Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D11-0026
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/14/2012 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 02/16/2012 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: February 16, 2012 SUBJECT: Bella Vista Apartment Development Plan Package- 3rd Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 1900 W Speedway Blvd, T15S R13E Sec3/10 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D11-0026 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised Development Plan Package, Drainage Statement (HILGARTWILSON, 02MAY11, revised 20OCT11 & 09FEB12), Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation (02MAY11, restamped 14FEB12), and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (HILGARTWILSON, 25OCT11). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE REPORT: 1) Completed. 2) Completed. 3) Completed. 4) Completed. 5) Completed. 6) Completed. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 7) Completed. 8) Completed. 9) Completed. 10) Completed. 11) Completed. 12) Completed. 13) Completed. 14) Completed. 15) Completed. 16) Completed. 17) Completed. 18) Completed. 19) Completed. 20) Completed. 21) Completed. 22) Completed. 23) Completed. 24) Completed. 25) Completed. 26) Completed. 27) Completed. 28) Completed. 29) Completed. 30) Completed. 31) Completed. 32) Completed. 33) Completed. 34) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the development plan documents to show the access road at Speedway Blvd with sight visibility triangles. Since Speedway is a designated MS&R street the SVTs are based on the MS&R cross section. The Near Side dimension has now been shown correctly; however now there is no Far Side SVT labeled on the plan, revise. 35) Completed. 36) Acknowledged. 37) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.L: Revise the development plan document to delineate and label all new/proposed easements with recordation information. Specifically 1) revise the recordation information shown for the 65-foot access easement and trash enclosure (the new Sequence is #20112790500) and 2) the recordation information for the 15 sq ft TEP easement as shown in Keynote #6. It is acknowledged that the TEP easement along with the construction and maintenance easement for the offsite drainage improvements will be submitted as one document that will be recorded, however prior to approval this must be submitted and approved for accuracy. 38) Completed. 39) Completed. 40) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.2: Revise the development plan documents and any associated details to label the required minimum filter fabric specifications and rock size. The Development Plan Package is to be used as the construction document for site and grading and must accurately label and detail all improvements in plan view and on all associated details for construction purposes, specifically Detail 8/C1.4. 41) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.2: Revise the development plan documents for the following 2 items: a) Completed. b) Restated: Provide a notarized letter from the adjacent property owner along with a construction and maintenance easement for the proposed Type 4 Catch Basin and stormdrain that is shown offsite on the adjacent property. It is acknowledged that this construction and maintenance easement along with the TEP easement will be submitted as one document that will be recorded, however prior to approval this must be submitted and approved for accuracy. 42) Completed. 43) Completed. 44) Completed. 45) Completed. 46) Completed. 47) Acknowledged. 48) Restated: DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document and associated detail for the refuse enclosure to provide all aspect for construction purposes. The detail must match DS Sec.6-01 and Figure 3a, specifically the clear inside dimension of 10'x10' for each container, minimum compressive strength of 3,000 psi for the 6-inch concrete slab, bollards located on the side of the enclosure between the wall and the container, etc. 49) Acknowledged. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 50) Acknowledged: Due to the bleed pipe within the bottom of each basin and the amount of ponding water left in the basin the final grading inspection will not be approved until an addendum to the Geotechnical Evaluation is provided with the as-built certification letter showing that percolation rates for the retention basins for 5-year threshold meets the drain down time maximum per DS Sec.10-01.3.5.1. SWPPP: The proposed SWPPP meets the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). However the SWPPP and Exhibits can not be stamped approved until approval of the development plan package, D11-0026. No resubmittal is required. HDZ & Scenic OVERLAY COMMENTS: 51) For all HDZ and Scenic Overlay comments refer to Activity # T11SA00336. GENERAL COMMENTS: A meeting is requested to discuss this project with the Engineering Division and the consultant to help expedite the resubmittal prior to resubmitting the plans due to the 5 comments that have being restated for the 3rd time. I can be reached at 837-4929 to schedule a meeting. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 02/21/2012 | JWILLIA4 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 February 17, 2012 To: HILGART WILSON HILGART WILSON, INC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: BELLA VISTA APARTMENTS Dev. Plan – 3rd submittal D11-0026 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Sheet 1: Eliminate Wastewater Note # 1 and fill in the blanks for Note #6. 2. Sheet 10: Call out the proposed private sewer as DIP where depth of sewer is less then 4’. 3. Sheet 10: Contact Mr. Steve Reuter with PCRWRD @ (520)740-6608 to begin the abandonment process of the existing 6” public sewer on-site as proposed by plan. 4. Sheet 10: Install a private manhole at least 10’ upstream of existing MH# 9522-01and outside the public sewer easement, to allow for gravity flow into the existing public MH# 9522-01. 5. Sheet 10: Show the public sewer easement with recordation information over all of the existing public sewer shown on plan. 6. Sheet 10: Call out the easement or agreement for the private drive east of the site which provides access for PCRWRD to the property. 7. Sheet 10: Show on plan or demonstrate clear access to MH #9522-01 for PCRWRD maintenance vehicle per WWM Detail 109-111. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the fourth(4th) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder Ref. A. Development Plan Checklist Requirements – Chapter 18.71 of the Pima County Code - Section J http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf Ref. C - Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapters 5 & 9 (R18-5-205) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-05.htm and (R-18-9-E301) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-09.htm Ref. D - PCRWRD Procedures, Preliminary Sewer Layout Requirements, 1984 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/procedures.pdf Ref. E - PCRWRD Design Standards for Public Sewerage Facilities, 1983 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/design_standards.pdf Ref. F - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/all_det.pdf Ref. G - Pima County Code of Ordinances, Title 13 - Public Services, Division II - Sewers http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=16119&stateID=3&statename=Arizona Ref. H - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, 2003 Edition http://dot.pima.gov/transeng/stdspecsdet/standardspecs2003.pdf Ref. I - PCRWRD Engineering Directives http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/directives/ |
| 02/22/2012 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | 201 N. STONE AV., 2ND FL TUCSON, AZ 85701-1207 AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D11-026 BELLA VISTA APARTMENTS/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: February 22, 2012 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. |
| 02/23/2012 | FRODRIG2 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Please see conditional approval from previous review. |
| 02/23/2012 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Bella Vista Apartments Development Package (3rd Review) D11-0026 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 23, 2012 DUE DATE: March 01, 2012 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. The following comments are based on Development Package Submittal Requirements Dated 12-20-07: 1. This comment has not been addressed. Sheet L1.0 should follow sheet C4.0. Is sheet C4.0 really needed, it is not needed by Zoning. Review Development Package Submittal Requirements Dated 12-20-07: and put the drawing sheets in the appropriate order. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0 1. Based on information within the COT Permits Plus System this lot split has not been completed. The recorded documents need to be provided to the COT Planning and Development Services along with the plans that reflect all required PDSD agencies approval stamps prior to approval of the building permits. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E The proposed lot split, S11-018, will need to be complete prior to approval of the development package. 2. This comment was not addressed correctly. Detail 1/A9.0 still shows the "2'-6" space between the bike racks. LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.6 requires each short-term bicycle parking space be at least two (2) feet by six (6) feet. That said the distance between racks must be 4'-0", show the two (2) feet by six (6) feet area on the plan similar to LUC Section 3.3.9.5.B. LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.7 requires that a bicycle rack must be a minimum of two and one-half (2½) feet from a wall or other obstruction. Show the two and one-half (2½) feet similar to LUC Section 3.3.9.5.B. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Detail 1 sheet A9.0 does not show how the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.6, 7 & 8 are met, provide this information on the detail. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D11-0026 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Bella Vista Apartments Development Package (3rd Review) T11BU01121 TRANSMITTAL DATE: February 23, 2012 DUE DATE: March 01, 2012 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development package has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 02/23/2012 | FRODRIG2 | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES February 23, 2012 Philip Carhuff Krebs Carhuff Architects 3149 E. Prince Road # 151 Tucson, Arizona 85716 Subject: D11-0026 BELLA VISTA APARTMENTS Development Package Dear Philip: Your submittal of August 23, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 3 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 3 Copies Revised Development Package (Engineering, Wastewater, PDSD) 2 Copies Notarized Letter from Adjacent Property Owner (Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 577-4599 |
| 02/23/2012 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 02/23/2012 | FRODRIG2 | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1) Revise the plans to address required screening of the new parking lot/access drive (within 100' of the property line) from the residentially zoned property to the east. LUC 3.7.3, 3.7.2-I. Screening can be located at the property line, or at any point between 20 feet beyond the property line and the paved areas. Revise all plans as necessary. |