 200 gfa. That said the calc should be 109,225/200 = 546 required, 824 provided.

If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com

Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D11-0032

RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package.
01/18/2012 RONALD BROWN HC SITE REVIEW Denied 1. Please reswing the gate in the direction of travel.
2. Please add a detectable warning strip on the west end of the marked crossing.
END OF REVIEW
01/18/2012 ROBERT SHERRY PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL REVIEW Approved
01/19/2012 PATRICIA GEHLEN ZONING-DECISION LETTER REVIEW Passed