Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D11-0015
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/13/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/13/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/16/2011 | MARTIN BROWN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/31/2011 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | CDRC Review Planning and Development Services Dept. - Community Planning Review D11-0015, Walmart #1291 Improvements, 1st submittal Comments Due: 6/14/11 Items reviewed: Development Plan Package · Gateway Centre PAD-3, Development Area 1a · Gateway Route Comments: Denied. Please resubmit, and address the following. 1) Please provide most recent development plan for the Walmart that includes the existing Walmart site layout, with calculations etc; and include this information with new calculations on the submitted development plan. 2) Per Gateway Centre PAD, landscaping within parking lot to follow City of Tucson LUC, i.e. 1 tree per every 4 parking spaces. Sheet CP-6.0, 7 of 8, does not show any trees in the parking area. Please correct. 3) The Gateway Centre PAD calls out that parking areas are to be designed to facilitate both vehicular and pedestrian movements. The proposed design on Sheet CP-6.0 does not demonstrate that the proposed parking lot is to be integrated into the existing parking area. Also the proposed parking area appears to create a bottleneck for ingress/egress onto the site at the N. Financial Center Drive access entrance. Please correct to show that proposed parking area will be fully integrated into the existing parking area, i.e. pedestrian linkages, and vehicular movement that emphasizes both internal and external linkages. Reviewed by: John Beall, 5/24/11 |
| 06/08/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | Please provide total parking calculations for the entire facility and then provide accessible parking spaces required as per Tavle 1106.1 and show all existing accessible parking spaces. Provide new accessible spaces as required for additional new parking added to facility. |
| 06/13/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 06/13/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D11-0015 Walmart #1291 Improvements Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: June 13, 2011 DUE DATE: June 14, 20011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is May 12, 2012. 2. Please address the following items and resubmit for review. Additional zoning comments may be forthcoming on the next review based on the revised plans and responses to zoning comments. a. Clarify when this lot was, split, combined or otherwise. Per the plan the parcel is drawn with a distance and bearing describing the parcel. Per the Pima County Assessor's information it appears that the parcel in question has been combined with the Walmart parcel. If this is the case the calculations related to lot or parcel size etc. must be revised and must include the overall site acreage. The information related to the parcel should be listed as reference info for purposes of the demo and rework. Provide the recorded documentation if this parcel has indeed been combined with the Walmart parcel. b. An overall site plan that includes the bank parcel and the existing Walmart development must be included in the development plan package. New overall calculations must be revised on sheet 7 (or on new overall site plan sheet) to include overall site area (which includes a site area expansion calculation), overall vehicle parking, overall bicycle parking, and overall disabled standard and van parking spaces, revised FAR and lot coverage if applicable. Follow the PAD document development criteria where applicable and criteria that defaults to the LUC. Please keep in mind that the expansion of the site area changes the overall site and must be depicted as the most current site plan. The new plan will be the plan that will be referred to in the future as the most current site/development plan. c. Clarify if the driveway access along the south side of the old bank parcel is one or two way access. Label on sheet 7 the width of the two access driveways along the east side of the old bank parcel. d. Label the angle of the parking spaces to verify compliance with the parking space dimensions per development standards 3-05. e. Additional disabled parking may be required based on the number of additional parking spaces provided. Additional bicycle parking spaces may be required as well. While the additional parking is not being required but is proposed by the owners, the parking lot design and ratios for both the vehicle and bicycle parking requirements are to be based on the most current code requirement. The new parking ratio only applies to the new parking area. This must be clearly identified on sheet 7 or the extra overall site plan. Two parking calculations will be demonstrated on the plan. f. Landscaping within the new parking area will be required unless the PAD overrides current landscape requirements in the LUC. g. Include with the next submittal a copies of the approved development plans for the Walmart and bank developments. h. Additional comments may be forthcoming based on the responses to the zoning comments and the revisions requested to be made to the plans and the inclusion of requested drawings. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 837-4957. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D110015dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan and additional requested documents. |
| 06/14/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | LUC REQUIREMENTS 1) Within a vehicular use area, one (1) canopy tree is required for each four (4) motor vehicle parking spaces or fraction thereof. LUC 3.7.2.3.A.1 Revise the plans to provide the required parking area trees. 2) Canopy trees must be evenly distributed throughout the vehicular use area. Every parking space shall be located within forty (40) feet of the trunk of a canopy tree (as measured from the center of the tree trunk). LUC 3.7.2.3.A Revise the landscape plan as necessary. 3) Show and identify existing plants to remain in place on the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.2.A.1.e 4) Revise the landscape plan to show the locations and height of any proposed or existing screen walls. DS 2-07.A.3 5) Any change in design or land use requires a new review and approval process for the landscape plan. DS 2-07.2.0 Submit a revised landscape plan for the site. GATEWAY CENTRE PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 6) Streetscapes: In order to achieve a uniform landscape theme within the Planned Area Development Area, the areas within the street medians, parking strips, and streetscape setback areas shall have a coordinated landscape palette. P. IX-11 7) Parking and outdoor storage areas shall be screened from view off the property by the use of fencing, walls and/or landscaping. 8) All parking lot and driveway lighting should provide uniform illumination. Accent illumination is recommended at key points such as entrances, exits, loading zones and drives. Ensure that any proposed lighting does not conflict with tree plantings. Design the placement of trees in coordination with the outdoor lighting, so that the trees, at maturity, do not diminish the purpose of the lights. DS 2-06.2.2.J 9) Landscape Concept The landscape concept for Gateway Centre (Exhibit 8) must unify and set the character for this urban space; repletion of a common theme and drought resistant, low maintenance plant materials will strengthen and enhance this image. (Basic landscaping specifications have been included as Appendix B.) Where a variety of architectural approaches are permitted for buildings, continuity must be assured by coordinated landscaping, signage, street furniture and lighting. Review the continuity of the landscape design for compliance with the PAD requirements. |
| 06/15/2011 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Keith Kesti, P.E. SUBJECT: Wal-Mart Engineering Development Plan review PARCEL: 133-23-164A, T14S R15E Sec8 REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, P.E. CASE NUMBER: D11-0015 LOCATION: FEMA X-Unshaded, for both 1636K & 2302L SUMMARY: Engineering has received and reviewed the Wal-Mart demolition and new parking lot project for review. Engineering does not recommend approval of the plan at this time. See the following comments to address. DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: 1) DS Sec.2-08.5.1.A: Regarding accessibility, address the following comments: a) Label and show sidewalk (minimum width: 4ft). b) Show and label existing or proposed marked cross walk for accessible route, if required, per Ron Brown's review comments for accessibility to the existing building. 2) DS Sec.11-01.2.2.I: Address the following preliminary grading related comments: a) A SWPPP will need to be submitted with the grading plan. Also address the following SWPPP related comment: revise detail SF on sheet CP-3.0 to remove compacted backfill above grade in front of silt fence, to allow for continuation of flow through the silt fence and prevent concentration of flows along front of silt fence. b) A grading permit application will be required, and may be submitted at this time. (A grading permit provides inspections for the project and is typically required for projects where drainage must be inspected.) For any questions, call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 06/16/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 16, 2011 Daniel Chambers Atvell LLC 4700 E Southern Ave. Mesa, Arizona 85206 Subject: D11-0015 WAL-MART #1291 IMPROVEMENTS Development Plan Dear Daniel: Your submittal of May 13, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 6 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Planning, HC Site, Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, PDSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Planning, Zoning, Landscape, PDSD) 3 Copies Last Existing Wal-Mart Development Plan (Planning, Zoning, PDSD) 2 Copies Lot Combo Documentation if applicable (Zoning, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (480) 830-4888 |