Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D11-0016
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/20/2011 | JWILLIA4 | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/20/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/23/2011 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/26/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | DATE: May 26, 2011 SUBJECT: B/E Aerospace Development Plan- Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 1851 S Pantano Road, T14S R15E Sec20, Ward 4 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D11-0016 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received the proposed development plan for the proposed project. Engineering Division has reviewed the submitted development plan and does not recommend approval at this time. The following items need to be addressed: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.D: Revise the project location map on Sheet 1. The map should cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. a) Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area. b) Identify conditions within the square mile area, such as major streets and watercourses. c) Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 2) DS Sec.2-05.2.1.K: The new Development Plan number (D11-0016) may be added to the lower right hand corner of the plan sheets. 3) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.10: Revise the Development Plan to add a note stating that the project is designed to meet the overlay zone criteria: Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 4) DS Sec.2-05.2.3.B: Revise the Development Plan to remove the easement that is to be or is abandoned per Keynote #32. If the easement is already abandoned it should not be shown on the plan sheet. If the easement is proposed to be abandoned then remove it from the sheet and provide the recordation information for abandonment. 5) DS Sec.2-03.2.3.C: Revise the Development Plan to label and dimension the existing right-of-way for Pantano Road. Clearly label the centerline of the roadway. 6) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.F: Revise the Development Plan to label and dimension the future MS&R right-of-way for Pantano Road. Since street dedication is not required or proposed and the project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for Pantano Road. The future MS&R right-of-way is 100-feet with an 11-foot sidewalk area, per TDOT the ½ right-of-way is to be from the centerline of the street (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of-way lines, etc.). 7) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.H.2: Revise the Development Plan to provide more details for the reconfiguration of the drainage swale located adjacent to the southwest corner of the proposed building. If construction details are provided for site work on the Development Plan then a grading plan and grading application will not be required. Verify that water drains away from the structures foundation by providing spot elevations for proposed slopes along with any erosion protection required in the swale to allow the water to drain into the PAAL along its historic path. 8) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.I: Revise the Development Plan set to label and dimension the sight visibility triangle (SVT) for the intersection of Research Loop and Pantano Road. No structure is allowed to encroach within the SVT that would obscure the line of sight between 30-inches and 6-feet through a triangular area adjacent to a PAAL, alley or a street intersection. 9) DS Sec.2-05.2.4.K: Refer to comments from Ron Brown, RA Structural Plans Examiner for any handicap accessibility comments that may be associated with this project. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide a revised Development Plan that address the comments provided above. Include a comprehensive response letter addressing in detail responses to all of the above comments. Further comments may be generated upon resubmittal of the Development Plan. For any questions or to schedule meetings call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Division Planning & Development Services |
| 05/26/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/02/2011 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Denied | Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Jackson Jenkins Director 201 N. Stone Ave., 8th Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 PH: (520) 740-6500 FAX: (520) 620-0135 May 27, 2011 To: WALTER HOGE RIO WEST DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTION Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: B/E AEROSPACE, INC Development Plan – 1st Submittal D11-0016 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: Sheet DV-1: Revise General Note # 12 to read as follows: THE ON-SITE SANITARY SEWERS WILL BE PRIVATE AND WILL BE CONSTRUCTED, OPERATED AND MAINTAINED ON A PRIVATE BASIS, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE PLAN, IF REQUIRED. THE LOCATION AND METHOD OF CONNECTION TO AN EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY SEWER IS SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE PIMA COUNTY WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. Sheet DV-1: If no new sewer is proposed then remove General Note # 12 and insert the following note: THE ON-SITE SEWERS ARE EXISTING AND PRIVATE. NO NEW SEWERS ARE PROPOSED. Sheet DV-3: Call out the IMS #’s with rim and invert elevations for all of the existing public manholes shown on plan. Also call out the construction plan # and pipe size for the existing public sewer on plan. Sheet DV-3: Call out all cleanouts and manholes, both existing and proposed, on site and show the rim and invert elevations. Also call out the existing and proposed on-site sewer as private. Sheet DV-3: Show the pipe size/length and slope for the existing and proposed on-site sewer. This office will require a revised set of bluelines, and a response letter, addressing these comments. Additional comments may be made during the review of these documents. Pima County Code Title 13.20.030.A.2 requires that a wastewater review fee be paid for each submittal of the development plan. The fee for the first submittal is $166 plus $50 per sheet. For the second submittal, the review fee is $50 per sheet. For all subsequent submittals, the review fee is $39 per sheet. The next submittal of this project will be the second(2nd) submittal. A check for the review fee of this submittal in the amount of $100.00 (made out to PIMA COUNTY TREASURER) must accompany the revised set of bluelines and response letter. If the number of sheets changes, please adjust the review fee accordingly. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:______ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 06/06/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Phase II plans may be required to document Landscape and Screening and Native Plant Preservation code compliance for the entire site to address any non-conforming or unpermitted site or landscape modifications. The current site is subject the regulations in place when it received zoning/landscape approval. Approval of the Phase 1 plans does not reduce or modify applicability of the original approvals or any applicable codes. LUC 3.7.1.2 & LUC 3.8. |
| 06/07/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 06/07/2011 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D11-0016 BE Aerospace Development Package TRANSMITTAL: 06/07/2011 DUE DATE: 06/07/2011 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 05/19/2012. 2. Zoning acknowledges that there are items on the site that does not meet LUC and Development Standards which are to be corrected on the "phase 2" submittal. There will be no C of O issued for the addition until all items are completed on the next submittal. Any and all changes made at this time are required to meet the LUC and Development Standards. 3. DS 2-01.2.5 A three (3) inch by five (5) inch space shall be reserved in the lower right quadrant of each sheet for an approval stamp. 4. DS 2-01.2.6 A small, project-location map shall be provided in the upper right corner of the cover sheet. 5. DS 2-01.2.7 The north arrow, contour interval, and scale as applicable to each sheet should be placed together in the upper right corner of each sheet. 6. DS 2-01.3.3 Relevant case numbers (development package document, rezoning, board of adjustment, DDO, MDR, DSMR, overlay, etc.) shall be provided adjacent to the title block on each sheet. This plan has been assigned case number D11-0016. Provide also the previous case numbers from the last approved plan (CO 12-84-124, etc.) 7. DS 2-01.3.4 The project-location map shall cover approximately one (1) square mile, be drawn at a minimum scale of 3" = 1 mile, and provide the following information. A. Show the subject property approximately centered within the one (1) square mile area. B. Identify major streets and regional watercourses within the square mile area and all streets that abut the subject property. C. Section, township, and range; section corners; north arrow; and the scale will be labeled. 8. DS 2-01.3.7.A.6.b Provide a general note stating that this project is designed to meet the overlay criteria of Sec. 2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone. 9. DS 2-01.3.7.A.7 the property is subject to annexation requirements, provide the applicable C9-__-__ or C15-__-__ annexation file number, in the lower right corner of each sheet. 10. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.c Provide the building area expansion calculation. Provide dimensions on the foot print of the proposed addition. 11. DS 2-01.3.9.F All existing zoning classifications on and adjacent to the project (including across any adjacent right-of-way) shall be indicated on the drawing with zoning boundaries clearly defined. 12. DS 2-01.3.9.H.1 Provide the widths of all PAALs which are being reconfigured. 13. DS 2-01.3.9.H.2 Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 14. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a A typical parking space detail shall be provided for both standard parking spaces and those for the physically disabled. Based on the last approved site plan and the number of provided parking spaces, 7 handicap parking spaces are required. Clearly indicate location and all handicap parking spaces, handicap ramps, access aisles, etc. 15. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.d Clearly indicate the location of the indicated 7 type b (long term) bicycle parking spaces. 16. DS 2-01.3.9.J The project site is adjacent to a Major Street or Route, draw the Major Street right-of-way lines for those streets. (Add the MS&R future sidewalk, right-of -way lines, sight visibility triangles, etc.) 17. DS 2-01.3.9.L If applicable, all proposed easements (utility, sewer, drainage, access, etc.) are to be dimensioned and labeled as to their purposes and whether they will be public or private. 18. DS 2-01.3.9.O Provide all applicable building setback lines from property lines and/or future curb. 19. DS 2-01.3.9.Q The indicated allowed building height is incorrect. Per annexation condition section 5 number 1 the maximum allowed height is 35', revise calculations. 20. DS 2-01.3.9.R Clearly indicate the pedestrian circulation path from the handicap parking spaces to the building, from the bicycle parking spaces to the building, and the required sidewalk between a parking space accessed by a PAAL and a building. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D11-0016dp.doc |
| 06/08/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 8, 2011 Mario Chavez Seaver Franks Architects 2552 N. Alvernon Way Tucson, Arizona 85712 Subject: D11-0016 BE AEROSPACE Development Plan Dear Mario: Your submittal of May 20, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 5 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Package (Engineering, Wastewater, Landscape, Zoning, PDSD) 2 Copies Easement Abandonment Documentation (If Necessary) (Engineering, PDSD) 1 Check Made out to "Pima County Treasurer" for $100 (Wastewater) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 795-9431 |