Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D99-0042
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/15/2004 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/16/2004 | JIM EGAN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | The Development Plan is approved April 16, 2004. |
| 04/21/2004 | KAY MARKS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | 201 N. STONE AV., 1ST FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 KAY MARKS ADDRESSING OFFICIAL PH: 740-6480 FAX #: 740-6370 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: KAY MARKS, ADDRESSING OFFICIAL SUBJECT: D99-0042 DESERT CHRISTIAN HIGH SC/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: April 19, 2004 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Add suffix to Rosewood and Finance Center on Location Plan. Correct Gateway Center to Gateway Circle on Location Plan. Spell out suffix for Speedway and Prudence on all sheets. Delete Address and direction from Speedway Boulevard (street location south of project). jg |
| 04/27/2004 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department FROM: Patricia Gehlen Plans Coordination Office Principal Planner PROJECT: Desert Christian High School D99-042 Development Plan TRANSMITTAL: April 27, 2004 DUE DATE: April 27, 2004 COMMENTS CODE SECTION/ DEVELOPMENT STANDARD 1. Please dimension the five (5) most western drop off zones. The original development plan shows four (4) and this plan shows five (5). 2. The pedestrian circulation system must continue along the east side of both future building #9 and #10. 3. The size of the lot is not the same in the lot coverage calculation and the FAR calculation. Revise one or the other for consistency. 4. The Land Use Notes indicate a total of six (6) handi-cap spaces provided on site yet the development plan shows nine (9). Revise one or the other for consistency. 5. Please call out the loading zones on the revised plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Patricia Gehlen, (520) 791-5608. |
| 04/28/2004 | PAUL MACHADO | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | To: Craig Gross DATE: April 28, 2004 Planning Administrator SUBJECT: 7525 E. Speedway Blvd., Desert Christian HS. Development Plan D99-0042 (First Review) T14S, R15E, Section 05 RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Development Plan and Drainage Report. The Development Plan (DP) and Drainage Report (DR) cannot be approved as submitted. Please address the following review comments prior to the next submittal. Development Plan: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DP. 2. If applicable, sidewalks will be required along Prudence Rd. per D.S. 3-01.3.3.A. 3. Fully-dimensioned loading space(s) and maneuvering area(s) per D.S. 2-02.2.1.14. 4. Please provide Drainage patterns and finished grades per D.S. 2-02.2.1.16. 5. Please list estimated cut & fill quantities per D.S. 2-02.2.1.17. 6. Dimension from street monument lines to existing and proposed curbs, sidewalks, driveways, and utility lines per D.S. 2-02.2.1.21. 7. Please provide existing topographic contours at intervals not exceeding two (2) feet and/or spot elevations as pertinent and Bench Mark based on City of Tucson Datum, including City Field Book and page number per D.S. 2-02.2.1.23. 8. Show refuse container location, size, and access thereto fully dimensioned per D.S. 2-02.2.1.32 and D.S. 6-01.0. 9. A permit or a private improvement agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 10. Please show a typical cross section of the P.A.A.L. or call out the percentage of slopes. Call out the GB at the D/W, if applicable. 11. Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. 12. Add note: "Depress all landscaped areas 6" maximum for water harvesting". 13. Please list the area of disturbance. A Grading and Stormwater pollution prevention plan is required. Contact Paul P. Machado at 791-5550 x1193 for additional information. Drainage Report addendum: 1. Please include a response letter to the comments along with the corrected copies of the DR. 2. Please include a statement in the DR addendum indicating that you have reviewed and agree to the data in the original DR by McCarty Engineering, Inc. Please refer to the previous DR by a job number and date, if possible. 3. Please include the following in the DR addendum: Please show the proposed roof drainage patterns, 100% of the 10-year flow must be conveyed under the sidewalks including any other site drainage as well. Please provide supporting calculations to demonstrate compliance with D.S. 3-01.4.4. If the location(s) of the roof scuppers have not yet been decided, a general note indicating sidewalk scuppers will be used when the roof scuppers locations have been designed and located will suffice. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 791-5550 x1193 or Paul.Machado@ci.tucsonaz.govs Paul P. Machado Senior Engineering Associate City of Tucson/Development Services Department 201 N. Stone Avenue P.O. Box 27210 Tucson, Arizona 85726-7210 (520) 791-5550 x1193 office (520) 879-8010 fax |
| 04/29/2004 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Include the previous landscape plan with the submittal. 2) Reference the CDRC Case number in the lower right corner of the landscape plan. 3) Revise the plan to provide the required screening along the north property line entirely on site, unless the proposed landscape easement is obtained. If the easement is acquired add the docket and page to the site and landscape plans. |
| 05/07/2004 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | May 7, 2004 TO: Philip Carhuff, Krebs Carhuff Architects, Inc. THRU: FROM: ____________________________________ representing the Pima County Departments of Wastewater Management and Environmental Quality SUBJECT: Desert Christian High School - Submittal D99-0042A The proposed sewer collection lines to serve the above-referenced project have been reviewed on behalf of the Pima County Department of Environmental Quality (PDEQ) and the Pima County Wastewater Management Department (PCWMD). This review letter may contain comments pertaining to the concerns of either Department. The following comments are offered for your use: This project will be tributary to the Ina Road WPCF via the Pantano Interceptor. Provide a letter from PCWWM Planning Services, written within the past 90 days, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for this project is available. Contact Robert Decker, PCWWM Planning Services, at (520) 740-6625 regarding this matter. Based on our evaluation, this project would qualify for Participating sewer connection fee rates. ALL SHEETS. Add the project number, D99-042A, to the title block of each sheet. This number should be shown larger or bolder than any cross-reference numbers. SHEET 1. Add project reference numbers D99-042 and C9-99-06 to the title block. SHEET 1. Add the following general note “ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF PLUMBING OR BUILDING PLANS.” SHEET 1. Add the following general note “ANY RELOCATION, MODIFICATION, ETC., OF THE EXISTING UTILITIES AND/OR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL BE AT NO EXPENSE TO THE PUBLIC.” SHEET 1. Add the following general note “ANY WASTEWATER DISCHARGED INTO THE PUBLIC SANITARY SEWERAGE SYSTEM SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE INDUSTRIAL WASTE ORGINANCE (PIMA COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 1991-140, AS AMENDED).” SHEET 1. Add the following permitting note “A PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PERMIT MUST BE SECURED FROM PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT BEFORE BEGINNING ANY WORK ON THIS PROJECT.” SHEET 1. Indicate the number of wastewater fixture unit equivalents. SHEET 1. Show the proposed sewers, indicating size, length and slope. SHEET 1. Add a symbol to the legend defining the line type used to show the proposed sewers. SHEET 1. Show the existing sewers, their size and Pima County plan number. SHEET 1. Add a symbol to the legend defining the line type used to show the existing sewers. This line type shall be different to the line type use for the proposed sewers. We will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. County Ordinance 2003-29 went into effect on April 11, 2003. This ordinance requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second (2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. If you wish to discuss the above comments, please contact me at the phone number provided on the first sheet. Copy: Project |