Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D11-0010
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/20/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/21/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Approved | |
| 04/21/2011 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/21/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/25/2011 | PGEHLEN1 | DESIGN EXAMINER | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Hi, Trish, I reviewed the project for compliance with the IID Design Criteria. Here are my comments on the Just a Fence project: I recommend approval of the project conditioned upon the fence being finished with a sealant to prevent rust from bleeding. The following is not a condition, but a recommendation to the applicant: Use umbrellas or some other non-permanent shade structure when/if the patio is used during the day. Thanks, Adam |
| 04/26/2011 | PGEHLEN1 | ENV SVCS | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/26/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Denied | April 26, 2011 ACTIVITY NUMBER: D11-0010 PROJECT NAME: Just a Fence PROJECT ADDRESS: 318 E Congress St PROJECT REVIEWER: Jose E. Ortiz PE, Traffic Engineer Resubmittal Required: Traffic Engineering does not recommend approval of the Development Plan; therefore a revised Development Plan is required for re-submittal. The following items must be revised or added to the development plan. Include a response letter with the next submittal that states how all comments have been addressed. 1. Verify that a TRE has been secured for the development within the right of way. Ensure that the proposed development falls entirely within the limits of the TRE. 2. An Excavation Permit or a Private Improvement Agreement will be necessary for any work performed within the Right-of-way. Contact Permits and Codes at (520) 791-5100 for permit information. 3. The permit for right of way work will not be issued until the applicant has contacted Jim Rossi, Dave Koss, or Jose Ortiz in establishing the commencement date for payment to the City of Tucson on the noted TRE. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-6730 or Jose.Ortiz@tucsonaz.gov |
| 04/27/2011 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | DSD TRANSMITTAL FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D11-0010 318 E. Congress Development Plan TRANSMITTAL DATE: 04/26/11 COMMENTS: Please resubmit revised drawings along with redlines and a response letter, which states how all Zoning Review Section comments regarding the Land Use Code and Development Standards were addressed. 1. If any of the following comments are to be waived per the Infill Incentive District criteria provide documentation of what has been waived and add this information to the plan. 2. Provide a legal property description for the entire site. This site totals 8 separate tax parcels. A tax parcel combination is advised. Provide a copy of the tax parcel combination. This project appears to be located with in the City of Tucson right of way, provide a copy of the Temporary Revocable Easement (TRE). Clearly indicate the location of the boundaries of the TRE with distance and bearing of the leased area. 3. This project appears to be in conjunction with the other buildings on the site. Provide a site plan clearly indicating all buildings as well as all property lines. 4. Clearly indicate the proposed use of the "fenced area" per the LUC criteria with development designator and any subject to sections. Alcoholic Beverage Service "36", subject to: Sec. 3.5.4.19.C Clearly indicate the square footage of all areas used as a bar. A large bar is not allowed in this zone. Bar, Large. A bar which encompasses eighteen thousand (18,000) square feet or more of total area, including gross floor area and any outside areas providing service to the public, such as outdoor seating and recreation areas. 5. Zoning considers this expansion as a Bar use and has reviewed this plan accordingly. 6. The proposed expansion will require providing a total of 41 additional parking spaces to be provided. Provide the number of required and provided vehicle parking spaces on the site plan. 7. Per LUS 3.3.8 this project will require two short term and two long term bicycle parking spaces. Provide a detail of the proposed bicycle parking spaces clearly indicating the required access aisle, surfacing material, lighting, type of rack, etc. Provide in the calculations the number of required and the number of provided bicycle parking spaces. 8. Provide a pedestrian circulation path (sidewalk) from the north end of the patio connecting to the sidewalk in the right of way. Clearly indicate how pedestrian circulation will be provided to the gates on the south side of the patio. 9. If applicable provide the location of all easements, use, dimensions and recording information. 10. Provide the zoning of all adjacent properties. 11. This project has been assigned case number D11-0010, place the case number near the lower right corner of all sheets. 12. Provide the allowed and provided Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculations on the site plan per development designator 36. 13. Provide the expansion calculations on the site plan. 14. On sheet O1 in the project information section, remove the historic overlay portion and I believe this project is to be under the Infill Incentive District not the Rio Nuevo Downtown District. Clarify. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 |
| 04/27/2011 | LOREN MAKUS | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | April 27, 2011 D11-0010 The Engineering Division doesn’t recommend approval of this development plan at this time. Please address the following comments. 1. Provide a complete development plan with dimensions of lots, buildings, rights-of-way and other features. 2. Clearly label the area authorized by the temporary revocable easement for the proposed private use. Please provide a copy of the TRE document or some other documentation of the permission granted for use of the alley. 3. The “scope of work” indicates that this plan is only for the construction of a temporary perimeter fence. However, the plan seems to include the construction of additional stairs and ramps. Please clearly indicate the features that are existing and the ones proposed. 4. Clarify the use and traffic controls for the portions of the alley not included in the fenced area. How will vehicles be prevented from inadvertently entering the alley and subsequently having to back out onto Broadway Boulevard? If you have any questions or want to set up a meeting, contact me at loren.makus@tucsonaz.gov or 520.360.4299. Loren Makus, EIT Senior Engineering Associate |
| 04/27/2011 | ANDREW CONNOR | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Denied | The development plan has been reviewed by the Landscape Section but cannot complete review until all Zoning and Administrative, comments, concerns, and appropriate revisions have been addressed. |
| 04/28/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES April 28, 2011 Doug Biggers Rialto Theater 318 E. Congress St. Tucson, Arizona 85701 Subject: D11-0010 Just a Fence @ the Rialto Development Plan Dear Doug: Your submittal of April 20, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and a set of 5 DETAILED cover letters explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 5 Copies Revised Development Plan (Traffic, Zoning, Landscape, Engineering, PDSD) 4 Copies TRE Documentation (Traffic, Zoning, Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.ci.tucson.az.us/dsd/ Via fax: (520) 740-0071 |