Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D11-0035
Review Name: REVISION - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09/16/2013 | GBONILL1 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 09/17/2013 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D11-0035 1000 E 22nd Street The Retreat - As Builds Review TRANSMITTAL DATE: September 17, 2013 DUE DATE: September 27, 2013 COMMENTS: 01. Zoning requests a letter that details all the changes made and specifically the changes related to zoning review=requirements such as bicycle parking, calculations pedestrian access etc. 02. Provide a detailed drawing of the relocated bicycle parking facilities, dimensions and surfacing materials etc. 03. IF the pedestrian sidewalks have been modified because of the relocation of ADA parking spaces indicate of the access ramps where the ADA spaces have been relocated to have been provided and explain what has been done with the other access ramps. Have the ramps been removed and sidewalk reconstructed etc. 04. Zoning will review the revisions drawing on the next submittal along with the requested letter detailing all the changes made. Additional comments may be forthcoming. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised Site Plan and Requested document |
| 09/19/2013 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Reqs Change | DATE: September 18, 2013 SUBJECT: The Retreat Revised Development/Grading Plan- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 1000 E 22nd Street, T14S R14E Sec19 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D11-0035 & T11BU01331 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised (or As-built) Development/Grading Plan Package. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development/Grading Plan Package at this time. The following items need to be addressed prior to approval: DEVELOPMENT/GRADING PLAN: 1) PDSD Policy # 2008-04 (I) Rev.9gm: A revised development/grading plan was submitted to PDSD for review of as-built changes; however the required revision letter from the engineer of record was not provided with the submittal detailing the changes, revision, removal or relocation of the items to be reviewed. Per the referenced policy a 2nd Tier Revision requires the submittal of a revised base plan and grading plan and the changes must be documented in a revision letter from the Engineer of Record describing the revisions. Provide such letter on next submittal. 2) PDSD Policy # 2008-04 (I) Rev.9gm: The development plan and all associated sheets with changes must be accurately revised to reflect as-built conditions. The plan sheets must be revised to reflect the removal of the concrete valley gutters within the PAAL, relocated bicycle parking, relocation of the handicap parking spaces, revised concrete channel along with spot elevations and other changes (addition of bumper blocks, removal or relocated cover parking, addition of rock rip rap, etc). Simply marking these items out with a black pen does not satisfy the revised grading plan requirements. The sheets need to actually be drafted again to show as-built field conditions. 3) Per a field visit with the engineering inspector it appears that there are handicap access ramps that exceed the maximum slope requirements. An example is the 2 ramps along the east side of the development located adjacent to Units 17 and 79. Provide verification that all handicap access ramps onsite meet the minimum cross slopes and longitudinal slopes per ANSI. Engineering did not measure all ramps after finding deficiencies with 3 or more. The final field visit we will be spot picking ramps to ensure compliance. 4) Per a field visit it appears that areas of dump rock rip rap was missing the required to filter fabric underneath. Engineering picked 4 random locations and removed the rock rip rap down to bare soil without finding the required filter fabric. One such example is the main detention/retention basin along the west side of the property at the outlet of the storm drain pipes. Verify and provide photographic evidence that all location of dump rip rap has the required filter fabric. 5) Per a field visit from the engineering inspector it was noted that the main retention basin had standing water within the basin that exceeded the 24 hour drain down time after the last rain event that hit the area. Provide post-percolation test to ensure that the basin meets the maximum allowed times to ensure that standing water infiltrates within 24 hours. 6) Provide verification from the engineer of record that both the storm drains and the 10'x12' gravel bed with filter fabric was installed correctly per the design. Per the engineering inspector the contractor never called for these inspections prior to back filling and finalizing the drainage improvements so PDSD has no evidence that they were installed correctly. 7) Remove the steel electric or telephone pole that is located at the inlet of the storm drain system. The inlet must be clear of all debris in order to function per design. 8) As stated with out the required revision letter ENG could not provide a full review of the revised development/grading plan. The comments listed above are the ones that stood out upon review. Additional comments maybe provided on the 2nd submittal depending on the revision letter and future field inspections. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide the revision letter and a revised Development/Grading Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above for review. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 09/23/2013 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide a letter that details all the changes made to the accessible parking, ramps, accessible routes and an explanation as to why these changes are necessary. 2. Provide large scale detail on each accessible parking change showing all accessible requirements such as dimensions, grade slopes, aisles, access to the accessible route, location of signage, ramps as required and markings. 3. Show all new access ramps as required and provide a large scale detail of each new ramp. Show in detail what has been done with the abandon access ramps. Identify and describe in detail the ramps that have been removed and sidewalk reconstructed etc? 4. The revised drawings of the next submittal along with the requested letter detailing all the changes made will require an additional review and additional comments may be forthcoming. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/03/2013 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Reqs Change | Revise the plans as requested by other agencies. Should amendments be required to the base plan through the review process, the same amendments will be made to the landscape plan which will then be resubmitted along with the base plan. DS 2-07.2.1. Revise as necessary. |
| 10/04/2013 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Reqs Change | This review has been completed and resubmittal is required. Please resubmit the following items: 1) Three sets of the rolled plans 2) All items requested by review staff 3) All items needed to approve this plan. |
Final Status
| Task End Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/15/2013 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OUT TO CUSTOMER | Completed |
| 10/15/2013 | CPIERCE1 | REJECT SHELF | Completed |