Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Permit Number - DP11-0002
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - SITE
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/04/2012 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Ensure that all Zoning & Engineering comments and concerns are addressed prior NPP / Landscape approval stamp. |
| 01/06/2012 | CPIERCE1 | HC SITE | REVIEW | Needs Review | 1. On sheet 4 please fix all detail reference key notes. Should be sheet 5 instead of sheet 3. 2. Remove the detectable warning strips at the end of both accessibkle route ramps and provide one at the top of the accessible parking aisle that is connected to the marked crossing to Drexel Street. END OF REVIEW |
| 12/28/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: DP11-0002 1150 W Drexel Road C3 Connect at Calle Santa Cruz TRANSMITTAL DATE: December 28, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit two rolled copies of the revised drawings along with redline copies and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Zoning has reviewed the revised plan sheets and acknowledges that all zoning comments have been addressed. As per a discussion with Michael Schooler on December 28th, 2011, Michael was informed that zoning had reviewed the revised plans sheets and that zoning was satisfied with the revisions made to the plans. However the PDSD plans reviewer signature stamp was changed on the new set which is no longer used by PDSD. Zoning is requiring that prior to final approval of the development package, that the new plan reviewer signature stamp be added to all the plan sheets in the development package. Zoning will sign off on the plans on the next submittal or over the counter if all plans reviewers approve the Development Package. Signatures from all Planners will be required on the new plan sheets. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. |
| 12/29/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: December 29, 2011 SUBJECT: C3Connect Development Plan Package- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Metro TED Attn: Lisa Bowers LOCATION: 1150 W Drexel Road, T15S R13E 02 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: DP11-0002 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Statement (Cypress Civil Development, 21OCT11) and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Cypress Civil Development, 04NOV11). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Site Plan, Grading Plan and SWPPP review. The following items need to be addressed: SITE PLAN: 1) New: DS Sec.2-01.2.5: Revise the development plan documents to include the CDRC approval stamp in the lower right quadrant of each sheet. The link to the stamp can be found here: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/cdrc-rezoning/cdrd-stamp 2) New: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M: Revise the plan set, specifically Sheet 4 and all Keynotes that reference Detail _ on Sheet 3. With the new format submitted the new sheet reference should state Detail _ on Sheet 5 and/or 6 (which ever is applicable). 3) New: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.1: Revise the plan set, specifically Keynote #11 on Sheet 4 to reference the required 8-inch depression for the proposed water harvesting areas per the Drainage Statement requirements for retention volume. 4) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.R: Revise the plan set to clearly label the minimum 4-foot clear sidewalk widths for all sidewalks adjacent to the existing building. Per DS Sec.2-08.5.1.A all sidewalks must provide a minimum 4-foot clear width. Label this width in plan view on Sheets 2, 4 and 6 along with all associated Details. Sheet 2 calls out the 4-foot dimension however it appears from plan view and Detail 3/Sh 6 that the handicap signs encroach within this area, clarify. Also on Sheet 4 the sidewalk along the north side of the building is still labeled as 3.5-feet which does not meet the minimum 4-foot dimension, revise the plan view and Detail 1/Sh 6 to clearly label the 4-foot minimum dimension. SWPPP: The proposed SWPPP meets the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. For expedite purposes the Development Plan Package can be reviewed over the counter (PDSD Engineering Division comment only) for stamp approval once all items have been addressed. Please call to schedule an appointment when ready. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |