Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D11-0028
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/26/2011 | JWILLIA4 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/29/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 08/30/2011 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 09/07/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D11-0028 Shoe Carnival at El Con Mall Development Plan - Retail Use TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 31, 2011 DUE DATE: September 13, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 01. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is August 28, 2012. 02. DS 2-05.2.1.G.1 - Just for clarification, explain if the "Future Development Site Work" listed in the title block is intended for the water harvesting areas or are the building pads for the proposed uses being graded to a finished grade pad? 03. DS 2-05.2.2.B.2 - This project has been assigned the CDRC case number D11-0028. List the case number on all DP and LS plan sheets as requested by this standard. 04. DS 2-05.2.2.B.3 - The use is not clear from General note #4. Explain if the note is intended to show that the uses of the overall development site include Food Service and General Merchandise. If so the note should be revised to state so. Also a specific use note for the Shoe Carnival should be added. (It is understood that the overall site is a shopping center.) The note states that the PAD is for Food Service and General Merchandise, unless this is a store that is retail and restaurant the note needs to be revised appropriately. 05. DS 2-05.2.2.B.6 - If applicable to this project, list any special process approvals such as B of A, DSMR, etc. List the date and conditions of approval. 06. DS 2-05.2.3.B and .2.4.G - If applicable and due to the fact there no easements are represented on this plan, clarify if there are any easements in the area of the proposed development. Is so draw and label the easement use, width, and recordation information. 07. DS 2-05.2.4.A - Draw and label the existing property lines on DP-2 sheet and where they occur on sheet DP-4. 08. DS 2-05.2.4.D.3 - On sheets Dp-4 and DP-5 label the width of the PAAL directly in front of the sidewalk area and the parking lot (adjacent to the new buildings). 08a. DS 2-05.2.4.K- Clarify how the pedestrian circulation is to be provided to the east side of the development. It is clear that the future buildings may impact the sidewalk system but there should be an effort made to provide a sidewalk from what is now the center of the open mall to the east side of the future building "C" and to provide some continuous circulation to Target and Home Depot. 09. DS 2-05.2.4.M and .N - In order to verify the square footages of the new buildings all footprints must have complete dimensions. Building G and F have been labeled with a length and width dimensions but the square footages listed on the footprint are incorrect. Also clarify what the small building area within or next to Building G is intended to be. It appears that this small area is intended not part of Building G by the way it is depicted. If the square footages are incorrect ensure that all tables are corrected. It is acknowledged that the reduction and demolitions will result in a net loss of 54,477 square feet of building area (assuming the square footages are correct). As I understand it, this development plan will establish a base plan for the overall building square footage once the development plan is approved. Therefore future developments will be based on the correct overall square footages approved on this plan. Label the proposed building height of the new buildings on the building footprints drawn on sheet DP-4. 10. DS 2-05.2.4.P and .Q - With regards to vehicle and bicycle parking. Per this plan the vehicle parking has been redone to provide parking at a ratio of one (1) space per 300 square feet of the overall GFA. Changes in the new parking ordinance also resulted in the revision of the definition of a shopping center. Shopping Center definition (short version) - where no more than 50% of the floor area is dedicated to uses with a parking formula of one (1) space per 100 square feet of the GFA or a more intense formula. In order to verify that this shopping center qualifies for the one (1) space per 300 overall GFA, demonstrate on the plan by listing or including the existing and proposed building square footages of the uses with a one (1) space or more intense parking formula. (I acknowledge that the overall square footage of the uses with a more intense parking formula is less that 50% but there should be a number of that existing square footage listed as reference). Keep in mind that the future buildings are not designated with uses. While the shopping center has been provided with bicycle parking it is not clear on this development plan that all the requirements for location and number of long and short term spaces have been or will be provided. See the new bicycle ordinance for the number of long and short term facilities located as well as the specifics on security, lighting and location especially for the short term facilities. Demonstrate compliance on the plan which includes facility locations, door entrances, and distance from public entrance to the short term facilities. Additional drawings may be required to completely demonstrate compliance with the new bicycle ordinance. Bicycle calculations may have to be revised as required based on the locations and number required for each building. 11. DS 2-05.2.4.T - Clarify what type of refuse collection is proposed for this new building. See also Environment Service and Engineering comments related to this standard. 12. DS 2-05.2.4.W - Indicate on the plan the location and type(s) of signs proposed for this building. 13. DS 2-05.2.4.X - See the landscape reviewer comments related to any landscape or screening requirements. 14. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the responses tot eh zoning comments and revisions to the plan. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D110028dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 09/07/2011 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 August 31, 2011 To: JEFF BEHRANA, P.E. OPTIMUS CIVIL DESIGN GROUP Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: SHOE CARNIVAL AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SITE WORK Dev. Plan – 1st submittal D11-0028 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 09/07/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Please provide large scale detail of passenger loading zone. a. Please show all accessible dimensions, slopes, access aisles, ramps, markings and access to accessible route as per 2006 IBC, Section 1106.7 and ANSI 117.1, Sections 504 and 406. END OF REVIEW |
| 09/08/2011 | FRODRIG2 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Denied | Date Case Number Project Address September 8, 2011 D11-0028 SHOE CARNIVAL EL CON DEVELOPMENT PLAN Comments: Denied The proposed development for Case No. D11-0028, Shoe Carnival El Con Mall, Located at 3500 E. Broadway Boulevard. Must clearly show the following items on the development plan. The location of existing or new solid waste and recycle enclosures must be clearly shown and labeled on the development plan. A detail must be included on the plans to show the dimensions of any proposed enclosures. The proposed locations of Solid Waste compactors most be clearly labeled on the plans Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 09/08/2011 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D11-0028 SHOE CARNIVAL EL CON MALL/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: September 6, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Change the address 3500 E Broadway Bl. to 3601 E Broadway Bl. A suite number will need to be assigned to Shoe Carnival. On the top of sheet 1 delete “The Southwest Quarter” or correct. Under the Location Map delete “S.W.” or correct. Are Buildings A, B, C, etc. separate buildings? If not, do not label as buildings. Label as future development, site work, etc. |
| 09/09/2011 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | 4350 E. Irvington Road, Tucson, AZ 85714 Post Office Box 711, Tucson, AZ 85702 WR#241051 September 9, 2011 Optimus Civil Design Group Attn: Jeff Behrana 4650 E Cotton Center Blvd Suite 200 Phoenix, Arizona 85040 Dear Mr. Behrana: SUBJECT: Shoe Carnival El Con D11-0028 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted August 29, 2011. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. Any relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, electrical load, paving off-site improvements and irrigation plans, if available include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by separate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Mr. ricahrd Harrington New Business Project Manager P. O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 520-917-8726 Should you have any technical questions, please call the area Designer Mike Kaiser at (520) 918-8244. Sincerely, Elizabeth Miranda Office Support Specialist Design/Build lm Enclosures cc: DSD_CDRC@tucsonaz.gov, City of Tucson (email) M. Kaiser, Tucson Electric Power |
| 09/12/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1) A vehicular use area (VUA) must be provided with post barricades or wheel stop curbing designed to prevent parked vehicles from extending beyond the property lines; damaging adjacent landscaping, walls, or buildings and to prevent vehicles from driving onto unimproved portions of the site per DS 3-05.2.3.C. Revise the plans as necessary to provide barriers at the edges of the VUA. 2) Revise the landscape plans as necessary to correspond with any changes made to the development plan. |
| 09/13/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approved | The Engineering Division recommends approval of this Development Plan. |
| 09/13/2011 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D11-0028 Shoe_Carnival @ El Con Mall () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - CROSS REFERENCE: El Con Development Agreement NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Alvernon - Broadway Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: COMMENTS DUE BY: 09/13/2011 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Rezoning () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: (X) Resubmittal Required: () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Other REVIEWER: msp 791-5505 DATE: 09/06/2011 REVIEWER: msp 837-697 09/12/2011 Comments 1. Please provide building elevations (in color) for each elevation façade on Building G (Shoe Carnival), to address Ordinance 10279, VII, General a., which reads as following: An architectural design and color scheme (theme) shall be developed for the entire Mall development, …….., to be compatible with general area and to provide for continuity and consistency in the architecture of the site. 2. Pedestrian accessibility was addressed in Ordinance 10279, when the concept was that once you reach a main entrance into the Mall, the interior of the Mall was integrated with all the shops. However, with the major shift in the Mall being an open air Mall, staff is asking how pedestrian links/traffic will be directed (without leaving the open air Mall area) to existing anchor stores along the eastern perimeter of the Mall, such as Target and Home Depot? |
| 09/13/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Approved Review conducted by Zelin Canchola. |
| 09/14/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES September 14, 2011 Jeff Behrana, P.E. Optimus Civil Design Group 4650 E. Cotton Design Group Phoenix, Arizona Subject: D11-0028 SHOE CARNIVAL EL CON MALL Development Plan Dear Jeff: Your submittal of August 28, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 7 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Plan (Zoning HC, Zoning, Addressing, Env Svcs, Landscape, Planning, PDSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Zoning, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Colored Building Elevations (Planning, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 602-286-9400 |