Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: SITE
Permit Number - DP11-0008
Review Name: SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/15/2011 | RBROWN1 | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 11/16/2011 | DAVE MANN | FIRE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 11/21/2011 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Denied | Provide the rim elevation of the next upstream sanitary manhole. Determine the need for a backwater valve per Section 710.1, UPC 2006, as amended by the City of Tucson. Reference: City of Tucson Development Standard No. 2-01.0.0, Section 3.8 D. |
| 11/21/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET 2 1. Change note 7 to Read: "All site accessibe requirements shall be as per the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition. This includes all accessible routes, marked crossings as required, accessible parking, curb and sidewlak ramps, detetctable warnings as required and front entrance requirements. 2. For a total of 85 parking spaces, the 2006 IBC, Table 1106.1 requires 4 accessible parkings spaces. You are two shy, please add two more. a. 1 of every six accessible parkings spaces must be "Van Accessible". Please make one of the four accessible spaces required, "Van Accessible". SHEET 3 3. At note 5, please change to read "the 2006 IBC, Chapter 11 and ICC/ANSI 117.1, 2003 Edition. 4. Please reference the accessible parking spaces to the large scale plan shown on sheet 5. SHEET 5 5. At detail E: a. Show a "Van Accessible space as per section 502.2. b. Show parking slopes in compliance with Section 402.5. c. Provide a large scale sign detail with the "Van Accessible" sign. d. Show how access is acheived from the accessible parking aisle to the accessible route. END OF REVIEW |
| 11/30/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Skyview Apartments - Renovation Development Package (1st Review) DP11-0008 TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 01, 2011 DUE DATE: December 14, 2011 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 09, 2012 1. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the Development Package Number, DP11-0008, adjacent to the title block. 2. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.4 Revise General And Site Note 4 to show a use as listed in the LUC. The existing and proposed use should be listed as R-3 Family Dwelling "P" & O-3 Family Dwelling "L". 3. D.S. 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide a lot coverage calculation that meets the requirements of LUC Section 3.2.9. The calculation should be broke out for the square footage for both the R-3 and O-3 zones based on the applicable development designators. It appears that the lot coverage will be exceeded in the R-3 zone. As new construction is proposed in this area a Board of Adjustment for Variance will be required. 4. D.S. 2-01.3.9.c Provide a building area expansion calculation on the plan. Please clarify what "LOT AREA" is being expanded. 5. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Clarify what vehicle parking ratio or bedrooms count was used for the required vehicle parking number. 6. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a Based on the provided last approved site plan there were ninety-nine (99) vehicle parking spaces provided. The new parking calculation shows eighty-five (85) provided. That said a Board of Adjustment for Variance will be required to reduce the vehicle parking. 7. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.a As restriping of the vehicle parking is proposed provide a detail for the standard vehicle parking space. 8. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Clarify what the bicycle parking calculation was based on. 9. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Per "NEW SITE PLAN KEYNOTE" #8 the bicycle parking is new. That said the bicycle parking is required to meet LUC Section 3.3.9 for Short-term bicycle parking. Provide a detail that shows how the proposed Short-Term bicycle parking meets the requirements of LUC 3.3.9.2.B. 10. D.S. 2-01.3.9.O It does not appear that the proposed expansion meets setback to the street. Provide a dimension on the site plan/detail. A Design Development Option (DDO) may be required. If a Board of Adjustment for Variance is applied for the vehicle parking the setback can be included in the variance process, see comment 6 above. 11. D.S. 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the building height for the proposed expansion within the building footprint on the site plan. 12. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Demonstrate how the proposed accessible vehicle parking spaces provide access to the existing sidewalk. 13. There appears to be worked proposed in the right-of-way along 8th Street. Provide documentation from COT Transportation Department that allows this work to be done. A Temporary Revocable Easement (TRE) may be required prior to approval of this plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D11-0032 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. |
| 12/09/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/12/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | NPPO | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/12/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Provide approval documentation from City of Tucson Transportation Department for landscape improvements proposed within right-of-way along 8th St. Contact Gary.Wittwer@tucsonaz.gov for review and approval of landscape within COT ROW. Note: Other improvements may require a Temporary Revocable Easement (TRE). 2. Ensure that all Zoning comments and concerns are addressed. 3. Additional comments may apply. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 02/03/2012 | CPIERCE1 | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 02/03/2012 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |