Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Active
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - DP11-0008
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Active
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/07/2012 | RONALD BROWN | HC SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/23/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/27/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/29/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Skyview Apartments - Renovation Development Package (1st Review) DP11-0008 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 1, 2012 DUE DATE: March 06, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 09, 2012 1. This comment was not fully addressed. The lot coverage calculation should include the allowed lot coverage. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide a lot coverage calculation that meets the requirements of LUC Section 3.2.9. The calculation should be broke out for the square footage for both the R-3 and O-3 zones based on the applicable development designators. It appears that the lot coverage will be exceeded in the R-3 zone. As new construction is proposed in this area a Board of Adjustment for Variance will be required. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b The proposed project is a 1.3 acre parcel with split zoning of R-3 - 0.92 acres and O-3 - 0.41 acres. The following development criteria applies: R-3 LUC Section 2.3.6.2.A.2, Family Dwelling "P", LUC Section 3.2.3.1.D , Residential Development Designator High-Density Matrix. Allowed Lot Coverage is 70%. Proposed Lot Coverage is 85%. A Board of Adjustment for Variance is required to increase the lot cover in the R-3 zone. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Per LUC Section 3.3.4.2 Minimum Number of Motor Vehicle Spaces Required, RESIDENTIAL USE GROUP Multifamily Dwellings - Over 70 units/acre, 1.25 spaces per dwelling unit. Based on 76 units x 1.25 the required number of vehicle parking spaces is 95, proposed number of vehicle parking spaces is 85. A Board of Adjustment for Variance is required to reduce the number of vehicle parking spaces to 85. 4. This comment was not fully addressed 1) Per LUC Section 3.3.9.2.A.5 Outdoor bicycle parking areas must be lighted so that they are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings during hours of use. 2) Per LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.6 Each required short-term bicycle parking space must be at least two (2) feet by six (6) feet. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Per "NEW SITE PLAN KEYNOTE" #8 the bicycle parking is new. That said the bicycle parking is required to meet LUC Section 3.3.9 for Short-term bicycle parking. Provide a detail that shows how the proposed Short-Term bicycle parking meets the requirements of LUC 3.3.9.2.B. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Per the "CALCULATIONS: BIKE PARKING (3.3.9) LONG TERM BIKE PARKING PROVIDED 24 OUTDOOR + 76 INSIDE RESIDENTIAL UNITS = 100". Show the 24 outdoor Long-Term bicycle parking spaces on the site plan and provide a detail that shows how the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.4 are met.. 6. This comment was not addressed. Provide a dimension from the proposed building addition to the north street property line. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O It does not appear that the proposed expansion meets setback to the street. Provide a dimension on the site plan/detail. A Design Development Option (DDO) may be required. If a Board of Adjustment for Variance is applied for the vehicle parking the setback can be included in the variance process. 7. As comment 6 above was not addressed the following Board of Adjustment for Variance comment may not be totally accurate. Per LUC Section 3.2.6.5.A Within established areas, the front street perimeter yard is twenty (20) feet or one and one-half (1 1/2) the height of the proposed wall (H), measured from the street property line, whichever is greater, up to a maximum of ninety (90) feet. Where a lot abuts more than one (1) street, the owner shall choose which street lot line is the front lot line. From other than the front lot line, the street perimeter yard is ten (10) feet. Based on an existing building height of 36' the required front street perimeter yard setback would be 54', neither Fremont Avenue or Park Avenue perimeter yard setback qualify as a front street. That said based on the proposed building height of 19'-8" the required front street perimeter setback along 8th Street is 29'-6", proposed is approximately 1'-0". A Board of Adjustment for Variance is required to reduce the required front street perimeter yard from 29'-6" to 1'-0". 8. If the Board of Adjustment for Variance is approved provide the following information on the site plan; Board of Adjustment for Variance Number, Date of Approval, What was varied or approved, and any Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP11-0008 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07/02/2012 | ANY | REJECT SHELF | RECEIVED |