Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D11-0034
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/04/2011 | JWILLIA4 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/04/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 10/05/2011 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 10/12/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D11-0034 Reliasoft Office Development Plan Revised Phasing (Previous DP D05-1015 expired) TRANSMITTAL DATE: October 11, 2011 DUE DATE: November 1, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is October 4, 2011. 2. Zoning has reviewed this development plan based on the proposed changes to previously approved development plan and taking into account all the new code changes that have been adopted as of the approval of the previously approved plan D05-0015. Comments are made based on the memo prepared by the consultant explaining the proposed changes. Also additional comments are made based on the revised Land Used Code sections and Development Standards that are applicable to this development and site. 3. The following items are related to the Code changes that were to have been made on sheet one (1). Revise the following. Code Review Section Note 6. Revise the floor area ratio (FAR) to 1.50. Note 6 indicates a 150 FAR Note 7. Clarify where on the annexation conditions is there an exemption for cell towers height to 50 feet. Note 8. Review the building setbacks as noted and revise them for consistency with the dimensions noted on the development plan, sheet 2. Note 10. Under the parking calculations section, Phase 2 is listed as no parking provided at this phase. Yet the phase 2 line would indicate that at least 7 and possibly 8 spaces are to be provided in phase 2. Clarify, revise the plan or redo the phase lines to match the calculations. Note 11. Five (5) Accessible parking are listed as being provided in phase 1. Per the plan it is clear that six (6) spaces are within the phase I development. Clarify or revise the calculation as required. Note 12. The number and facility type of bicycle parking required is listed correctly on the plan. However phase 2 is not listed with any facilities. A minimum of 2 short and long term facilities each is required for phase 2. Revise the bicycle parking calculation to reflect this change. Also it does not appear that any bicycle parking facilities have been provided or depicted for the phase 2 building. Please keep in mind that the bicycle parking requirements have changed and that all requirements must be met. Short term facilities must be placed within fifty (50) feet of the front doors of all buildings and must be visible from the door. The plan must demonstrate compliance with this LUC section. 4. Proposed change #9 - Add the five foot access aisle to the bicycle facility details. Also demonstrate on the plans that the short term bicycle facilities will be provided and visible within 50 feet of the front door of the new buildings. If additional details specific to the type and location of the facility is required, add the detail drawings to sheet 1 or 2. 5. Proposed Change #10 - Comment same as #9. 6. Proposed change #19 - The number of parking spaces for Phase 2 must be revised to list the number of spaces to be provided. The temporary drive will affect the number of spaces required and depicted on the plan. Revise as required. 7. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on revision and responses to the Zoning comments. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D011-0034dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan |
| 10/12/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | October 12, 2011 The Engineering Division recommends approval of this Development Plan. |
| 10/20/2011 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Date Case Number Project Address October 20, 2011 D11-0034 RELIASOFT OFFICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: Denied, The proposed DEVELOPMENT PLAN for Case No. D11-0034, RELIASOFT OFFICE, dose not the meet the minimum requirements for Environmental Services, Solid Waste Service and Recycle Disposal Standard 6-01. 1. Containers location must be clearly shown on the Plans and labeled for their intended us being Solid Waste or Recycle materials. The Double Solid Waste enclosure must be rotated in line with the road approach for allow ease of maneuvering of service. . All enclosures must show the gates installed and mounted on the end of the CMU walls or mounted on separate post as show on Solid Waste Standards. The minimum inside dimension between the gates must not be less then 12’-0”. (Refer to detail 4 and 5 on sheet DP1) Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 10/20/2011 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D11-0034 RELIANT OFFICE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: October 18, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Include a legal description on all title blocks. |
| 10/24/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Review conducted by Zelin Canchola. |
| 10/27/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | SHEET DP1 1. Detail 6: a. Provide slope compliance as per ICC~ANSI 117.1, Section 502.5. b. Show location of accessible parking signage c. Show slope of ramps, 1:12 max. d. Maintain an 18' deep parking space not overlaping the accessible route e. Show accessible route width dimension. SHEET DP2 2. At all three marked crossings provide detectable warnings as per ICC~ANSI 117.1, Section 406.12 and 406.14. 3. Provide a large scale detail of the circular ramp system provided at the main entrance to the property. Insure compliance with ICC~ANSI 117.1, Section 405 with handrails as required for slopes more than 5%. 4. Please indicate slopes of all accessible routes. Any slopes greater than 5% must meet code requirements for a ramp, Section 405, with handrails. 5. Reference to detail 8/DP1 is incorrect, no such detail exists. END OF REVIEW |
| 10/28/2011 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 October 27, 2011 To: JEFF STANLEY, P.E. JAS ENGINEERING Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: RELIASOFT OFFICE (Eastside Research Commerce Center, Lot 9) Dev. Plan – 1st submittal D11-0034 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD’s Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Ref. A Sheet 1: Revise General Note #13 to reflect current conditions. There should be both existing and proposed FUE. Ref. A Sheet 2: Show all of the existing public sewer in Eastside Loop including cleanout 2820*01 with rim and invert elevations. Ref. A Sheet 2: Clearly show in both plan and legend existing verses proposed sewer. Also distinguish between public and private sewer. Ref. A This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder Ref. A. Development Plan Checklist Requirements – Chapter 18.71 of the Pima County Code - Section J http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf Ref. C - Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapters 5 & 9 (R18-5-205) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-05.htm and (R-18-9-E301) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-09.htm Ref. D - PCRWRD Procedures, Preliminary Sewer Layout Requirements, 1984 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/procedures.pdf Ref. E - PCRWRD Design Standards for Public Sewerage Facilities, 1983 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/design_standards.pdf Ref. F - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/all_det.pdf Ref. G - Pima County Code of Ordinances, Title 13 - Public Services, Division II - Sewers http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=16119&stateID=3&statename=Arizona Ref. H - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, 2003 Edition http://dot.pima.gov/transeng/stdspecsdet/standardspecs2003.pdf Ref. I - PCRWRD Engineering Directives http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/directives/ |
| 11/01/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the phasing of the project to incorporate an extension of the street landscape border. The border for Phase 2 is required to extend northwest at least to the proposed fence location. LUC 3.7.2.4 2) Incorporate water harvesting basins into any proposed landscape areas. Provide notes and details. |
| 11/01/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES November 1, 2011 Jeff Stanley JAS Engineering PO Box 1888 Tucson, Arizona 85702 Subject: D11-0034 RELIASOFT OFFICE Development Plan Dear Jeff: Your submittal of October 4, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 7 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning, Env Svcs, Addressing, HC Site, Wastewater, Landscape, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to “Pima County Treasurer” for $100.00 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 624-0993 |