Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D11-0035
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/14/2011 | JWILLIA4 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 11/17/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1. Insure emergency egress from the fenced pool area is provided. |
| 11/22/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 22, 2011 SUBJECT: The Retreat Development Plan Package- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 920 E 22nd Street, T14S R14E Sec19 Ward 5 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D11-0035 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan Package, Drainage Report (Rick Engineering Co, 11OCT11), Geotechnical Engineering Report (Terracon 02SEP11), Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Rick Engineering Co, 07OCT11). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Development Plan Core Review, Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Development Plan, Grading Plan and SWPPP review. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE REPORT: 1) Completed. 2) Completed. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 3) Completed. 4) Completed. 5) Acknowledged. 6) Completed. 7) Completed. 8) Completed. 9) Completed. 10) Completed. 11) Completed. 12) Acknowledged. 13) Completed. 14) Completed. 15) Restated. DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.c: It is acknowledged that an easement is no longer proposed for the billboard area. However the new proposed lease agreement that was submitted still needs to be signed, notarized and recorded. The lease area needs to be delineated on the development plan documents and the recordation information must be labeled in plan view or as a note. 16) D Completed. 17) Omitted. 18) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.M: Revise the development plan documents and Sheet 28 of 62 to provide all horizontal control points. Per the referenced Sheet these points are to be set prior to issuance of final construction plans. That is acceptable however this information is required prior to final Development Package approval through CDRC. 19) Completed. 20) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.1: Revise the development plan document for all access areas of the proposed basin access ramps to clearly show that access from the PAAL is not over a 6-inch vertical curb as proposed. All areas that access the ramps must provide either a curb cut or roll-over curbing along with removable bollards (SD #107) to allow maintenance vehicles to access the ramps without damaging curbing. This applies to the area adjacent to the refuse enclosure and to the access into the basin from the basin weir. Label the gate in plan view and provide dimensions and construction details. 21) Acknowledged. 22) Completed. 23) Completed. 24) Completed. 25) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Revise the grading plan sheets to provide manholes at all junction of the 2 box culverts that exceed angles great than 10 degrees. It is acknowledged that the manholes have been added however they need to be clearly labeled in plan view on the documents and must provide a keynote call out for the PC/COT Standard Detail for Public Improvement for construction purposes. 26) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Provide a copy of the referenced ADOT detail for the proposed culvert headwall detail that is labeled on the documents and within the details. Provide the proposed ADOT detail on the plan and clarify how the outlet headwall is to be constructed. The submittal did not include an attachment for the proposed ADOT detail as stated however just attaching it to the comment letter does not work. If a PC/COT Standard Detail for Public Improvement is not proposed then the ADOT detail must be clearly shown on the development plan document for construction and inspection purposes. 27) Completed. 28) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.3: Revise the development plan document to provide a cross section or detail for the inlet design of the proposed 2 box culverts. Provide the proposed ADOT detail on the plan. The submittal did not include an attachment for the proposed ADOT detail as stated however just attaching it to the comment letter does not work. If a PC/COT Standard Detail for Public Improvement is not proposed then the ADOT detail must be clearly shown on the development plan document for construction and inspection purposes. 29) Completed. 30) Completed. 31) Completed. 32) Completed. 33) Completed. 34) Completed s. 35) Completed. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 36) Completed. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 11/22/2011 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D11-0035 THE RETREAT/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: November 21, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. |
| 11/22/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D11-0035 The Retreat Development Plan (Development Package) TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 22, 2011 DUE DATE: November 29, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 01. The Zoning Review Section approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 02. The Billboard lease area must be clearly depicted on applicable sheets. The lease area must be defined with distance and bearings based on any legal description and any recordation information must be added. (Keynotes may be used to provide the recordation information.) Previous comment no. 9 left as reference - DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.c - Demonstrate compliance for the Billboard loading zone on the site plan sheets or dimensioned detail drawings. See LUC sections 3.4.4.1.B and 3.4.5.26. After discussing the loading requirements with Glenn Moyer the following needs to be addressed. Demonstrate maneuverability into and out of the loading zone, the loading must be must be fully dimensioned, access route, and the design vehicle. A detail drawing of the billboard area should be provided if it is necessary to demonstrate compliance. Also the loading zone should be within the lease area as the intent and use of the loading zone is specifically for the Billboard. Dimension the distance between the edge of the Billboard and the closest edge of the loading zone .03 Any easements that are not abandoned prior to approval of the development plan must be completed before any C of O or final inspection is approved. Recordation of the abandonment must be provided to PDSD Engineering or Zoning prior to release of the hold notice on final inspection or C of O. |
| 11/30/2011 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | Fire Comments: Sheet 4 of 62 and 31,32 etc. The plans show the fire line notes and the meter sizes for sprinklers in the residential buildings. It is our understanding that the buildings will be town houses under the IRC. The fire walls in IRC buildings do not meet the requiements of IFC Appendix B104.2. The fire flow on the Note 9 Public Water plans has to be upgraded to 2750 gpm. Installation of sprinklers will reduce the fire flow to 1500 GPM. |
| 11/30/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 12/01/2011 | JWILLIA4 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 November 30, 2011 To: TRI MILLER, P.E. RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: THE RETREAT Dev. Plan – 2nd submittal D11-0035 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder Ref. A. Development Plan Checklist Requirements – Chapter 18.71 of the Pima County Code - Section J http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf Ref. C - Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapters 5 & 9 (R18-5-205) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-05.htm and (R-18-9-E301) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-09.htm Ref. D - PCRWRD Procedures, Preliminary Sewer Layout Requirements, 1984 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/procedures.pdf Ref. E - PCRWRD Design Standards for Public Sewerage Facilities, 1983 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/design_standards.pdf Ref. F - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/all_det.pdf Ref. G - Pima County Code of Ordinances, Title 13 - Public Services, Division II - Sewers http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=16119&stateID=3&statename=Arizona Ref. H - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, 2003 Edition http://dot.pima.gov/transeng/stdspecsdet/standardspecs2003.pdf Ref. I - PCRWRD Engineering Directives http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/directives/ |
| 12/01/2011 | JWILLIA4 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Date Case Number Project Address October 26, 2011 D11-0035 THE RETREAT DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: Denied, The proposed DEVELOPMENT PLAN for Case No. D11-0035, THE RETREAT dose not the meet the minimum requirements for Environmental Services, Solid Waste Service and Recycle Disposal Standard 6-01. 1. A calculation of the estimated tonnage of Solid Waste and Recycle materials that will be produced from this Development was requested by Environmental Services at the DSD review meeting of November 7, 2011 as of today this information has not been provided for review. This information is necessary to determine if the one compactor and one recycle container proposed will be adequate for the density of this development. This proposed development is a vary high density. The development plan shows only one solid waste compactor and one recycle container. Environmental Services is recommending a minimum of two (2) Solid Waste compactor and two (2) each Eight cubic yard recycle container. To be provided on site for this size of development. The anticipated tonnages of solid waste and recycle materials must be stated and a statement of the frequency of collection and service of the compactor and recycle container must also be stated on the site plan. 2 The statement on note 28 on the site plan is not acceptable to Environmental Services. The note must be changed to state that the owner / and or management group will be responsible for the transporting of the solid waste and recycle materials to the disposables location. (for this site the disposable location is the compactors and recycle containers) . 4. All enclosures must show the gates installed and mounted on the end of the CMU walls mounted on separate post as show on Solid Waste Standards. The minimum inside dimension between the gates must not be less then 12’-0”. (Refer to detail 4 and 5 on sheet DP1) 5. A detail of the compactor enclosure and the recycle enclosures must be shown and dimensioned on the development plans. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 12/05/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 5, 2011 Tri Miller Rick Engineering Company, Inc. 3945 E. Fort Lowell Rd. # 111 Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D11-0035 THE RETREAT Development Package Dear Tri: Your submittal of October 11, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 6 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Package (H/C Site, Zoning, Engineering, Env Svcs, TEP, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 322-6956 |
| 12/05/2011 | JWILLIA4 | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Denied | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#242429 December 5, 2011 Rick Engineering Attn: Paul Lezzi 3945 E Ft Lowell Rd Tucson, Arizona 85712 Dear Mr. Lezzi: SUBJECT: The Retreat - Submittal D11-0035 Tucson Electric Power Company (TEP) has reviewed the plan submitted December 5, 2011. TEP is unable to approve the plan at this time. There are existing electrical facilities within the boundaries of this project. In order for TEP to approve the plan the facilities and easements must be depicted on the plans. • Did not show TEP overhead facilities in 23rd St. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facility map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All costs associated with the relocation of the facilities in conflict will be billable to the developer. Please resubmit two revised bluelines to City of Tucson for TEP’s review. You may contact the area Designer, Mike Kaiser at 918-8244 should you have any questions. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Specialist lm Enclosure cc: DSD_CDRC@Tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |