Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D11-0026
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/26/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 10/27/2011 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 11/04/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | >>> Zelin Canchola 11/03/2011 1:36 PM >>> D11 0026 Bella Vista Apartments - Approved by TDOT Traffic Engineering |
| 11/08/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Bella Vista Apartments Development Package (2nd Review) D11-0026 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 8, 2011 DUE DATE: November 28, 2011 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is June 30, 2012. 2. As this development package has not been approved remove all revision clouds and deltas from the plan. The following comments are based on Development Package Submittal Requirements Dated 12-20-07: 1. Review Development Package Submittal Requirements Dated 12-20-07: and put the drawing sheets in the appropriate order. The following comments are based on Development Standard 2-01.0 1. D.S. 2-01.3.9.E The proposed lot split, S11-018, will need to be complete prior to approval of the development package. 2. This comment was not addressed correctly. LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.6 requires each short-term bicycle parking space be at least two (2) feet by six (6) feet. That said the distance between racks must be 4'-0", show the two (2) feet by six (6) feet area on the plan similar to LUC Section 3.3.9.5.B. LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.7 requires that a bicycle rack must be a minimum of two and one-half (2½) feet from a wall or other obstruction. Show the two and one-half (2½) feet similar to LUC Section 3.3.9.5.B. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Detail 1 sheet A9.0 does not show how the requirements of LUC Section 3.3.9.2.B.6, 7 & 8 are met, provide this information on the detail. 3. D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.5.d The proposed access aisle that connects to the adjacent parking does not line up with the PAAL on the south property. The propose access aisle cuts off the back end of the northeast parking space. Either align the propose access aisle with the existing or remove the parking space and show that the existing site meets the parking requirements. 4. This comment has not been addressed. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Clearly show all required pedestrian circulation paths/accessible routes on the plan. D.S. 2-01.3.9.R Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 Provide a pedestrian circulation/access route from the proposed buildings to the right-of-way along Speedway Blvd. 5. Provide the date of approval for the Overlay zones in note 3. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D11-0026 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package. CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Bella Vista Apartments Development Package (2nd Review) T11BU01121 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 8, 2011 DUE DATE: November 28, 2011 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning cannot approve the grading plan until the development package has been approved. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Planning and Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Bella Vista Apartments Overlay Zone (2nd Review) T11SA00336 TRANSMITTAL DATE: November 8, 2011 DUE DATE: November 28, 2011 GRADING PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. The Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the overlay plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements. 2. Provide the date of approval for the Overlay zones in note 3. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package |
| 11/09/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Need accessible route to Speedway Blvd right of way. |
| 11/15/2011 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D11-026 BELLA VISTA APARTMENTS/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: November 15, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: On the Location Map correct the section corners. Add the section, township and range to all title blocks per letter dated 09-23-11. Correct the address on all title blocks. Number the buildings, no letters per letter dated 09-23-11. |
| 11/18/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: November 17, 2011 SUBJECT: Bella Vista Apartment Development Plan Package- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 1900 W Speedway Blvd, T15S R13E Sec3/10 Ward 1 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D11-0026 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revised Development Plan Package, Drainage Statement (HILGARTWILSON, 02MAY11, revised 20OCT11), Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation (02MAY11), and Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (HILGARTWILSON, 25OCT11). Engineering Division does not recommend approval of the Development Plan Package at this time. This review falls under the Development Plan Core Review, Development Standard 2-01. All comments reflect Development Plan, Grading Plan and HDZ review. The following items need to be addressed: DRAINAGE REPORT: 1) Completed. 2) Completed. 3) Completed. 4) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.4.C.1: Revise the Drainage Statement to delineate the limits of the 100-year floodplain of the mapped regulatory wash on both the pre and post development exhibits. Provide the WSEL cross section on the exhibits and verify that the development plan documents clearly labels these in plan view to match. The Figure provided only covers the property to the west and does not show the subject property. Clearly label the Figure (i.e. 1, 2, 3) to correspond to the Drainage Statement. 5) DS Sec.10-02.2.3.1.4.C.5: Revise the Drainage Statement to delineate the limits of the erosion hazard setback from the mapped regulatory wash on both the pre and post development exhibits. The Figure provided only covers the property to the west and does not show the subject property. Clearly label the Figure to correspond to the Drainage Statement. 6) Completed. DEVELOPMENT PLAN: As this development package has not been approved remove all revision clouds and deltas from the plan for clarity. 7) Completed. 8) Completed. 9) Completed. 10) Completed. 11) Completed. 12) Acknowledged. DS Sec.2-01.3.2.B: Revise the Title Block to include a brief legal description of the property after the approval of the Assessor's Office. 13) Completed. 14) Completed. 15) DS Sec.2-01.3.3: Revise the development plan documents to include all relevant case numbers (D11-0026, T11SA00336 and S11-018) in the lower right hand corner of the plan on all sheets. The existing location on the plan is NOT in the lower right hand corner per the Development Standard requirement. 16) Completed. 17) Completed. 18) Completed. 19) Completed. 20) Completed. 21) Completed. 22) Completed. 23) Completed. 24) Completed. 25) Completed. 26) DS Sec.2-01.3.7.C.3.a/b: Clarify the discrepancy between the Architect and Civil Notes for the total miles of Public/Private streets. The General Note #3 on the Architect Sheet has Zero for both, however the Development Note on the Civil Sheet list Zero for Public and 0.11 for Private, clarify. If a private roadway is being constructed then it must meet the minimum requirements within DS Sec.3-01. 27) Completed. 28) Completed. 29) Completed." 30) DS Sec.2-01.3.8.C: Revise the development plan document to label the dimension for the shown ½-right of way for Speedway. The Existing/Future label has been added however now the actual dimension has been removed, revise. 31) Completed. 32) Completed. 33) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.1: Revise the development plan documents to provide a concrete header at the existing driveway entrance to prevent damage to the existing roadway. The concrete header must extend the entire length of the deceleration lane unless TDOT is requiring a 6-inch vertical curb per a PIA plan, clarify. 34) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.2: Revise the development plan documents to show the access road at Speedway Blvd with sight visibility triangles. Since Speedway is a designated MS&R street the SVTs are based on the MS&R cross section. The Near Side dimension shown as 20'x125' is not correct, revise. 35) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.H.5.a: Revise the development plan document to show the proposed access aisle that connects to the adjacent parking lot correctly lines up with the existing PAAL on the south property. The proposed access aisle cuts off the back end of the northeast parking space. Either align the PAALs for maneuverability or remove the parking space and show that the existing site meets the parking requirements. 36) Acknowledged. 37) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.L: Revise the development plan document to delineate and label all new/proposed easements with recordation information. Specifically verify 1) ingress/egress across all offsite parcels for the existing access road off of Speedway, and 2) the recordation information for the 15 sq ft TEP easement as shown in Keynote #6. The existing access road off of Speedway must have an ingress/egress easement for legal access across all properties. Verify that the access road meets the minimum PAAL requirements per DS Sec.3-05 (specifically curbing for vehicular separation from the PAAL to the undisturbed portions of the property). 38) Completed. 39) Completed. 40) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.2: Revise the development plan documents and any associated details to label the required minimum filter fabric specifications and rock size. The Development Plan Package is to be used as the construction document for site and grading and must accurately label and detail all improvements in plan view and on all associated details (Sheet C1.2) for construction purposes. 41) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.N.2: Revise the development plan documents for the following 2 items: a) Revise Detail 8/C1.2 to provide the referenced MAG Spec 220 detail or reference a PC/COT Standard Detail for Public Improvement. Any detail from different jurisdictions is required to be shown in plan view for inspection and construction purposes. b) Provide a notarized letter from the adjacent property owner along with a construction and maintenance easement for the proposed Type 4 Catch Basin that is shown offsite on the adjacent property. 42) Completed. 43) Completed. 44) Completed. 45) Completed. 46) Completed. 47) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document to clearly label all required pedestrian circulation paths/accessible routes to the public right-of-way. Per DS Sec.2-08.3.1 Provide a pedestrian circulation/access route from the proposed buildings to the right-of-way along Speedway Blvd, sidewalk must comply with accessibility requirements. At a minimum a DSMR will be required to modify any Development Standards. Any "negotiations" with COT must be provided in writing at the next submittal. 48) DS Sec.2-01.3.9.T: Revise the development plan document and associated detail for the refuse enclosure to provide all aspect for construction purposes. The detail must match DS Sec.6-01 and Figure 3a, specifically Detail 6/A9.0 and the reference to STD. Detail PE-146-4, clarify. 49) Acknowledged. Refer to any applicable comments from the Landscaping Section that may affect this project. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT: 50) DS Sec.10-01.3.5.1: Provide an addendum to the Geotechnical Evaluation that provides percolation rates for the retention basins for 5-year threshold to show that the drain down time meets the maximum per DS Sec.10-01.3.5.1. The proposed report did not have a discussion that included infiltration tests. SWPPP: The proposed SWPPP meets the minimum requirements of the AzPDES Construction General Permit (CGP). However the SWPPP and Exhibits can not be stamped approved until approval of the development plan package, D11-0026. No resubmittal is required. HDZ & Scenic OVERLAY COMMENTS: 51) For all HDZ and Scenic Overlay comments refer to Activity # T11SA00336. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan Package, Drainage Statement, and Geotechnical Evaluation addendum that addresses the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon re-submittal of the Development Plan Package. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 11/23/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | 1) Revise the plans to address required screening of the new parking lot/access drive (within 100' of the property line) from the residentially zoned property to the east. LUC 3.7.3, 3.7.2-I. Screening can be located at the property line, or at any point between 20 feet beyond the property line and the paved areas. Revise all plans as necessary. |
| 12/01/2011 | JWILLIA4 | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | PIMA COUNTY REGIONAL WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DEPARTMENT 201 NORTH STONE AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA 85701-1207 JACKSON JENKINS PH: (520) 740-6500 DIRECTOR FAX: (520) 620-0135 November 4, 2011 To: HILGART WILSON HILGART WILSON, INC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: BELLA VISTA APARTMENTS Dev. Plan – 2nd submittal D11-0026 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: 1. Obtain a letter from the PCRWRD’s Development Liaison Unit, written within the past year, stating that treatment and conveyance system capacity for the project is available in the downstream public sewerage system and provide a copy of that letter to this office. The required form to request such a letter may be found at: http://www.pima.gov/wwm/developer.htm#permits The development plan for this project cannot be approved until a copy of this letter has been received by this office. Ref. A, D and E 2. Redesign sewer to be entirely gravity flow. Evaluate adjusting the existing public line between IMS 9522-02 to 9522-02a to accommodate gravity inflows from your property. The existing onsite public portion would be abandoned and the new sewer on site will be gravity flow and private. Ref. A, D and E 3. Revise plan Per Pima County Zoning Code 18.71 All lettering and dimensions will be no smaller than 1/8” in size. Ref. A 4. Label IMS #’s, rim, and inverts for all of the public manholes and cleanouts shown on the plan. For all sewer pipes label size, slope and material. 2nd Request Ref. A 5. Revise plan to show sewer notes only on the front page of the Development Plan and eliminate Wastewater Note #1 on Sheet 1. Ref. A 6. Clarify Hilgart Wilson note number 18 as it relates to this project. 7. Revise sewer symbology shown in the legend to be consistent with plan view references. Ref. A 8. Revise plan to clearly show accessibility to public sewer lines and manholes consistent with RWRD Detail 109-111. 2nd Request Ref. A, D and E 9. Reference and label all recording information for the existing public sewer. 2nd Request Ref. A, D and E This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the third(3rd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $78.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:_________ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder Ref. A. Development Plan Checklist Requirements – Chapter 18.71 of the Pima County Code - Section J http://www.pimaxpress.com/SubDivision/Documents/2006/DP_Requirements2Aug04.pdf Ref. C - Arizona Administrative Code, Title 18, Chapters 5 & 9 (R18-5-205) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-05.htm and (R-18-9-E301) http://www.azsos.gov/public_services/Title_18/18-09.htm Ref. D - PCRWRD Procedures, Preliminary Sewer Layout Requirements, 1984 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/procedures.pdf Ref. E - PCRWRD Design Standards for Public Sewerage Facilities, 1983 (revised April 1988) http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/design_standards.pdf Ref. F - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Details http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/stddet/pdf/all_det.pdf Ref. G - Pima County Code of Ordinances, Title 13 - Public Services, Division II - Sewers http://library.municode.com/index.aspx?clientID=16119&stateID=3&statename=Arizona Ref. H - City of Tucson/Pima County Standard Specifications for Public Improvements, 2003 Edition http://dot.pima.gov/transeng/stdspecsdet/standardspecs2003.pdf Ref. I - PCRWRD Engineering Directives http://www.pima.gov/wwm/eng/directives/ |
| 12/02/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES December 2, 2011 Philip Carhuff Krebs Carhuff Architects 3149 E. Prince Road #151 Tucson, Arizona 85716 Subject: D11-0026 BELLA VISTA APARTMENTS Development Package Dear Philip: Your submittal of August 23, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 7 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 7 Copies Revised Development Package (Zoning, H/C Site, Addressing, Engineering, Landscape, Wastewater, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Statement (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Geotechnical Report (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to “Pima County Treasurer” for $78 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 577-4560 |