Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D11-0029
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/30/2011 | JWILLIA4 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/31/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 09/01/2011 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/07/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: September 7, 2011 SUBJECT: MATA Residence Office Development Plan- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 1004 N 6th Ave, T14S R13E Sec12, Ward 6 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D11-0029 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed development plan and Drainage Statement (Cypress Civil Development, 10AUG11) for the proposed project. Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the development plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE STATEMENT: 1) DS Sec.10-02.4.2.1: As stated under the drainage statement review comments for D10-0033 (Country Club Commerce Center) and D11-0002 (Dairy Queen) the Hydrologic data sheets included in the report need to be revised since they do not comply with DS Sec.10-02 for COT requirements. The City of Tucson requires a 3-inch value for the rainfall depths on a 100-year return period. The NOAA Atlas 14 data used under the County's Flood Peak Procedure software is only acceptable within the County jurisdiction. PDSD let the one project (D10-0033) go with the incorrect data sheets stating that future projects had to use the correct 3-inch rain fall values, revise. 2) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.4.C.1: Revise the drainage statement and the pre/post exhibits to include the limits of the regulatory 100-year floodplain of the West University Wash that effect the property. Label and dimension the 100-year floodplain limits, water surface elevation and Q100 discharge value of the regulatory West University Wash within East 1st Street. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.D: Revise the project location map on Sheet 1. Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as the major watercourses (West University). 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.J: Revise the Legend on Sheet 1 to include the symbol required for the existing 100-year floodplain limits of the West University Wash that affects this property. 5) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: The new development plan number (D11-0029) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan sheets where indicated by "D11-XXXX." 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.A.1: Provide the telephone number for the property owner/developer for the site under the Owner/Developer Section. 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.10: Revise the development plan to add a note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.2.a: Provide the following note on the development plan to read; "The subject parcel is affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations per the mapped 100-year floodplain limits of the West University Wash as shown on the West University Wash Drainage Study." 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.C.2.b: Provide the following note on the development plan to read; "A floodplain use permit will be required for all future work proposed within the mapped 100-year floodplain limits of the regulatory wash as shown on the development plan." 10) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.I.1: Revise the development plan to label and dimension the 100-year floodplain limits, water surface elevation (WSEL) and Q100 discharge value of the regulatory West University Wash. 11) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.I.2: Revise the development plan to include the water surface contour intervals not to exceed 200-feet to verify floodplain limits and future base flood elevation requirements. 12) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the plan sheet to include the minimum 5-foot radius at the new PAAL intersection into the parking area (where labeled as 3-feet). Per DS.Sec.3-05.2.1.C.3.b a minimum unobstructed radius of 5-feet is required for all PAAL intersections if not used for fire access. 13) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.D.3: Revise the development plan and East Side parking space detail to include wheel stops for the parking spaces abutting the existing sidewalk to provide for the required 2.5 foot overhang per DS Sec.3-05.2.3.C.1. 14) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.F: Revise the development plan to label North 6th Avenue as a "MS&R Arterial Route" also label the shown right-of-way as either "existing and/or future." 15) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.6: Revise the development plan to label and dimension the 100-year floodplain limits, water surface elevation (WSEL) and Q100 discharge value of the regulatory West University Wash. The floodplain limits should be in a surveyable manner for future reference. 16) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for any handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. 17) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R: Revise the development plan to correctly label the dimension for the sight visibility triangles as shown. Specifically the Near Side dimension for a PAAL to a Local Road is 185-feet not the 265-feet as shown. 18) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.R: Revise the development plan to provide for the far side sight visibility triangle at the intersection of East 1st Street and North 6th Avenue. The SVT should be dimensioned for a Local Street to an Arterial Street (20'x125'). 19) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.T: Verify or provide approval through Environmental Services for refuse pickup. Per DS Sec.6-01 onsite refuse collection is required and the development plan should reflect the location and access to the required refuse container. If Environmental Service is not requiring onsite collection then PDSD Engineering will approve this comment based on their approval of the development plan. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan and Drainage Statement that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Development Plan and Drainage Statement. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services |
| 09/08/2011 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 September 6, 2011 To: KEVIN HALL, P.E. CYPRESS CIVIL DEVELOPMENT Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: MATA RESIDENCE OFFICE Dev. Plan – 1st submittal D11-0029 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Sheet 1: If no new sewer is proposed then include the following General Note(Ref A): THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. Sheet 2: Show the existing BCS connection for the existing building on site.(Ref A) This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $50.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder Ref. A. Development Plan Checklist Requirements – Chapter 18.71 of the Pima County Code - Section J http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf Ref. C - Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapters 5 & 9 (R18-5-205) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-05.htm and (R-18-9-E301) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-09.htm Ref. D - PCRWRD Procedures, Preliminary Sewer Layout Requirements, 1984 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/procedures.pdf Ref. E - PCRWRD Design Standards for Public Sewerage Facilities, 1983 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/design_standards.pdf Ref. F - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/all_det.pdf Ref. G - Pima County Code of Ordinances, Title 13 - Public Services, Division II - Sewers http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=16119&stateID=3&statename=Arizona Ref. H - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, 2003 Edition http://dot.pima.gov/transeng/stdspecsdet/standardspecs2003.pdf Ref. I - PCRWRD Engineering Directives http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/directives/ |
| 09/09/2011 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#241048 September 9, 2011 Cypress Civil Development Attn: Kevin Hall 2102 N Country Club #9 Tucson, Arizona 85716 Dear Mr. Hall: SUBJECT: Mata Residence Office D11-0029 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted August 30, 2011. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. ricahrd Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 09/09/2011 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> "Monica M. Soto" <MSoto@azdot.gov> 09/09/2011 7:51 AM >>> Regional Traffic Engineering has no comment on this submittal and recommends approval of the development. It will have no impact on any existing ADOT facilities. Thank you. Monica M. Soto Government Intern Arizona Department of Transportation Tucson District MSoto@azdot.gov<mailto:MSoto@azdot.gov> |
| 09/12/2011 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Date Case Number Project Address September 12, 2011 D11-0029 MATA RESIDENCE OFFICE DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: Denied The proposed development, Case No. D11-0029, MATA RESIDENCE OFFICE, Located at 1004 N. 6th Avenue. Must clearly show the following items on the development plan. 1. The Development Plan must address the how solid waste and recycle materials will be handled. 2. The location of existing or new solid waste and recycle containers and enclosures must be shown and labeled on the development plan. 3. A detail must be included on the plans to show the dimensions of any proposed Enclosures or solid waste and recycle containers. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/13/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Approved Review conducted by Zelin Canchola |
| 09/15/2011 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL FROM: Michael St.Paul, Planning Technician PROJECT: D11-0029 1004 North Sixth Avenue Administrative Office TRANSMITTAL: September 15, 2011 COMMENTS: Please attach a response letter with the next submittal, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1) The site is located in the HO-3 zone (LUC Section 2.4.3.2). The proposed use is Administrative Office and the Development Designator is "30" (LUC Sections 3.2.3.2.A.1 and 3.2.3.2.B). The Perimeter Yard Indicator is DD (LUC Section 3.2.6.4). 2) This site is in the HR-3 Zone. Historic review is required (LUC Section 2.8.8.2 & 2.8.8.5). 3) A maximum of one year from the date of application is allowed to obtain approval of a development plan. The one expiration date for this development is August 31st of 2012. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review (LUC Section 5.3.8.2.A). 4) Revise the brief legal description that matches the legal description of the Assessor [Tucson: South 19' of Lot 18, and Lot 19 of Block 5, Excluding the West 5.4 feet and the Spandrel] (DS 2-05.2.1.G.2). 5) "All easement shall be drawn on the plan" (DS 2-05.2.3.B). Provide the recordation information, with dimensions and state the purpose of the easement on the plan (DS 2-05.2.3.B). 6) Correct the dimension for Arizona Avenue to match that provided by the Assessor's record [26.4'] (DS 2-05.2.3.C). 7) Revise the plan to show the correct zoning for the property to the east is HR-2 (DS 2-05.2.4.B). 8) "All proposed easements (utility, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private" (DS 2-05.2.4.G). 9) The sidewalk along the east side of the parking lot does not have adequate width (DS 2-05.2.4.K). A minimum width of four (4') feet is required beyond the two and a half (2.5') feet overhand (LUC Section 3.3.6.8). The sidewalk along the west side of the parking lot only provides three and a half (3.5') feet and four (4') feet is required (LUC Section 3.3.6.8). 10) Depict a curb along the east and north locations of the parking lot (LUC Section 3.3.6.8), along with keynote #15, on the site plan (DS 2-05.2.4.P). 11) The bicycle parking is no longer identified as Class 1 and Class 2, and the calculation requirements have been revised (LUC Section 3.3.8). 12) Two (2) Short-Term and two (2) Long-Term bicycle parking spaces are required (LUC Section 3.3.8.2.B). 13) "Outdoor bicycle parking area must be lighted so that they are thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent sidewalks, parking lots, or buildings during hours of use" (LUC Section 3.3.9.2.A.5). 14) "Long-term bicycle parking not within a building must be lit by overhead lighting" (LUC Section 3.3.9.4.E). 15) Take a look at the new Long-term bicycle parking requirements (LUC Section 3.3.9.4). Pay particular attention to "Security" (LUC Section 3.3.9.5.B). Providing indoor long-term bicycle parking may be more appropriate to your site. 16) Please be aware that additional comments maybe forthcoming relative to additional information provided with subsequent submittals. |
| 09/22/2011 | MICHAEL ST. PAUL | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/26/2011 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D11-0029 MATA RESIDENCE OFFICE/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: September 26, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. On the Final Development Plan delete all the street directions (East and North). Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. |
| 09/28/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Approved | Malini Banerjee <mbanerjee@pagnet.org> CASE: D11-0029 Mata Residence Office: Development Plan COMMENT: NO OBJECTIONS OR ADVERSE COMMENTS Vehicle Trip Generation: Daily: 31 PM Peak: 4 |
| 09/28/2011 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D11-0029 MATA RESIDENCE OFFICE () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - Elevations CROSS REFERENCE: C9-85-22, C9-83-49 NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: University Area Plan and West University Neighborhood Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: September 29, 2001 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Rezoning Conditions () RCP Proposal Complies with Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER:msp 837-6971 DATE: 09/23/2011 Department of Planning and Development Services Community Planning Comments D11-0029 - MATA RESIDENCE OFFICE September 23, 2011 The site is subject to rezoning case C9-85-22. Staff offers the following comments: 1. Please revise development plan D11-0029, sheet 1 of 3 and list verbatim all rezoning conditions of rezoning case C9-85-22, as approved by Mayor and Council on October 21, 1985. 2. Rezoning condition 1.f, requires the retention of the existing façade and appearance of the buildings. Please provide building elevations for the north, south, east, and west building(s) façade. In addition, this property (1004 N. 6th Avenue) is zoned HO-3, a historic classification and your proposed development may be subject to a "historic site" evaluation. Please provide documentation that indicates Historic Preservation Officer, Jonathan Mabry from the City of Tucson, Department of Housing and Community Development has been contacted and informed about project D11-0029, and provide the Historic Preservation Office with any information they may require or need. |
| 09/29/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the DP and LP to note the height and construction of required screen walls. 2) Revise The plans to provide a 5' high screen along 1st Street for the vehicular use area. 3) Provide documentation on the plans of the required license agreement to retain the existing historic wall in the public right of way per condition of rezoning. 4) Revise the wall on the east side of the site to provide a continuous masonry wall screen if necessary. Open fencing is not allowed and a the wall must provide a complete visual barrier, except as may have been allowed per variance C10-90-77. Note any variances and conditions on the plans. 5) Revise the infiltration area designations on the table and plan to correspond. |
| 09/29/2011 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 09/30/2011 | PATRICIA GEHLEN | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 30, 2011 Kevin Hall Cypress Civil Development 2102 North Country Club Road, #9 Tucson, Arizona 85716 Subject: D11-0029 Mata Residence Office Development Plan Dear Kevin: Your submittal of August 30, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 7 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Engineering, Wastewater, ESD, Zoning, Planning, Landscape, PDSD) 5 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Zoning, Planning, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Elevations (Planning, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at (520) 837-4919. Sincerely, Patricia Gehlen (520) 837-4919 All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 798-3341 |
| 09/30/2011 | PGEHLEN1 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 09/30/2011 | PGEHLEN1 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 09/30/2011 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed |