Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D11-0014
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/10/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 05/10/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | REAL ESTATE | Passed | |
| 05/11/2011 | ED ABRIGO | PIMA COUNTY | ASSESSOR | Passed | Passed per Sherry Hyde. |
| 05/11/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | COT NON-DSD | TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT | Approved | I do not have any objections to this proposal. CSO Becky Noel #37968 Tucson Police Dept 837-7428 |
| 05/12/2011 | TOM MARTINEZ | OTHER AGENCIES | AZ DEPT TRANSPORTATION | Approved | >>> Douglas Kratina <DKratina@azdot.gov> 05/12/2011 7:36 AM >>> Regional Traffic Engineering has no comment on this submittal and recommends approval of the development. It will have no impact on any existing ADOT facilities. Thank you. |
| 05/12/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 05/18/2011 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Jackson Jenkins Director 201 N. Stone Ave., 8th Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 PH: (520) 740-6500 FAX: (520) 620-0135 May 17, 2011 To: KIM WOLFARTH, AIA DLR GROUP Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: TUCSON MEDICAL CENTER (TMC) WEST CAMPUS IMPROVEMENTS Development Plan – 1st Submittal D11-0014 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:______ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 05/18/2011 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 05/18/2011 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D11-0014 TMC WEST CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANS/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: May 18, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Label all building numbers. Please clarify why the lots are split up into parcels 1 – 6 under Legal Description (per title report) on sheet 1. Is this development plan for the Proposed Parking Garage located on lot 7? If so, please add lot 7 to all of the title blocks. Also, only include the lot numbers that are part of the development plan. Are there any other lot numbers that need to be included on the title blocks? Delete adjacent parcel codes and owner information. Correct Beverly Street to Avenue on sheet C1.1. Correct Match Sheet C1.7 to C1.6 on sheet C1.4. Correct Match Sheet C1.7 to C1.6 and Match Sheet C1.6 to C1.7 on sheet C1.5. |
| 05/23/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. On sheet C0.2, Please add the following: "ACCESSIBILITY CODE REQUIREMENTS" All accessibility requirements within the boundaries of the property line are to be as per the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design. a. Please change all ADAAG references of this project to 2010 ADASDAD. 2. As per the 2010 ADASAD, the requirements for detectable warnings is not limited to platform boarding edges as per section 705. a. The detectable warning strips designed throughout all the accessible plans and details at all ramps, aisles and passenger loading zones are not required by the 2010 ADASAD and may be removed. However, Zoning will accept the use of truncated domes as a pedestrian and vehicle way separation as depicted at all the passenger loading zones. Please reconcile with the Zoning department plan reviewer. SHEET C0.6 3. The note reference for pedestrian ramps to sheet 64 is incorrect. Please change the reference to sheets 35 and 36. SHEET C2.1 4. At note 25, there is no ADAAG Section 2.17. Please provide correct ADASAD section reference. SHEET C2.5 5. DITTO comment 5 above. SHEET C2.7 6. Please provide a large scale detail of the ramp and landing system design to access the Future North Campus Expansion Building. Provide handrails and handrail details. SHEET C2.16 7. Please provide handrails as required per 2010 ADASAD Section 405 for ramps having a rise greater than 6" as depicted by ramp detail "F". 8. For all details that indicate a ramp length of 6' min, change the requirement to 6' max. 9. Insure a 5' turn around at ramp details "C", "H" and "K". 10. Replace the ADAAG reference throughout this sheet to 2010 ADASAD. SHEET C2.17 11. At the accessible parking detail, insure that all signage is located within the curb line, not in the parking area. GENERAL 12. All new marked crossing are indicating a tile pattern. In some instances the tile pattern does not go all the way to the curb ramp and a in some instances it does. Please provide a detail that shows the pattern short of continuance to the curb and indicate what methods are used to define the marked crossing from the edge of the tile pattern to the face of the curb. A marked crossing defines a continuous path of travel from a safe area across a hazardous area to an opposite safe area. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/24/2011 | ELIZABETH LEIBOLD | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | TO: Kim Wolfarth, R.A. SUBJECT: TMC West Campus Phase Development Package Engineering Revision ADDRESS: 5301 E Grant Rd FLOODPLAIN STATUS (PHASE 1): X-unshaded zone, & A zone - contained in channel, 1644K REVIEWER: Elizabeth Leibold, PE DATE: May 24, 2011 CASE NUMBER: D11-0014 SUMMARY: The revised development package sheets were submitted with cover letter for a proposed revision to the Development Package for TMC West Campus Phase improvements. Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the revision to the Development Package and does not recommend approval until the following comments are addressed. Comments are primarily for grading plan sheets. COMMENTS 1) For grading / drainage plan / grading section sheets, provide 100-yr ponding limits on planviews and applicable sections. 2) Show more spot elevations to indicate positive gradients through waterharvesting / basin areas. Although minimum of 0.5% is required, 1 % may be needed to assure that post-construction conditions do not have ponding issues that may delay the project completion. 3) Provide geotechnical addenda providing recommendations for setbacks for structures from proposed ponding areas and irrigation lines, including pavement and building structures. Assure plans show conformance to these geotechnical recommendations, or abide by IBC code for positive gradient for 10-ft at 5% from structures. 4) Add Notes to sheets where offsite improvements are proposed to occur; PIA or right-of-way use permitting may be required. 5) Address the following comments for the SWPP sheets: a. On sheet C8.2, add notation or clarify that 50-ft min width stabilized entrances are needed unless are is not available within grading limits. 6) DS Sec.3-05 Table 1 (value "A"): Label parking stall angle for the proposed angled parking. a. DS Sec.3-05 Table 1: Revise stall layout to provide minimum distance dimensioned according to minimum distance shown in Table 1 for value "E". b. DS Sec.3-05.2.3.C.2: The proposed stalls with landscape islands are measuring too short. Assure minimum 15.5 feet is provided with the 2.5 feet that includes wheel stop for stalls in front of the landscape islands per DS Sec.3-05 Figure 5. c. DS Sec.3-05 Table 1 (value "D"): Dimension minimum distance of 24-ft behind accessibility parking stalls proposed at east end of parking area. 7) In drainage report address the following comments: a. Provide clearly the locations and types of bleed pipes and positive gradients throughout drainage systems on proposed drainage exhibit sheets. b. On proposed condition exhibit sheets, provide 100-yr ponding limits on planviews. c. Discuss the need for percolation testing in any areas that do not have positive gradients, outfall areas, bleed pipes, or potential for standing stormwater. 8) Address the following drafting comments for clarification: a. Revise north arrow on sheet C0.8. b. Clarify leader for Limits of Work on sheet C2.2. c. Check/clarify match sheet call outs on sheet C2.4. d. On SWPP sheets, legend indicates an hatching area for basins where material etc storage is not allowed. This hatching does not appear to be showing on planviews; clarify. Further comments may be provided after resubmittal. If you have questions, you are welcome to call me at 837-4934. Elizabeth Leibold, P.E., CPM, CFM Civil Engineer Engineering Division Planning & Development Services Department |
| 05/24/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | 1) Revise the note regarding screening on sheet LC-2. Screening per LUC 3.7.3 does apply to this site, except as modified by the PAD. Call out any screening provided to meet the applicable provisions. The previous Development Plans provided heavily planted landscape/trail corridors. This made requests to distinguish the coverage plants from the screening plants unnecessary, but did not waive screening requirements. 2) Revise the plant coverage calculations on sheet LC-2. The coverage requirements is not based strictly on a ten foot wide border, but the unpaved portion of the 30' landscape corridor. |
| 05/25/2011 | DAVID RIVERA | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: David Rivera Principal Planner PROJECT: D11-0014 TMC West Campus Improvements Development Package TRANSMITTAL DATE: May 23, 2011 DUE DATE: May 24, 2011 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is May 10, 2012. 2. DS 2-01.3.3 - This project has been assigned the development plan case number D11-0014. List the case number next tot eh title block of all plan sheets. 3. DS 2-01.3.7.F - Under the City of Tucson Trail Notes section, provide the Alamo Wash ROW covenant recordation. Fill in the blanks book and page or if a new recordation revise to include the sequence number. 4. The following comments are based on the review of the site sheets and under the DS 2-01.3.8. Comments are not necessarily based on only existing site conditions. a. On sheet C1.1, clarify if there exist or proposed screen walls or monument signs within the sight visibility triangles. It appears from the drawing that both are within the Grant Road and Beverly St. intersection SVT's. A DSMR approval and specifically approval by Traffic engineering will be required if the SVT's are obstructed. Contact Patricia Gehlen for additional information on the DSMR process and application. b. Review match line sheets numbers and verify consistency with actual sheet matches. It appears that some of the match sheet numbers are not correctly labeled on some of the sheets. c. Verify the West Pavilion building square footage noted on sheets C1-6 and C1-7. The total is listed as 219,000 GSF but in adding the square footages listed the total adds up to 205, 264 square feet. Revise all plan sheets where this error occurs d. remove any reference numbers that are listed in the lower right corner of the plans sheets that do not apply to this specific development plan. 5. I could not verify the bicycle parking for the Pavilion building. As you may be aware by now the revised vehicle and bicycle parking ordinance was adopted in last 2 months. While the PAD has specific vehicle parking ratios the bicycle parking ratios are not listed on the plan (at least that I could verify). Provide the location and number of both short and long term bicycle parking facilities. Include any calculations related to the new Pavilion development. 6. DS 2-01.3.9.Q - Provide the correct square footage of the Pavilion building, and the specific use(s) of the building is to be listed on the sheets depicting the building footprint. 7. Additional Comments may be forthcoming based on response to the zoning comments and revisions made to the plan sheets. 8. Zoning has no comments related to the grading plan on this review as there are probably changes that will be required on the plan sheets. Zoning will review the grading plan at the next submittal. Ensure that any changes that are made to the site plan sheets are made tot eh grading plan sheets to match If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call David Rivera, (520) 791-5608. DGR C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D110014dp.doc RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development plan, and additional requested documents. |
| 05/25/2011 | JWILLIA4 | OTHER AGENCIES | PIMA ASSN OF GOVTS | Passed | |
| 05/25/2011 | JWILLIA4 | TUCSON WATER NEW AREA DEVELOPMENT | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 05/25/2011 | JANE DUARTE | COT NON-DSD | PARKS & RECREATION | Approved | |
| 05/25/2011 | JWILLIA4 | OTHER AGENCIES | TUCSON AIRPORT AUTHORITY | Passed | |
| 05/25/2011 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Denied | PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT COMMENTS Regarding SUBJECT: Community Design Review Committee Application CASE NUMBER: CASE NAME: DATE SENT D11-0014 TMC West Campus Capital Improvements () Tentative Plat (X) Development Plan (X) Landscape Plan () Revised Plan/Plat () Board of Adjustment () Other - CROSS REFERENCE: TMC PAD AREA/NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN: Arcadia-Alamo Area Plan GATEWAY/SCENIC ROUTE: NO COMMENTS DUE BY: 05/24/2011 SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/PLAT HAS BEEN REVIEWED BY COMMUNITY PLANNING AND PRESERVATION, AND STAFF SUBMITS THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: () No Annexation or Rezoning Conditions, Not an RCP - No Comment () Proposal Complies with Rezoning () RCP Proposal Complies With Plan Policies (X) Resubmittal Required - See Additional Comments Attached () No Additional Comments - Complies With Planning Comments Submitted on: REVIEWER: msp 791-5505 DATE: 05/17/2011 Comments 1. The Tucson Medical Center (TMC), PAD calls out in Section 3.3.6.A. & B., that landscape within the PAD District shall conform to one of four landscaped themes as outlined in the PAD document, with Appendix 6 including descriptions of the four themes. Landscape plans shall incorporate landscape consistent with the recommended landscape theme or themes for the development plan area. Please provide information that identifies the landscape theme being used with the development plan areas - and provide this information on the landscape cover sheet and as keynotes within the various landscape plan sheets. One example is to refer to the landscape plan submitted for Phase I of TMC along the eastern side of the project. Project was reviewed and approved under Development Plan D09-0032, Development Package-Planting Plan. Please see sheet 122 for an appropriate landscape theme breakdown. The Plant Legend needs to delineate the trees, shrubs, accents, and groundcover for each of the themes: Early Landscape, Canyon, and Sonoran (see Appendix 6 of the TMC PAD for the various plant make-up of these themes. Also note that TMC PAD, Section 3.3.6.B.1 calls out for the early landscape theme in proximity to the Arizona, Patio and Erickson buildings, and the urban canyon landscape theme to be used in and around the tallest buildings constructed within the 100 and 150 foot building height zones, while the perimeter PAD borders are to follow the Sonoran Desert theme. 2. Please provide the follow documentation: The TMC PAD, under Section 3.4.1.B. & C - Architectural Review Board (ARB), requires the ARB to provide a letter of recommendation to the City (Tucson) at the time of plan submittal advising whether the architectural design conforms to the TMC Design Guidelines. The letter needs to address the overall proposed site improvements, and in particular to address the monument walls/signs along the Grant Road frontage, the proposed parking garage and the proposed West Campus Pavilion. 3. Please provide four-sided building elevations on the proposed parking garage and the northern, western and southern building elevation on the proposed West Campus Pavilion. |
| 05/25/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | May 25, 2011 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D11-0014 PROJECT NAME: TMC-West Campus PROJECT ADDRESS: 5301 E Grant Rd PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. 1. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 2. A private improvement agreement (PIA) will be necessary for the proposed work to be performed within the Right-of-way. An approved development plan is required prior to applying for a PIA. Contact the PIA Coordinator for additional PIA information at 791-5100. 3. Per the Traffic Impact Analysis additional queuing is required for the existing left turn lane along eastbound Grant Road at Beverly Avenue. Schematically illustrate the recommended off site improvements on the development plan. Final dimensions for all off site improvements will be illustrated on the PIA plans. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 05/26/2011 | JWILLIA4 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Approved | Date Case Number Project Address May 24, 2011 D11-0014 TMC West Campus Improvements Development Plan Comments: The proposed Development Plan for the, The TMC West Campus Improvements Development Case No.D11-0014, is acceptable to Environmental Services, Solid Waste Disposal and Recycle Materials Standard 6-01, and is Approved. Environmental Services Department Development Plan Review Reviewer: Tony Teran Office Phone (520) 837-3706 E-mail: Tony.Teran @tucsonaz.gov |
| 06/01/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES June 1, 2011 Kim Wolfarth, AIA DLR Group 177 N. Chruch # 755 Tucson, Arizona 01 Subject: D11-0014 TMC WEST CAMPUS IMPROVEMENTS Development Package Dear Kim: Your submittal of May 11, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 8 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 8 Copies Revised Development Package (Addressing, Zoning HC Site, Landscape, Engineering, Traffic, Planning, Zoning, PDSD) 2 Copies Geotechnical Addenda (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) 2 Copies Architectural Review Board Letter (Planning, PDSD) 2 Copies Four-sided Building Elevations (Planning, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 882-0989 |
| 06/01/2011 | LIZA CASTILLO | UTILITIES | TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER | Approved | TMC West Campus Improvements D11-0014 Tucson Electric Power Company has reviewed and approved the development plan submitted May 16, 2011. It appears that there are no conflicts with the existing facilities within the boundaries of this proposed development. Enclosed is a copy of a TEP facilities map showing the approximate location of the existing facilities. All relocation costs will be billable to the customer. In order to apply for electric service, call the New Construction Department at (520) 918-8300. Submit a final set of plans including approved site, offsite and electrical load plans. Include a CD with the AutoCAD version of the plans. If easements are required, they will be secured by seperate instrument. Your final plans should be sent to: Tucson Electric Power Company Attn: Richard Harrington New Business Project Manager P.O. Box 711 (DB-101) Tucson, AZ 85702 (520) 917-8726 Please call the area Designer Jennifer Crawford at (520) 917-8708 should you have any questions. Sincerly, Henrietta Noriega Office Specialist Design/Build hn Enclosures City of Tucson (Email Only) cc: J. Crawford |