Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Permit Number - DP11-0003
Review Name: DEV PKG - RESUBMITTAL
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/13/2012 | CAGUILA1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/13/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 03/01/2012 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 03/01/2012, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Quick Trip #1461 DP11-0003, T14S, R14E, SECTION 22 RECEIVED: Development Package and Drainage Report on February 13, 2012 The subject project has been reviewed. The Drainage Report is acceptable and it is hereby approved. The Development package still has some missing information. It shall be approved once the remaining information is provided. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that where made and references the exact location in the development plan package where the revisions were made: BASE LAYER SHEET COMMENTS: 1. Provide the lot split recording information. 2. Provide the required construction, utilities, drainage and access easements recording information as required by D.S. 2-01.3.9.L. SWPPP: 1. Include a copy of the completed (signed by the owner) NOI form that was submitted to ADEQ (Part III.D.3). Provide some blank forms for the unknown operators. (Part IV.F) Each operator is responsible for submitting a completed NOI to ADEQ and to the City of Tucson. Please note that the remaining signatures from the operators must be on the onsite copy of the SWPPP at or before commencement of construction. 2. Include a copy of the authorization certificate received from ADEQ (Part III.D.2). 3. Include a dated and signed certification form for each known operator (including the owner) in accordance with Part VII.K. (Part IV.J.1). 4. Working outside the parcel lines requires permission from adjacent property owners and easements. If permission is not granted, revise the clearing and grading limits. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan Package |
| 03/06/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Quick Trip Store 1461 Development Package (2nd Review) DP11-0003 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 7, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development package. If, at the end of that time, the development package has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is November 02, 2012 The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0 1. This comment has not been fully addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.3 Provide the Lot Split number S??-??? adjacent to the title block. 2. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E There appears to be some type of lot split proposed for this project. Provide the appropriate documents to Planning and Development Services for approval prior to approval of the development package. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.9.L Provide the recordation information, Sequence Number, for the proposed "INGRESS/EGRESS PEDESTRIAN, DRAINAGE AND LIGHTING EASEMENT" on the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ DP11-0003 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Quick Trip Store 1461 Development Package (2nd Review) T10BU01903 TRANSMITTAL DATE: March 7, 2012 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development package has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 03/13/2012 | KBROUIL1 | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 03/14/2012 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET C100 1. In reference to comment 2 response: a. ICC A117.1, Sections 406.12, 13 and 14, marked crossing shall be preceeded by a dectectable warning strips as wide as the crossing and complying with section 705 which states that they are to be truncated domes. b. Your stamped paver pattern is not an approved detectable warning as it is not truncated domes as specified in section 705. Furthermore, your stamped paver pattern is a continous strip around the building and not specifically a detectable warning strip for the marked crossing as required. SHEET C511 2. At detail L1, please add the detectable warning strip as indicated in your review comment 2 response. END OF REVIEW |
| 03/14/2012 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | Approved, subject to compliance with the following conditions: 1) Include all of the proposed landscaping in the Rainwater Harvesting Plan to establish the correct plant water demand for the site. DS 10-03.4.2.B. Include revised calcs. for the the Alvernon Rd. border and the off-property basin and clarify the location of subwatershed 5A. 2) Revise the landscape plan calculation for the length of the Alvernon Rd. landscape border and adjust the tree requirement if necessary. LUC 3.7.2.4 |
| 03/14/2012 | ROBERT SHERRY | PLUMBING-COMMERCIAL | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 03/21/2012 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved |