Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Permit Number - D11-0013
Review Name: RESUBMITTAL - CDRC - DEV PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/26/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 08/02/2011 | RONALD BROWN | H/C SITE | REVIEW | Denied | For comments 1 and 2: Approval pending approved DSMR to dismiss the accessible pedestrian connections to both Richey Blvd. and Holly Av. and the continous accessible pedestrian circulation path within the boundaries of the site. |
| 08/02/2011 | JASON GREEN | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | DATE: August 2, 2011 SUBJECT: Quebedeaux Expansion Development Plan- 2nd Engineering Review TO: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager LOCATION: 3566 E Speedway Blvd, T145S R14E Sec09 Ward 6 REVIEWERS: Jason Green, CFM ACTIVITY: D11-0013 SUMMARY: Engineering Division of Planning & Development Services Department has received and reviewed the proposed Development Plan, Drainage Report No. 1 (DOWL Engineers, 04MAY11), and Geotechnical Evaluation (Western Technologies Inc., 27MAR07). Engineering Division recommends conditional approval of the Development Plan at this time. The following items need to be addressed prior to final CDRC approval: DEVELOPMENT PLAN: 1) DS Sec.2-05.2.2.B.6: Revise General Note #6 to reflect the Development Standard Modification Request. List the case number, date of approval, what was approved, and conditions of approval, if applicable. GRADING PLAN: 2) DS Sec.11-01.2.1: A grading permit is required for this project. A grading plan and a grading permit application will be required after Development Plan approval and prior to any construction activity. A grading permit may not be issued prior to Development Plan approval. 3) Please ensure that any future grading plan will be consistent with the Development Plan, Drainage Report, and Geotechnical Report. Grading standards may be accessed at: http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/DevStandsTOC.pdf 4) Arizona Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (AZPDES) is applicable to this project. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP) and text addressing stormwater controls for all areas affected by construction activities related to this development will be required. For further information, visit www.adeq.state.az.us/environ/water/permits/stormwater.html. GENERAL COMMENTS: Please provide the information for the DSMR on the Development Plan prior to final CDRC approval. For questions or to schedule a meeting call me at 837-4929. Jason Green, CFM Senior Engineer Associate Engineering Section Planning & Development Services |
| 08/03/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Jackson Jenkins Director 201 N. Stone Ave., 8th Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 PH: (520) 740-6500 FAX: (520) 620-0135 July 29, 2011 To: RICHARD CORDOVA DOWL HKM Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: QUEBEDEAUX BUICK - GMC Development Plan – 2nd Submittal D11-0013 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. If you have any questions please call me at the phone number above. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:______ Kristin Greene, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 08/08/2011 | GARY WITTWER | COT NON-DSD | TDOT | Denied | Requirements for placing a private irrigation line under a public roadway. 1. Residential streets only. 2. Sleeving shall be Sch. 80 PVC - 2" minimum. 3. Sleeve must extend beyond the ROW into private property. 4. Marking tape placed 12" above sleeve. 5. Top of sleeve to be 30" below top of paving. 6. Placards should be place on both sides of the street. 7. Curb shall be stamped with "IS" (Irrigation System) above sleeves. 8. The easement must be recorded on both tentative and final plat. 9. Legal recorded easement width to be a minimum of 5' and a maximum of 8'. 10. The number of easements shall be minimized. |
| 08/10/2011 | JOHN BEALL | COT NON-DSD | COMMUNITY PLANNING | Approved | |
| 08/11/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | Review conducted by Zelin Canchola |
| 08/15/2011 | STEVE SHIELDS | ZONING | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Steve Shields Lead Planner PROJECT: Quebedeaux Auto Dealership Development Plan (2nd Review) D11-0013 TRANSMITTAL DATE: August 15, 2011 DUE DATE: August 24, 2011 DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. Zoning Review Section conditionally approves the development plan for this project, subject to the following changes on the sign-off copies. However, should there be any changes requested by other CDRC members, the Zoning Review Section approval is void, and we request copies of the revised development plan to verify that those changes do not affect any zoning requirements 2. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 A continuous pedestrian circulation path/accessible route is required to connect to any adjacent street. That said show the required continuous pedestrian circulation path/accessible route to both Holly Avenue and Palo Verde blvd. 3. D.S. 2-05.2.4.K Per D.S. 2-08.3.1 provide a sidewalk that connects the "EXISTING SHOWROOM AND OFFICE BUILDING" to the "EXISTING 2-STORY USED CAR BUILDING" to the "EXISTING COLLISION CENTER BUILDING" to the "PROPOSED TEMP. SALES BUILDING". This sidewalk is required to meet of D.S. 2-08.4.1 & 5.1. 4. Zoning acknowledges that a Development Standards Modification Request (DSMR) will be applied for. If approved provide a note on the plan stating the DSMR Number, Date of Approval, What was Modified, and any Conditions of Approval. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please Steve Shields, (520) 837-4956 or Steve.Shields@tucsonaz.com Sshield1 on DS1/planning/New Development Package/ D11-0013 RESUBMITTAL OF THE FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED: Revised development package and additional requested documents. |
| 08/19/2011 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Approved | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D11-0013 QUEBEDAUX AUTO/REVISED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: August 17, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and we hereby approve this project. Submit a 24 x 36 Reverse Reading Double Matte Photo Mylar or bond paper of approved Development Plan to City Planning. Signed and dated Mylar will be forwarded to Pima County Addressing prior to assignment of addresses. 2.) All addresses will need to be displayed per Pima County Address Standards at the time of final inspection. |
| 08/24/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | PDSD LANDSCAPE 1) Provide reference to any approved code or standard modification or variance cases on all plan sheets. APPLICABLE PREVIOUS COMMENTS: 1) The proposed refuse storage/pickup location is required to be located behind a street landscape border per LUC Table.3.7.2-I. Even if the location is allowed per the comment below (with the access drive crossing the landscape border) the actual enclosure structure is required to be located behind the 10' wide border, providing a greater setback and a less prominent appearance in the streetscape which is primarily residential in character. A LUC Variance or DDO would be required to modify this requirement. 2) New development is required to provide on-site refuse storage, collection, and pickup areas with service access from within the tract or from an alley adjacent to the tract per DS 6-01.4.1.A. A DSMR is required modify this Development Standard. 4) Landscape borders proposed in right-of-way or MS&R areas must be approved by the City Engineer or designee and comply with the City Engineer's requirements on construction, irrigation, location, and plant type. The correspondence received on this item appears to allow only a 5' landscaping expansion in to the specified rights-of-way. The plans propose an encroachment in excess of 7 feet. Provide verification, in writing, of any additional approvals obtained. Contact Gary Wittwer, DOT Landscape Architect for specific requirements and add the Standards for ROW landscaping to the plans. 7) A DDO or variance will be required to allow the existing walls in the street landscape to meet the screening requirements of the LUC. A DDO or variance will also be required to retain existing fencing in lieu of masonry wherever the site adjoins residential zoned property. 8) A DDO or variance is also required wherever the proposal is to provide less than the minimum width street landscape border. LUC 3.7.2.4 10) Multi-trunk trees as proposed in the SVT'S along Speedway Boulevard (see plant list, sht. 2 of the landscape plan.) These trees may pose a potential safety concern. Revise the plans to conform to DS 2-06.3.8.G and consult with the TDOT landscape Architect on tree selection. 13) Clearly indicate the water harvesting proposal on the Development Plan (sht. 3) as required by the conditions of rezoning. |
| 08/25/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES August 25, 2011 Richard Cordova DOWL HKM 166 W Alameda St. Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: D11-0013 QUEBEDEAUX AUTO DEALERSHIP Development Plan Dear Richard: Your submittal of May 6, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 6 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Plan (Engineering, HC Site, TDOT, Zoning, Landscape, PDSD) 4 Copies Revised Landscape Plan (Engineering, Zoning, Landscape, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: 624-0384 |