Microfiche records prior to 2006 have not been completely digitized and may not be available yet on PRO. If you can not find what you are looking for please submit a records request.
Permit Review Detail
Review Status: Completed
Review Details: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Permit Number - D11-0009
Review Name: DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Review Status: Completed
| Review Date | Reviewer's Name | Type of Review | Description | Status | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 04/13/2011 | FERNE RODRIGUEZ | START | PLANS SUBMITTED | Completed | |
| 04/18/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ADA | REVIEW | Passed | |
| 04/18/2011 | DAVID MANN | COT NON-DSD | FIRE | Approved | |
| 04/27/2011 | TIM ROWE | PIMA COUNTY | WASTEWATER | Approved | Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Jackson Jenkins Director 201 N. Stone Ave., 8th Floor Tucson, Arizona 85701-1207 PH: (520) 740-6500 FAX: (520) 620-0135 April 26, 2011 To: DAN FILUK KDF/JMS ARCHITECTS, LLC Thru: Patricia Gehlen, CDRC Manager City of Tucson Development Services Department ____________________________________________ From: Tom Porter, Sr. CEA (520-740-6719), Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department Subject: FRY'S STORE #17 - NEW FUELING CENTER Development Plan – 1st Submittal D11-0009 The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department (PCRWRD) has reviewed the proposed sewer collection lines for the above-referenced project. The following comments are offered for your use: The Pima County Regional Wastewater Reclamation Department hereby approves the above referenced submittal of the development plan as submitted. If you have any questions please call me at the phone number above. cc: Chad Amateau, PE Checked by:______ Kristin Borer, PE, DLU Manager DLU Project folder |
| 05/02/2011 | JENNIFER STEPHENS | PIMA COUNTY | ADDRESSING | Denied | AUDREY FARENGA ADDRESSING REVIEW PH #: 740-6800 FAX #: 623-5411 TO: CITY PLANNING FROM: AUDREY FARENGA, ADDRESSING REVIEW SUBJECT: D11-0009 FRY’S FUELING CENTER #17/DEVELOPMENT PLAN DATE: April 29, 2011 The above referenced project has been reviewed by this Division for all matters pertaining to street naming/addressing, and the following matters must be resolved prior to our approval: Correct the Vicinity Map to 3”=1 Mile. Include the sections on the Vicinity Map. Change Aviation Hwy to Parkway. On the title blocks include the township, range and section. Delete 2480 N Swan Rd. |
| 05/09/2011 | RONALD BROWN | ZONING HC | REVIEW | Denied | 1. Connect the marked crossing of the Kisok to the accessible route to the 22nd Street right of way. 2. Relocate the Kiosk marked crossing to the East so as to provide a direct, 90 degree angle to the entrance stoop. On both ends of the marked crossing provide a 2' deep detectable warning strip just prior to entering the designated PAAL. 3. All the curb ramps of the accessible route to the main store and to the 22nd Street right of way, including detail numbers 3 and 4/SP2 need to have detectable warning strips at both end of all marked crossings as per 406.12 and 406.14. 4. Rework the accessible parking aisle to be adjacent to the newly configured accessible route. 5. Sign detail 2/SD1: The dimension to the bottom of the main sign is to be 7'-0" a.f.f. 6. Rework detail 2/SP-1 to match changes directed by comment 4 above. 7. At access ramp details shown on sheet C-4, provide detectable warning strips as required by ICC (ANSI 117.1), Sections 406.12 and 406.14 at both ends of all marked crossings. END OF REVIEW |
| 05/11/2011 | LAITH ALSHAMI | ENGINEERING | REVIEW | Denied | Laith Alshami, Engineering and Floodplain Review, 05/11/2011, TO: Patricia Gehlen FROM: Laith Alshami, P.E. CDRC Engineering SUBJECT: Fry's Fueling Center #17 D11-0009, T14S, R14E, SECTION 22 RECEIVED: Development Plan Package on April 14, 2011 The subject project has been reviewed. The project can not be approved at this time. Address the following comments before review can continue. Prepare a detailed response that explains the revisions that where made and references the exact location in the Final plat and in the Title Report where the revisions were made: Drainage Report: 1. According to FIRM 2234 K, the subject project falls with the FEMA x-shaded area of Naylor Wash, which is described as "areas of 100-year flood with average depths of less than a foot". Since 100-year flood areas are regulated, submit a drainage report that addresses the impact of offsite runoff on the proposed improvements. The proposed improvements may have to be raised at least one foot above the 100-year flood elevation especially the mechanical and electrical parts. 2. A Floodplain Use permit is required for the proposed work. 3. Site drainage must be addressed in the report especially if the drainage patterns are proposed to be altered. 4. The drainage report shall address roof drainage and sidewalk scuppers if applicable. According to D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when concentrated runoff crosses any sidewalk/walkway. Additionally, show the roof drainage direction on the drainage exhibit and provide sidewalk scuppers for the roof drains. Please be advised that the 10-year flow requirement does not apply to roof drainage. Roof drainage has to be discharged in its entirety to avoid prolonged ponding on the roof that might cause the roof to collapse. Demonstrate compliance with the sidewalk scupper requirement including design calculations. Show roof drainage on the drainage exhibits. 5. Design calculations shall be provided for all proposed drainage solutions and structures. 6. Address drainage facilities maintenance responsibility and what needs to be done. Provide drainage facilities maintenance checklist. Every Sheet: 1. Provide the D (yr)-______ subdivision case number and all relevant case numbers as required by D.S. 2-01.3.3.3. 2. Provide a minimum one (1) inch margin on left side and one-half (1/2) inch margin on all other sides to facilitate efficient record keeping (D.S. 2-01.2.1). 3. Revise every sheet in the document to provide a standard Title Block in the lower right quadrant of each sheet (D.S. 2-01.2.4) and (D.S. 2-01.3.2). 4. Revise all references to "DSD" and "Development Services Department" and replace them with "PDSD" and "Planning and Development Services Department". General/Grading Notes: 5. Add the following general note: "the proposed improvements are affected by the City of Tucson Floodplain Regulations". 6. Add the following general note: "A floodplain use permit and/or finished floor elevation certificates are required". 7. Show and label grading limits. Include the grading limits symbol in the legend. 8. Add the following general notes: a. The approved Development Package Plan is the only acceptable construction plan onsite. b. Revise General Note #41 to read as follows: "CALL FOR PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETINGS PRIOR TO START OF EARTHWORK. FOR A PDSD ENGINEERING INSPECTIONS, CALL IVR (740-6970), OR SCHEDULE WITH A CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE AT THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, OR CONTACT DSD ENGINEERING AT 791-5550 EXTENSION 2101, OR SCHEDULE INSPECTIONS ONLINE AT: http://cms3.tucsonaz.gov/pdsd/inspections". c. A copy of the approved Development Package Plan, Grading Permit, and any Geotechnical Reports shall be kept at the site at all times, until final grading approval. d. Any grading related revisions to the Development Package Plan MAY require a re-submittal to review the proposed a revisions. Contact PDSD Engineering at 791-5550 to discuss changes in the grading design. e. If grading construction is expected to last longer than the expiration date of the grading permit, contact PDSD to renew/extend the Grading Permit. If Final Grading Inspection has not been completed before the Grading Permit expires, and the permit has not been renewed, additional fees and reviews may be required. f. Contact Permits and Codes at 791-5100 for any questions regarding any right-of-way permit requirements. 9. Revise all references to "Development Services Department" and "DSD" to "Planning and Development Services Department" and "PDSD". 10. Provide the drainage structures maintenance responsibility note. Base Layer: 11. Show the basis of bearing and the tie as required by D.S. 2-01.3.8.A. 12. Show, if applicable, all existing easements as required by (D.S. 2-01.3.8.B.). 13. Provide public right of way recordation data as required by (D.S. 2-01.3.8.C.). 14. Provide, if applicable, all proposed easements as required by (D.S. 2-01.3.9.L.). Site Plan: 15. It is not clear which elevations are existing or proposed. Clarify which are which (D.S. 2-01.3.8.E.). 16. Provide all Existing storm drainage facilities on and adjacent to the site (D.S. 2-01.3.8.F). 17. Provide floodplain information as required by (D.S. 2-01.3.8.I). 18. Show existing sight visibility triangles (D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.2). 19. Show the location(s) of retention basin(s)/waterharvesting areas including 100-year ponding limits with water surface elevations (D.S. 2-01.3.9.N.1). 20. Indicate proposed drainage solutions, such as origin, direction and destination of flow and method of collecting and containing flow (D.S. 2-01.3.9.N.2). 21. Provide, if applicable, locations and types of drainage structures, such as, but not limited to, drainage pipes, erosion control pads, retention basins, sidewalk scuppers, etc. (D.S. 2-01.3.9.N.3). 22. Show the future sight visibility triangles along 6th Street based on MS&R information (D.S. 2-01.3.9.H.2). 23. Relocate the walls shown on Details B/21 and C/21 to be completely within the property line including their footings. Landscape Plan: 24. Ensure that the proposed landscaping does not obstruct visibility within the sight visibility triangles. Grading Plan: 25. Provide the T11BU00496 case number in the Tile Block. 26. Show and label grading limits. Include the grading limits symbol in the legend. 27. Show the locations of all proposed drainage structures with all required construction details (i.e. dimensions, materials, elevations, rock sizes, filter fabric, etc.). 28. According to D.S. 3-01.4.4.F. 10-year flow has to be completely conveyed under sidewalks when concentrated runoff crosses any sidewalk/walkway. Verify if this applicable to this project especially in the courtyard areas. Additionally, provide sidewalk scuppers for the roof drains when applicable. Please be advised that the 10-year flow requirement does not apply to roof drainage. Roof drainage has to be discharged in its entirety to avoid prolonged ponding on the roof that might cause the roof to collapse. Demonstrate compliance with the sidewalk scupper requirements. 29. Reference, on Sheet 9 of 15, the sheet number where cross section details for cross section A-A and B-B are shown. 30. Show filter fabric underneath all proposed river rock intended for erosion protection. 31. Call out, on Sheet 9 if 15, the second bollard that protects the Kiosk. 32. All proposed work in the public right of way will require a right of way excavation permit or a Private Improvement Agreement. Contact Thad Harvison of Transportation Department Permit and Codes at 791-5100 for additional information. 33. Revise the Development Plan Package according to the Drainage Report revisions. If you have any questions, I can be reached at 837-4933 or Laith.Alshami@tucsonaz.gov RESUBMITTAL REQUIRED: Revised Development Plan Package |
| 05/11/2011 | TERRY STEVENS | ZONING | REVIEW | Denied | CDRC TRANSMITTAL TO: Development Services Department Plans Coordination Office FROM: Terry Stevens Lead Planner PROJECT: D11-0009 Fry's Fueling Center #17 Development Package TRANSMITTAL: 05/10/11 DUE DATE: 05/12/11 COMMENTS: 1. Section 5.3.8.2, LUC, permits a maximum of one year from the date of application to obtain approval of a development plan. If, at the end of that time, the development plan has not been approved, it must be revised to be in compliance with all regulations in effect at that time, and must be resubmitted for a full CDRC review. The one-year expiration date for this development plan is 04/13/11. 2. DS 2-01.3.3 Provide relevant case numbers (previous development plan, overlay special application, DDO, etc.) near the lower right corner of all sheets. This project has been assigned case number D11-0009. Place this case number near the lower right corner of all sheets. 3. DS 2-01.3.4 Provide on the location map the section corners. 4. DS 2-01.3.7.A.4 Provide the proposed use as a general note as follows: General Merchandise Sales "31", subject to: Sec. 3.5.9.2.A 5. DS2-01.3.7.A.6.b Provide a general note indicating that this project has been designed to meet the criteria of the following: Sec.2.8.3, Major Streets and Routes (MS&R) Setback Zone 6. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.b Provide the allowed and proposed Floor Area Ratio (FAR) calculations. Lot coverage calculations are not required. Remove from plan. Indicated on the plan are two parcel as being excluded. These parcels are to be included in the calculations for total building square footage, site size, expansion calculations, parking calcs, etc. This entire site is acting as one site. 7. DS 2-01.3.7.A.9.c Percentage of building, lot area, or vehicular use area expansion. If the building(s) or lot area have been previously expanded, those calculations shall be included. 8. DS 2-01.3.8.B If applicable, all easements shall be drawn on the plan. The recordation information, location, width, and purpose of all easements on site will be stated. 9. DS 2-01.3.9.H.2 Show future and existing sight visibility triangles. On a designated MS&R street, the sight visibility triangles are based on the MS&R cross-section. 10. DS 2-01.3.9.H.5.a The provided vehicle parking calculations do not indicate the new LUC parking requirements. For a shopping center the ratio is now 1:300 for all uses as long as 50% or greater of the building square footage has a parking ratio of greater than 1:100. Revise the required number of parking spaces. 11. DS 2-01.3.9.Q Provide the overhead clearance of the canopy from adjacent grade. If you have any questions about this transmittal, please call Terry Stevens, (520) 837-4961 TLS C:\planning\cdrc\developmentplan\D11-0009dp.doc Grading notes for permits plus. With DEVELOPMENT PLAN 05/11/2011 Development Services Department Zoning Review Section Terry Stevens Lead Planner Comments: 1. The grading plan has been reviewed by Zoning Review Section but cannot approve the plan until it has been approved by the Engineering, and Landscape Review Sections and until all zoning comments or concerns have been addressed. 2. Zoning could not verify that the grading plan was in compliance with the approved development plan. Please submit two copies of the approved and stamped development, landscape, and NPPO plans with the next grading plan submittal. 3. Zoning will re-review the grading plan on the next submittal to insure compliance with the approved site/development plan. Additional comments may be forthcoming. |
| 05/12/2011 | JOSE ORTIZ | COT NON-DSD | TRAFFIC | Approved | |
| 05/12/2011 | JOE LINVILLE | LANDSCAPE | REVIEW | Approv-Cond | Revise the landscape plan to provide additional on site screening along 22nd Street. Screening plants should provide a continuous opaque barrier between the street and the vehicular use areas. |
| 05/13/2011 | JOHN WILLIAMS | ZONING-DECISION LETTER | REVIEW | Denied | COMMUNITY DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES May 13, 2011 Dan Filuk KDF Architecture Group 4001 N. 3rd St., # 130 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 Subject: D11-0009 FRY'S FUELING CENTER # 17 Development Package Dear Dan: Your submittal of April 13, 2011 for the above project has been reviewed by the Community Design Review Committee and the comments reflect the outstanding requirements which need to be addressed before approval is granted. Please review the comments carefully. Once you have addressed all of the comments, please submit the following revised documents and 6 sets of the DETAILED cover letter explaining how each outstanding requirement has been addressed: ALL BLACKLINES MUST BE FOLDED 6 Copies Revised Development Package (Addressing, Zoning HC, Engineering, Zoning, Landscape, PDSD) 2 Copies Revised Drainage Report (Engineering, PDSD) Should you have any questions, please call me at 837-4893. Sincerely, John Williams Planning Technician All comments for this case are available on our website at http://www.tucsonaz.gov/dsd/ Via fax: (602) 234-1413 |